Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU00246
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | zoning will review the grading plan once engineering and landscape divisions have approve the grading plan - and once the site plan has been approved by all divisions. |
| 04/16/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Site plan approval is required prior to grading plan approval. 2) Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the grading plan. |
| 05/21/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 21, 2008 SUBJECT: COPE Behavioral Services Site/Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Reliable Permits Attn: Joe Barbea LOCATION: 1477 W Commerce CT, T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00429 (Site Plan) and Grading Plan (T08BU00246) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan and grading plan. The site plan and grading plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the width of the proposed gates. Per DS Sec.2-08 a minimum 4-foot gate is required. 2) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to clearly label and dimension the required pedestrian circulation from existing Building 3 to proposed Building 4. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and Keynote #14 to provide a modified Type 1 scupper that is proposed for the 2-cells at concentration points 10.7 and 10.7A. Per Standard Public Improvement Detail 204 a Type 1 scupper does not dimension a 2-cell width, revise. GRADING PLAN: 4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Revise the grading plan, Sheet C2, to include keynote #14 on the south side of the proposed building. This landscape area must be depressed a minimum of 6-inch to maximize water harvesting and to ensure the drainage of the swale and roof runoff. 5) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the grading plan, Sheet C2, to verify the scupper location for the existing concentration point 10.3. 6) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the grading plan and Sheet C2, to clarify the runoff location for concentration point 10.3B. Verify if there is a wall opening or if the portion of this area is wrought iron, flow through. 7) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the site plan and Keynote #14 to provided a modified Type 1 scupper that is proposed for the 2-cells at concentration points 10.7 and 10.7A. Per Standard Public Improvement Detail 204 a Type 1 scupper does not dimension a 2-cell width, revise. 8) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/23/2008 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/23/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |