Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM00243
Parcel: 13819045B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T07CM00243
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/22/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/31/2007 BETSY COTTLE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
02/05/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the size of the natural gas pipe connecting AC-12 and WH-1 to the main gas line. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
2. On roof area A, the scupper width is too small to accommodate the design rainfall without exceeding a 2" depth of flow. Revise the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.4, UPC 2003, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2003.
3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Include all fixtures (e.g. the kitchen fixtures) when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 2003.
4. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out sheet P102, including its maximum approved depth. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2003.
5. Provide listing information for the shower control valves to show that they comply with the requirements of Section 420.0, UPC 2003, and specifically ASSE 1016.
6. Clarify how WH-4 is to be located 8'-0" AFF (detail 3/P302) in an area that has a ceiling located 9'-8" AFF (sheet A702). Provide structural calculations and details to show that the water heater and expansion tank are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 314.5, UPC 2003.
7. The flow control device for the specified grease interceptor has a 3" outlet. Connecting it to a 2" waste line is prohibited by Section 316.4.1, UPC 2003.
02/05/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings (FS-1 through FS-4) to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. Show the locations of the cleanouts for the grease ducts. Reference Sections 506.3.8 and 506.3.9, IMC 2003.
3. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2003.
4. Revise the installation of the hood to provide 18" of clearance between the hood and combustible construction (e.g. wall cabinets, ceilings, etc.). Reference Section 507.9, IMC 2003.
5. Provide adequate make up air for the kitchen exhaust hood (the specified grease hood is listed as having an attached make-up air plenum). Reference Section 508.1 IMC 2003.
02/05/2007 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
02/07/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. HPCU-7 is in the Multi-Purpose Building, not the Classroom Building. Please remove this from Ckt 3A-19,21,23 on Sheet E502.
2. Ckt 4E-38 powers EWC on the Power Plan, and WH-2 on the panel schedule. Please clarify, and note that WH-2 is a gas WH according to the Water Heater Schedule on Sheet P301, and that WH-2 is addressed on Panel 4C Ckt 20.
3. Provide a disconnecting means for the ADA Door Opener. Reference Keynote 17 Sheet E102.
4. Catering Kitchen has monoplex receptacle on 4C-46. No such circuit on panel schedule.
5. 4D-18,20 please provide electrical load on panel schedule. Reference Keynote 14 Sheet E102.
6. Indicate panel and circuit for motorized bleachers, Keynote 2 Sheet E102.
7. Provide an electrical circuit for the exterior receptacle on the south side of the Multi-Purpose Building.
8. It appears that Ckt "4C-18", as it appears on Sheet E103, should read "4A-18."
9. AC-7 is 55.8 FLA on Sheet E503, and 77.7 FLA on Packaged H & C Schedule Sheet M201. Coordinate with Mechanical and clarify. Carry through to Electrical Service Load Calculation as necessary.
10. It appears that Ckts 4E-8, 4E-10, and 4E-12 do not account for all the lighting on the panel schedules.
11. Ckt 4A-20 powers motorized shades according to Sheet E102 and the panel schedule. On Sheet 302 this circuit powers night lights.
12. On Panel 4C, the load on Ckt 29 appears to be 0.7 kVA, not 0.5, and the load on Ckt 42 appears to be 1.0 kVA, not 0.3. Taking into account the addition of 25% for the largest motor, it appears that the load on Phase C is 28.9 kVA, not 26.7, for 240A, not 223, which would overload the 225A bus and 200A feeder. Carry through to Electrical Service Load Calculation as necessary.
13. If the Gate Operators are 5 HP at 208V 3-ph, they would draw about 16.7A each. Please re-evaluate the 20A circuit for two motors, unless they are not expected to operate simultaneously.
14. The tap to the West Gate Operator does not comply with NEC 240.21 (B) (5).
15. Please define the line side and load side devices in the Series Ratings noted on the Panel Schedules, and their line side and load side values. Note that as fully rated panels, they would be rated for the AFC per the calculations on Sheet E503.
16. Please note that the Tucson Lighting Code does require a schedule on the plans with the mean lumens for each exterior fixture, quantity of each type, and whether such fixture is FCO or unshielded. Reference Section 8.6 a. This would pertain to new fixtures added this project, Line 2 of Outdoor Lighting Code Considerations Sheet E306.
02/16/2007 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
02/22/2007 SUZANNE BOHNET ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plans cannot be approved until the revised development plan has been approved and stamped as a Site Plan.
02/27/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied Once the building plans have been approved by the building code division, please return to the zoning review counter for an over the counter review. Please provide two copies of the last approved site/development plan to be inserted into the set of building plans and to allow zoning staff to review the project. Note, that if the plan is a development plan, please obtain a site plan application (for record keeping purposes only) at the permit counter prior to walk through - this will allow the conversion of the DP to a site plan for immediate records keeping. Staff will stamp the DP as a site plan as well.
02/27/2007 LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied February 22, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK
Tucson Appl. No. T07CM00243
Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.013

Shane Chism
ABA Architects
1001 N. Alernon Way # 175
Tucson, Arizona 85711


Re: Plan Review: San Miguel Catholic High School – Bldg D – Structural Only
Address: 6601 S. San Fernando Rd


Dear Mr. Chism,

Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson:

Plans: One (1) set of building plans (121 sheets, G101 through E801) dated January 18, 2007 by Ronald H. Schneider of Schneider & Associates Structural Engineers.

Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets of calculations, dated January 17, 2007 by Ronald H. Schneider of Schneider & Associates Structural Engineers.

Geotechnical Report: One (1) set of soils report dated August 5, 2004. by Oleg B. Lysy J of Terracon.

Miscellaneous: One (1) set of Construction Documents dated January 2007 by ABA Architects.


These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC).

Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded.


Sincerely,

Bureau Veritas North America



Randy McCoy
ICC Plans Examiner





RM:pc s:\Tucson\1007-161001.013pc1
enclosures

Re: Stories: One
Occupancy/Const.: E/VB
Building Area (sq. ft.): 6904 (multi-purpose room)


A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code.

B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance.

C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.).


GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

Low Roof framing plan does not correspond with framing plan in the structural calculations. Please clarify.

High Roof framing plan does not correspond with the structural calculations. Please clarify.

Outdoor basketball court framing plan does not correspond with the structural calculations. Please clarify.

Beams B9, B10, B11, B12, B13, and B14 are not represented in the structural calculations.

Beam B5 in structural calculations specify a W12x19 but in the beam schedule B5 is HSS6 x 2 x 5/16. Please clarify.

Beam B6 in structural calculations specifies a W18 x 46, but in the Beam Schedule, B6 is a HSS6 x 2 x 5/16. Please clarify.

Beam B7 in structural calculations specifies a HSS8 x 4 x ¼, but in the Beam Schedule B7 is HSS6 x 4 x ¼. Please clarify.

Beam B8 is structural calculations specifies a HSS20 x 8 x 1/2, but in Beam Schedule B8 is HSS8 x 3 x ¼. Please clarify.

Lintel LT5 in structural calculations specifies a HSS4 x 4 x ¼, but in the Beam Schedule LT5 is 32 “ deep with 2” #5 bottom. Please clarify.

Lintel LT7 in structural calculations specifies a concrete & steel lintel, but in the Beam Schedule LT7 is a HSS6 x 6 x 1/4. Please clarify.

Columns C1, C2, C3 in column (c) schedule do not correspond with C1, C2, and C3 in structural calculations. Please clarify.


If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Randy McCoy at (520) 820-1980 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/01/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/01/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed