Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM02086
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Have Engineer sign and date seal. |
| 09/27/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The following information must be included on the Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan for the Plant Inventory Methodology. A. A Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan on an aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the locations of the following. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a note on the plans stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. 1. Limits of all areas to be graded. 2. Location of proposed roads and utility easements. 3. Existing topographic contours at 2-foot maximum contour intervals. 4. Disposition of all Protected Native Plants keyed to the inventory list and showing the following designations: a. Plants to be preserved-in-place. b. Plants to be salvaged and transplanted on-site. To the extent possible, plants should be transplanted directly to their permanent location on-site. c. Plants to be salvaged and removed from the site. d. Plants to be destroyed. 5. The location of a temporary holding nursery to be used for salvaged plants. Salvage and Mitigation Report that details: 1. A summary by genus and species that details the total numbers of all Protected Native Plants inventoried. 2. The calculations used to determine, by genus and species, the numbers of replacement plants, if any, to be provided as mitigation for Protected Native Plants transplanted on-site, removed from the site, or destroyed. For assistance in determining these calculations, see Exhibit I, Native Plant Preservation Worksheet. Any required landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location on the landscape plans. Any project that does not have required landscape plans shall have a landscape mitigation plan prepared to show the disposition of PIP, TOS, and required mitigation, as shown in the summary. 2. A schedule of salvage work to be accomplished including the timing and phasing of all tree boxing, tree and cacti salvage, and grading operations to take place on-site. See Sec. 2-15.4.0. 4. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to salvaged plants in a temporary holding area. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to PIP, TOS, and mitigation plant materials. A method to provide irrigation to plants may include water harvesting for areas that are to remain natural. Provide an NPP plan that meets submittal criteria. |
| 09/29/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The following information must be included on the Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan for the Plant Inventory Methodology. A. A Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan on an aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the locations of the following. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a note on the plans stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. 1. Limits of all areas to be graded. 2. Location of proposed roads and utility easements. 3. Existing topographic contours at 2-foot maximum contour intervals. 4. Disposition of all Protected Native Plants keyed to the inventory list and showing the following designations: a. Plants to be preserved-in-place. b. Plants to be salvaged and transplanted on-site. To the extent possible, plants should be transplanted directly to their permanent location on-site. c. Plants to be salvaged and removed from the site. d. Plants to be destroyed. 5. The location of a temporary holding nursery to be used for salvaged plants. Salvage and Mitigation Report that details: 1. A summary by genus and species that details the total numbers of all Protected Native Plants inventoried. 2. The calculations used to determine, by genus and species, the numbers of replacement plants, if any, to be provided as mitigation for Protected Native Plants transplanted on-site, removed from the site, or destroyed. For assistance in determining these calculations, see Exhibit I, Native Plant Preservation Worksheet. Any required landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location on the landscape plans. Any project that does not have required landscape plans shall have a landscape mitigation plan prepared to show the disposition of PIP, TOS, and required mitigation, as shown in the summary. 2. A schedule of salvage work to be accomplished including the timing and phasing of all tree boxing, tree and cacti salvage, and grading operations to take place on-site. See Sec. 2-15.4.0. 4. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to salvaged plants in a temporary holding area. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to PIP, TOS, and mitigation plant materials. A method to provide irrigation to plants may include water harvesting for areas that are to remain natural. Provide an NPP plan that meets submittal criteria. |
| 10/02/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: FURR'S CAFETERIA - Southeast Corner of Broadway & Pantano T06CM02086 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Again this site plan does not meet the minimum requirements of Development Standards 2-02.0 Site Plan Content and Specifications. I choose sheet 5 of 17 as the site plan for this review. Due to the lack of required information additional comments may be fore coming. 2. Provide a drawings index on sheet one. 3. All references to "MAG STD DTL" need to be removed from the plan. All standard details should reference Pima County/City of Tucson Standard details with the appropriate detail called out. 4. The location map shows the proposed project bordering on both Broadway and Pantano. Revise the location of the project to show correctly. Also the proposed project should be shown centered on the location map. 5. It appears that this project is comprised of three (3) possibly four (4) different parcels. The boundary dimensions do not appear to reflect any combination of lots shown on the Assessor's Record Map. Please clarify. Prior to approval of the site plan the parcels will need to be combined. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. Copies of the lot combo covenant & tax combo attached 6. Provide a general note on the plan stating, "The proposed use is Food Service "28", subject to: subject to LUC section 3.5.4.6.A and C. 7. Provide the property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 8. Provide size, height overhangs and canopies and use for proposed buildings. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 9. Provide the required zoning setbacks. From Pantano the required setback is 21 feet or the height of the proposed building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of future curb. From all other property lines the required setback is 0'. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 and LUC 3.2.6.4 & 3.2.6.5 10. Provide off-street parking, including fully dimensioned layout, parking spaces' size and number, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 11. Post barricades or wheel stops designed to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping must be provide adjacent to any landscape area or a 30" vehicle overhang must be shown on the plan. D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 If a 30" vehicle overhang is to be used the overall depth of the parking space may be reduced to 15'-6" in these areas. See Figure 5. Wheel Stop Curbing D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 12. Post barricades or wheel stops designed to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent walls must be provided. D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 Along Pantano Road dimension the distance from the face of the curb to the proposed screen wall or provide curb stops per Figure 5. Wheel Stop Curbing D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 13. Post barricades or wheel stops designed to prevent parked vehicles from overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas must be provided around the proposed building. D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 If the proposed sidewalk is wider then 6'-6" then the existing curbing can be used a the curb stop. As no dimensions are provided for the proposed sidewalks it is unclear if the minimum sidewalk width is maintained. 14. Provide off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 and D.S. 2-09.0 Supplement 9. 15. Show the future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVT's) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 16. Provide widths of all driveways and parking area access lanes (PAALs) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 17. Pedestrian access easements will be required for any portion of the public sidewalk along Pantano Road, located at the north end of the property, which is located with in the property boundary. 18. The required pedestrian circulation/accessible route shown on the plan as coming from the main entrance of the building directly west to Pantano Road does not appear to meet the requirements for the accessible route. D. S. 2-08.3.1. It is not clear how access is gained from the sidewalk near the proposed building to the striped access isle. There should be a curb access ramp at this point. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 19. Provide dimensions for all sidewalks. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 20. All curb access ramps require detectable warnings, truncated domes per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 21. There does not appear to be any access from the proposed handicapped parking spaces to the sidewalk along the west side of the building, clarify. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 22. Provide size and height of proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 23. Provide fully dimensioned loading spaces and maneuvering area. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 24. Dimension the right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 25. If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 26. Provide the proposed lighting layout and type. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 27. Provide the existing zoning for the parcel and adjacent parcels. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 The existing zoning for the proposed site is shown as C2 but the parcels involved in this project are zoned C1. 28. Provide on the plan the existing and proposed use. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.30 29. Provide the following calculations on the plan: D.S. 2-02.2. Gross lot area Floor area for the building Floor Area Ratio LUC 3.2.11 Vehicular and bicycle parking spaces required and provided, including handicapped. LUC 3.3.4 Number of loading spaces required and provided. LUC 3.4.1 30. There is a portion of the parcel not shown on the plan, on the plan at the west end of this parcel there is a lot line shown with a dimension of 90.0'. This is not a separate parcel, remove this lot line and show the remainder of the parcel on the plan, or provide a key plan that indicates what the use of the parcel will be. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm02082nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/05/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments |
| 10/30/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | November 2, 2006 Site and Grading Review: Furr's Fresh Buffet T06CM02086 and T06BU00873 Loren Makus, E.I.T. The site and grading plans for the proposed Furr's Cafeteria at 51 S Pantano Road cannot be approved at this time. Since a complete drainage submittal was not provided with the site plan the plans cannot be approved at this time. Once a complete submittal is received, additional comments will be forthcoming. The following comments must be addressed: Drainage Report Comment: 1. The submitted drainage report does not meet the standards of the City of Tucson. Provide a drainage report that addresses the requirements of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona (SMDDFM) and the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (SDRM). Specifically refer to SMDDFM sections 2.3 and SDRM Chapter V. Additional information can be found in Chapter XIV of the SMDDFM. Site/Grading Comments: 2. Provide a plan that is clearly marked as the site plan and that provides the information required by the City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 2-02.0. All of the required elements must be provide on this plan. 3. As previously commented, show on the site plan the location of each driveway on each adjacent property. Driveways must be at least 80 feet apart on MS&R streets.. The measurement is taken at the point of tangency for the curb return.(Transportation Access Management Guidelines) 4. As previously commented, show on the site plan maneuverability for Solid Waste vehicle access to the compactor. The access must provide for 40 feet of clear, straight access to the compactor. SWPPP comments: The stormwater pollution prevention plan does not meet the minimum requirements of the construction general permit. The SWPPP must 5. Remove the statement that drywells will be installed from the sequence of events. 6. Identify the wash adjacent to the site as a receiving water. The wash is Owens Park Wash. 7. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 8. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 9. Part IV.C.2.a. Describe the project's intended use after NOT is filed 10. Part IV.C.2.d. Provide an estimate of the pre-construction runoff coefficient a 11. Part IV.C.2.e. Include a general location map (e.g. U.S.G.S. quadrangle, portion of a city or county map) showing 1 mile radius around site 12. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. 13. Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the map drainage patterns and estimated slopes after grading 14. Part IV.C.3.b. Identify on the map areas of soil disturbance Identify on the map areas not to be disturbed 15. Part IV.C.3.c. Identify on the map locations of structural and nonstructural controls identified in the SWPPP. 16. Part IV.D.2.a. Describe the erosion and sediment controls designed to retain sediment on site to the extent practicable. Provide clear descriptions and details for all inlet protection. Provide scheduling instructions as well. 17. Part IV.D.8.c. Describe BMPs for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge. If concrete trucks are not allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete of drum wash water on site, provide a description of the program to be used to prevent such discharges from becoming pollutants elsewhere. 18. Part IV.F. Include copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2003-001), NOI and ADEQ authorization as part of the SWPPP 19. Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP 20. Tucson Code 26-42.b The SWPPP must be prepared and certified by an engineer or landscape architect. 21. Review all of the SWPPP document to ensure that it describes this project. For example, there are several references to drywells. No drywells have been proposed for this site. If you have any questions about these comments or if you wish to set up a meeting contact me at 520.791.5550 Ext 1160 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/20/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/20/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |