Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM05771
Parcel: 13707034B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T06CM05771
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/09/2006 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please add the following automatic sprinkler criteria to the plans:

1. The hazard classification of the occupancy including any special hazards.
2. The design standard to be used.
3. The availability and adequacy of the water supply.
4. The design density and the area of operation.
11/09/2006 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/09/2006 BETSY COTTLE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
11/15/2006 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003.
11/16/2006 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the "drain trough" detail referenced on sheet M1.0. Clarify how (or if) this relates to the 10" storm drain (with seven 4" roof drains attached) shown on sheet C1. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
2. Coordinate the water service for the building and for irrigation use with sheet C1. Show the location and size of the backflow preventor and the meter. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
11/16/2006 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/20/2006 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Chicanos Por La Causa - Retail
305 W. Irvington Road
T06CM05771
Building Plan (1st Review)


TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 20, 2006

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\grading\t06cm05771.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents
11/29/2006 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied An approved site plan is required prior to building plan approval.
11/30/2006 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/01/2006 WILDAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied November 30, 2006

City of Tucson Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85701

RE: CHICNOS POR LA CAUSA SHELL – 1ST REVIEW
CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T06CN05771
WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-6082

The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable.

This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2003 IMC, 2003 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 2003 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan.

Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Chris Kiel.

Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms
M 330* VB 10,200 Yes No

Special Inspection is required for the following items:
Field Welding
Expansion/Epoxy anchors

The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals:
Wood I-Joists

GENERAL COMMENTS:
General
A signed special inspection form from the City of Tucson is required at the time that the plans are resubmitted for a back check. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy.

A deferred submittal letter for wood I-Joists will need to be forwarded directly to the Building Official and approved prior to the plans being delivered to the City. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy.

ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
Sheet T1.0
Please revise the occupant load calculation to use 30sf/occupant per table 1004.1.2 of the 2003 IBC.


Sheet A0.1
Please specify the distance from the rear of the building to the property line in order to verify compliance with table 602 of the 2003 IBC.

Sheet A2.0
Please specify the location of safety glazing in order to verify compliance with section 2406 of the 2003 IBC.

It is suggested to provide information regarding the door hardware in order to verify compliance with section 1008.1.8.3 of the 2003 IBC as opposed to addressing this issue during the future tenant improvements.

Please provide a COMcheck for the building envelope in order to verify compliance with section 2003 IECC. In addition, please specify on the plans the U-values for the doors and windows.

Sheet A6.0
Please coordinate the information regarding the installation of the mechanical units between the architectural, structural and mechanical sheets per section 106.1.1 of the 2003 IBC. The current submittal denotes the installation of the units in the mechanical sheets, but the architectural and structural sheets denote differently.

Please provide permanent access to the rooftop mechanical units in accordance with section 306.5 of the 2003 IMC. In addition, please provide additional information for the ladder assembly for access between the different roof areas to verify compliance with section 306.5 of the 2003 IMC.


STRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
Sheet S2.0
Please verify the use of detail 104 at the porch columns per section 106.1.1 of the 2003 IBC. In addition, please specify where details 108 and 109 are used.

Sheet S3.0
Please specify the mechanical unit locations and weights on the roof-framing plan per section 106.1.1 of the 2003 IBC.

Please coordinate the size of LT3 between the structural calculations and the plans per section 106.1.1 of the 2003 IBC (1/4” vs. 3/16”).

PLUMBING COMMENTS:
Please refer to the City’s comments.

MECHANICAL COMMENTS:
Please refer to the City’s comments.

ELECTRICAL COMMENTS:
Reviewed and approved by the City of Tucson.


ENERGY CODE COMMENTS:
Reviewed and accepted.

ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS:
Reviewed and accepted.

Sincerely,

WILLDAN




Martin Haeberle, C.B.O.
Building Official

MAH/tb

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/01/2006 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/01/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed