Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM01348
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/21/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/28/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning comments |
| 02/28/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site. except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Provide approval documentation for use of ROW. 2. Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. Parking space can not be located within landscape border. 3. Fifty (50) percent or more of the 10' street landscape border area located on site must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. 4. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show the location and/or material for screening element on the landscape. 5. Revise the site and landscape plans to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.2.3.B. 6. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. 7. Shows refuse container storage location on the landscape plan. 8. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 9. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the DSMR case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 10. Note: The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 11. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/28/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tio's Master Cutz - 3232 N. Stone Ave. T07CM01348 Site Plan (4th Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 28, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a RESPONSE LETTER, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. Due to the substantial changes to the site plan additional comments have been generated. 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. The truncated domes are to be located os the edge nearest the curb are 6 to 8 inches from the curb line. D.S. 2-02-2.1.A.8 Show the required detectable warning devices (truncated domes) at the access ramps on the handicapped parking detail, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13. 3. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-02-2.1.A.8 The location of the handicapped sign appears to encroach into the vehicle overhang area. Clearly delineate on the plan that the proposed sign does not encroach into the vehicle overhang area. 4. Provide a dimension for the western most vehicle parking space. D.S. 2-02-2.1.A.8 If the western most vehicle parking space is allowed to remain as shown the minimum width for a vehicle parking space next to a wall is ten (10) feet, see D.S. 3-05.2.1.3. 5. Zoning acknowledges that a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) has been applied for. If the DSMR is approved provide the DSMR case number, date of approval, what the DSMR is for, and any conditions on the site plan. D.S. 2-02-2.1.A.12 The proposed three (3) foot sidewalk running along the south property line does not meet the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1, revise the plan to meet this requirement. For your information vehicle parking and parking area access aisles are allowed within the no build easement. 6. This comment was not addressed. Based on the provided building floor plans main entrance area, the sidewalk between the entrance area and the handicapped access aisle must be four (4) foot in width. Revise the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It appears that the main entrance encroaches into the minimum four (4) foot width of the required sidewalk along the west side of the proposed building please clarify. 7. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It appears that the sidewalk that runs along the south property line intersects the sidewalk within the ROW at an access ramp. Provide a detail that clearly delineates how the area between the entrance parking area access lane (PAAL) and the alley and the pedestrian access/accessible route on site works. It does not appear that the access ramps within the ROW have the minimum landing at the top of the ramps, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.7. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate on the plan that the loading zone exit into the alley meets the requirement of LUC Section 3.4.4.2. Based on COT Zoning maps there is residential zoning on the north side of the alley within the block. Based on current aerial photos the alley is not paved for the entire length of the block. Also see LUC Section 6.2.2 for the definition of Block. A Board of Adjustment for variance is required to use this alley. 9. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Provide recorded legal descriptions for the "BUILDING EASEMENT" keynote 20 and "NO BUILD" keynote 36. 10. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 Zoning acknowledges that curb side trash pick up is proposed. Provide documentation that curb side pick up has been approved by solid waste, a DSMR maybe required, see Engineering comments. 11. Provide the proposed height for the wall called out under keynote 30. 12. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t07cm01348-4th.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/04/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 03/18/2008 | CPIERCE1 | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |