Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Permit Number - T07CM02315
Review Name: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/09/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/12/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/16/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/16/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. Zoning reviewed and compared the building plans with the site plan drawings that were included with the pacakge to do a preliminary review. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the comparison between the approved development plan and the building plans. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the CDRC approved Development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the building plan packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development plan as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans. 3. The two following items must be addressed on sheet C1.2 and and C1.3. a. Add truncated domes to the island cutout next to the ADA parking spaces. The domes should be placed at the end of the ramp adjacent to the PAAL. Revise detail 7 and drawing as required to indicate this requirement. b. Detail 8-b must be revised to to indicate the truncated domes adjacent to the PAAL and the ramp. (The truncated domes have been drawn on the down slope within the sidewalk system.) There is a conflict with the ramp (as noted above) and the loading zone as key noted in Sheet A001. The paving plan sheet C1.2 does not indicate that the ramp is for access to a loading zone but it is noted on sheet A001. Per DS 2-08.4.1.F, a sidewalk or pedestrian refuge may not be located between a parking spaces and a PAAL providing access to that space (in this case the loading zone). c. Third party must re-review the changes and re-stamp the revised sheets. 4. Zoning will re-review and approve the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package and the building structural portions of the plan review have been approved. See comment 2 for additional info regarding the site plan process. 5. Zoning is willing tor review the changes on a one day turnaround and possibly the same day with an appointment if time permits. |
| 07/17/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2007 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/18/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |