Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM03308
Parcel: 141113700

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T07CM03308
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/01/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Distance from existing fire hydrant exceeds limitations. Please refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code, Section 508. Additional hydrant or fire sprinklers required.
11/06/2007 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. EXTERIOR SOUTH WALL MUST BE 1 HOUR RATED AS PER TABLE 602 BASED ON FIRE SEPARTAION DISTANCE
2. PREVIOUS COMMENT CONCERNING APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE, REFERENCE SHEET A2.0, CODE INFORMATION REFERENCING APPLICABLE 2006 BUILDING CODE
3. PROVIDE LOADING CALCULATIONS FOR SECOND LEVEL FRAMING STORAGE AND POST RESULTS AS PER SECTION 1603.2 AND 1603.3
4. CURB RAMP DETAIL 4 SHEET 2, DOES NOT WORK, REFERENCE ANSI 117.1/406.13.1
11/08/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
11/16/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The specified drinking fountain does not meet the accessibility requirements as shown in Section 1109.5, IBC 2006.
2. The specified water heater is not capable of limiting the water temperature at the lavatories to 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Consult the manufacturer for a suitable model. Reference Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.
3. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the correct developed pipe length from the meter to the furthest plumbing outlet (see the site plan). Reference Section 610.2, UPC 2006.
4. Provide a cleanout (1-way) at the connection of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference Section 719.1, UPC 2006.
11/16/2007 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/16/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the energy code compliance calculations to reflect the project location (Pima County <4,000 Feet, not the city of Pima, Arizona). Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. The U-values used for the overhead door and for the hollow metal door do not agree with the manufacturer's U-values as shown on sheet A2.0.
3. Provide a detail to clarify how the exterior walls and the roof are to be provided with continuous R-19 insulation using fiberglass batts.
11/23/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Panel schedule provides power for duct-mounted strip heater on Ckt 18,20. This was not found on the Mechanical sheets or the electrical plan. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEW OF 8/10/07.
2. Phase A and B appear to have 41,525 VA and 43,025 VA respectively, not 33770 and 33813. PANEL LOADING WAS WRITTEN UP ON REVIEW OF 8/10/07. Panel VA would be 84,550 VA, not 67,583 VA, so current would be 352A, not 282A. Feeder ampacity is only 200A.
3. The "c" value for 500 kcmil is 26706 for non-magnetic conduit, not 25000. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEW OF 8/10/07.
4. Specify the fault current rating of the panel.
5. For any series rating, specify the line side and load side ratings. THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE REVIEW OF 8/10/07. Line and load side ratings still not specified. Also please note that a series rated combination shall be selected by Engineering Supervision, and the Registrant on this project is an Architect. Either get a Registered Electrical Engineer to take responsibility for this aspect of the project, or simply fully rate the new panel for its available fault current.
11/28/2007 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/19/2008 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/19/2008 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed