Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T06CM02975
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: APPLICANT/Development Services, Plans Coordinator/Variance Division/CDRC FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM02975, 3007 W. Via de Suenos, new residence, SR zoning Site plan, 2nd review (T06CM02975) & HDZ review (T06SA00248) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2008 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, stating how Zoning Review comments were addressed OR resubmit plans with variance paperwork. 1. IMPORTANT: The Hillside Overlay Zone application, T06SA00248, was not resubmitted to CDRC-only the site plan package was resubmitted. As a courtesy, zoning reviewed the project for BOTH site plan and Hillside Overlay criteria. It is REQUIRED that the HDZ plan package is resubmitted to CDRC, though zoning has reviewed the HDZ without the HDZ CDRC package - as other divisions need to do their reviews. 2. The site plan meets all site plan criteria. Once the Hillside Overlay Zone application can be approved, the site plan can be approved by zoning. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE COMMENTS: 3. Per LUC 2.8.1.8.A, the maximum height of a residence in the HDZ is 24'. This height is measured overall from the lowest point of grade at a wall to the roof line. The plans show a height from grade at the garage to the height of the roof at the 2nd story above the garage at 30'4" - not including the parapet wall at the 2nd story, which appears to extend another 3'. The residence is too tall, per diagram in Section 2.8.1.8.A of the Land Use Code. A variance to this section of the LUC must be obtained to allow the residence to be constructed as proposed. 4. This memorandum shall serve as the Official Referral to the Board of Adjustment variance process. Please contact Russlyn Wells at 837-4948 for an appointment to discuss and apply for the variance. 5. Should you obtain a variance, resubmit the plan review package to BOTH the CDRC DIVISION and the PERMIT DIVISION of Development Services - include copies of Board of Adjustment variance paperwork in all sets of the plans. The plans will then be distributed to all reviewers who need to examine the plans. PLEASE NOTE -the plan package can be re-reviewed by staff - but not approved -until AFTER the appeal deadline that will be noted on the final variance memorandum. Plans can be approved AFTER that appeal deadline. If you have questions, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonzag.gov or at 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM02975 3007 w via de suenos 2.doc |
| 02/11/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | SUBJECT: 3007 W Via De Suenos HDZ Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06SA00248, T06CM02975, T07BU01547 SUMMARY: The revised residential overlay and site/grading plans were received and reviewed by Engineering. The Overlay package was submitted and reviewed with the revised site/grading plans. Accuracy of data appears to be within a reasonable tolerance; ACS calculation for this parcel is accepted. Engineering recommends approval of the Overlay review, and recommends conditional approval of the site / grading plan review. SITE/GRADING PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) LUC Sec.2.8.1.6.A: Per response letter, geotechnical report was submitted, yet none was provided in package. Submit geotechnical letter/report to address the following: a) Assure proposed slope surface treatments for cut and fill slopes match geotechnical report. b) Provide a geotechnical report that provides minimum slope recommendations for the site. c) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: Condition of grading will be that the slope in the interceptor swale is no steeper than 3:1(H:V), with minimum of 30-in bottom width, if no geotechnical engineering letter is submitted. 2) Provide estimated cut/fill quantities for permitting purposes. Submittal of geotechnical Report is required to address the above items. Submit 3 copies of the revised site / grading plan if needed to address comments. For questions or to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/10/2008 | BUREAU VERITAS | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | March 3, 2008 CITY OF TUCSON - SECOND CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T06CM02975 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.002 Mr. Rodolfo Garcia 5518 S. Bryant Ave Tucson, Arizona 85706 Re: Plan Review: Garcia Residence Address: 3007 W. Via De Suenos Dear Mr. Garcia, Bureau Veritas North America has completed a second review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: Two sets of plans (17 sheets, 1A through 16) undated by Design Innovations Structural Calculations: Two sets dated 2/07 by Mardonio Talavera Soils Report: Two sets (#07-190) dated 6/18/07 by Pattison Evanoff Engineering Drainage Report: Two sets dated 8/10/07 by Patterson Hydrology Drainage Engineering These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2006 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2006 IRC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Adam Sessions/tm Adam Sessions ICC Plans Examiner ARS:tm s:/tucson\01007-161001.002pc2 enclosures Re: Stories: Two Occupancy: R-3 Construction type: VB Building Area (sq. ft.): 2325 (1st floor livable) 740 (2nd floor livable) 1085 (porch) 1174 (garage) 5324 Total sq. ft. A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and refer to the 2006 International Residential Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Remove all references to the 2000 and the 2003 IRC. There are many throughout the plans. Please check plans carefully. Update all of the evaluation report names and numbers. ICBO no longer exists. The reports should all be identified as ICC ESR (Evaluation Service Reports) followed by the number. The cross sections, foundation plan, and framing plans refer to details on sheet 9. Please update this reference using the correct sheet number. FLOOR PLAN COMMENTS: Specify use of open space next to stairs on second floor. It appears to be open to below. Please identify this area on the floor plan. Locate and identify heights of all ceilings. Include hallways, utility rooms, garages and walk-in closets. Provide this information for the second floor. R305 Show that each water closet is located in a clear space not less than shown in IRC Figure 307.1. This item has not been addressed. Provide dimensions to show required clearances. STAIR REQUIREMENTS: At the stair detail, show the updated code sections. All code references in this detail are incorrect. Amend the tread and riser table to show a riser height and tread depth for the front porch stair that is code compliant. Also, the number of risers should equal the number of treads plus one. Please revise. FIREPLACE REQUIREMENTS: Specify make and model number and provide the approval number of the testing agency for the fireplaces. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Provide combustion air for all gas appliances including size, type, and location of openings. IRC G2407 PLUMBING COMMENTS: Show vent location and termination for garage plumbing. Provide the length of gas line (horizontal and vertical) to each appliance. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Indicate the size (rating) of the sub panels. IRC Section E3305.2. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Adam Sessions at (623) 932-9951 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F. |
| 12/24/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit two copies of the approved Overlay Zone Plans (Case # T06SA00248) for reference. The application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews. |
| 12/31/2007 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |