Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T07CM00242
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/31/2007 | BETSY COTTLE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 02/05/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Include all fixtures when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 2003. 2. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out sheet P102, including its maximum approved depth. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2003. 3. Provide listing information for the shower control valves to show that they comply with the requirements of Section 420.0, UPC 2003, and specifically ASSE 1016. 4. Provide waste and vent isometrics for Building C. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 5. Provide water isometrics for Building C. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. |
| 02/05/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/06/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | All air supplied to a restroom shall be exhausted; revise the balancing data for room 311. Reference Section 403.2.1 (3), IMC 2003. |
| 02/07/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. FC-1 and FC-2 are on 3A-25,27. Please correct this on the Power Plan by FC-1. 2. On Panel 3B, Sheet E502, please fill in the electrical load for Ckt 29. 3. Provide an electrical circuit for CU-1. 4. Fill in electrical loads on panel schedule 3A-16, 3A-18, 3A-20, 3A-22, 3B-10, 3B-38. 5. Fixtures G, C, and X on the west side of Classroom 301 do not appear to have a panel/circuit number. 6. Bottom of Building Lighting Plan Sheet E301 refers to 4A-18 for bollards and other lighting. This circuit powers EF7 and EF8 on the panel schedule. Do you mean "3A-18?" 7. Note 4 under Fault Current Considerations implies a 3-tiered rating, which is not available commercially. 8. Fault calculations for panels 2A, 2C, 2B, and 2D are inapplicable to this project, as they pertain to existing panels on an existing service. 9. It appears that the AFC at Panels 3A and 3B is within their fault current ratings, thus rendering the information referenced above to be inapplicable and confusing. 10. Please note that the Tucson Lighting Code does require a schedule on the plans with the mean lumens for each exterior fixture, quantity of each type, and whether such fixture is FCO or unshielded. Reference Section 8.6 a. This would pertain to new fixtures added this project, Line 2 of Outdoor Lighting Code Considerations Sheet E306. |
| 02/16/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2007 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plans cannot be approved until the revised development plan has been approved and stamped as a Site Plan. |
| 02/27/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Once the building plans have been approved by the building code division, please return to the zoning review counter for an over the counter review. Please provide two copies of the last approved site/development plan to be inserted into the set of building plans and to allow zoning staff to review the project. Note, that if the plan is a development plan, please obtain a site plan application (for record keeping purposes only) at the permit counter prior to walk through - this will allow the conversion of the DP to a site plan for immediate records keeping. Staff will stamp the DP as a site plan as well. |
| 02/27/2007 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | February 22, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T07CM00242 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.012 Shane Chism ABA Architects 1001 N. Alernon Way # 175 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Re: Plan Review: San Miguel Catholic High School – Bldg C – Structural Only Address: 6601 S. San Fernando Rd. Dear Mr. Chism, Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: One (1) set of building plans (121 sheets) dated January 18, 2007 by Ronald H. Schneider of Schneider & Associates Structural Engineers. Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets of calculations, dated January 17, 2007 by Ronald H. Schneider of Schneider & Associates Structural Engineers. Geotechnical Report: One (1) set of soils report dated August 5, 2004. by Oleg B. Lysy J of Terracon. Miscellaneous: One (1) set of Construction Documents dated January 2007 by ABA Architects. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Randy McCoy ICC Plans Examiner RM:pc s:\Tucson\1007-161001.012pc1 enclosures Re: Stories: One Occupancy/Constr.: E/VB Building Area (sq. ft.): 6904 (classroom) A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Outdoor basketball court framing plan does not correspond with the structural calculations. Please clarify. Low Roof and trellis framing plan does not correspond with framing plan in structural calculations. Sloped roof framing plan does not correspond with framing plan in structural calculations. Beams B9, B10, B11, B12, B13, and B14 are not represented in the structural calculations. Beam B5 in structural calculations specify a W12 x 19, but in the Beam Schedule B5 is HSS6 x 2 x 5/16. Please clarify. Beam B6 in structural calculations specifies a W18 x 46, but in the Beam Schedule, B6 is a HSS6 x 2 x 5/16. Please clarify. Beam B7 in structural calculations specifies a HSS8 x 4 x ¼, but in the Beam Schedule B7 is HSS6 x 4 x ¼. Please clarify. Beam B8 is structural calculations specifies a HSS20 x 8 x 1/2, but in Beam Schedule B8 is HSS8 x 3 x ¼. Please clarify. Lintel LT5 in structural calculations specifies a HSS4 x 4 x ¼, but in the Beam Schedule LT5 is 32 “ deep with 2” #5 bottom. Please clarify. Lintel LT7 in structural calculations specifies a concrete & steel lintel, but in the Beam Schedule LT7 is a HSS6 x 6 x 1/4. Please clarify. Columns C1, C2, C3 in column (c) schedule do not correspond with C1, C2, and C3 in structural calculations. Please clarify. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Randy McCoy at (520) 820-1980 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/01/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |