Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM00831
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 12, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM00831 PROJECT NAME: City of Tucson Westside Police Service Center PROJECT ADDRESS: 1310 West Miracle Mile PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed and indicate the location of plan correction. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Please know the comments were made based on a review of the site plan sheet A1.4. 2. Revise the line weight of the property line along Flowing Wells Road to be the same weight throughout the entire line. 3. It is difficult to distinguish between the sight visibility triangle' s (SVTs) and the future curb location. Use a different line weight and/or line type for the future curb location. 4. Lighten the line weight for all SVTs in effort for the required ROW information to be visible on the plan view. 5. Existing and future Right of Way (ROW) dimensions and labels must be clearly indicated and distinguishable on the site plan. Dimension from the centerline of Flowing Wells Road the 50' future half ROW width. Please refer to redlines on sheet A1.4. Label the dimension, "50' Future ROW." DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 6. It appears the width of the future sidewalk is 4' for Flowing Wells and Miracle Mile. Both streets are designated as an arterial road and the required future sidewalk width is 6'. Revise the site plan to show all future sidewalks at 6'. 7. Revise the all SVT's to show a 20' stem. DS 3-01.5.2.A. 8. Indicate the width of the existing sidewalk (keynote 21). 9. Indicate the width of the new concrete pedestrian walk (keynote 9). DS 2-08.4.1.B. 10. Keynote 13 specifies new dumpster locations. The response letter to the first review solid waste comment indicated existing and proposed solid waste enclosures are shown on the site plan sheet A1.4. Please note the referenced existing solid waste enclosure is not shown on the site plan. This is confusing. Please clarify. Are all solid waste enclosures new, existing or both? Be aware that both the proposed and existing infrastructure must meet current development standard requirements based on this is a full code compliance review. Do the existing solid waste enclosures meet the current standards? It is acknowledged per the response letter John Clark from Environmental Services has accepted the proposal, however any proposal not meeting Development Standard 6-01 must apply for a Development Standard Modification Request. Please clarify in detail in the response letter the current solid waste proposal and on the plan view. 11. Show the location of each catch basin on the plan view and indicate the improvement plan number for the storm drain system. S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.3.B.1. The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately been addressed. It is acknowledged site note number15 references the civil drawings for location of the catch basins and the improvement plan number. For plan clarify reference the specific sheet number(s) and keynote of the location of this information in site note 15. |
| 04/11/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
| 04/11/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the handicap parking calculation on sheet A 0.1. With a total of 547 total vehicle parking spaces provided, 11 h/c spaces are required. 2. Revise bicyle parking calculation and plan to show the required bicycle parking. With a total of 547 total vehicle parking spaces provided, a total of 8 percent or 44 bicycle parking spaces are required (50 % class 1 and 50 % class 2). 3. Include the proposed floor area ratio (FAR) in the calculations on sheet A 0.1 (proposed floor area divided by site area). LUC 3.2.11 4. Revise the vehicle parking calculation to be based on 1 required vehicle space per 250 square feet of floor area. With a total building area of 128,776 square feet, the required number of vehicle parking spaces is 515. LUC 3.3.4 5. Revise the loading calculation and the plan drawing to show the correct number of loading spaces required and provided. With a building area of 128.776 square feet, a total of 3 loading spaces are requried. LUC 3.4.5.4 6. Revise sight visibility triangles to have a 20-foot stem dimension rather than 22 feet. DS 3-01.5.2.A 7. Revise the adjacent zoning labels to be in the correct location on sheet A 0.1. Refer to City Zoning Maps for the correct adjacent zoning boundaries. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 |
| 04/11/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise landscape note 5 to specify that one canopy tree is required for every 10 vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. Revise calculation in note 14 accordingly. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1 2. Indicate on the landscape plan the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff will be used to benefit planting areas on the site. DS 2-07.0, LUC 3.7.4.3.B 3. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Add a note to the plan. |
| 04/24/2006 | MARTY DUPONT | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Disability Rights Section 950 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 E-MAIL AND STANDARD MAIL Liana Perez, Director Office of Equal Opportunity Programs and Independent Police Review City of Tucson 100 North Stone, Sixth Floor Suite 610 Tucson, AZ 85701 Re: West Side Police Service Center architectural plan review Project Civic Access DJ 204-8-205 Dear Ms. Perez: We have completed our review of the architectural plans dated January 16, 2006, and January 13, 2006, for the West Side Police Service Center. Our staff architect found the following elements that either did not meet the ADA Standards for Accessible Design or require clarifying information. Please note that this review is based only on what is shown in the drawings provided. If an accessibility issue is not addressed on the drawings, then we have not addressed it in this review. Therefore, it is unclear whether the architect for the project has addressed all relevant accessibility issues. To facilitate review, I have listed the page number from the plans where the problem was first noted, then briefly described the problem. The citations within the description are to the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (Standards), 28 C.F.R. pt. 36, App. A, unless otherwise noted. 1. Exterior circulation routes, Drawing C2.2- Detail “D” No detectable warnings are indicated on the curb ramp. § 4.7.7. Confirm the slopes of both the primary run and flared sides of the curb ramps provided. §§ 4.7.2, 4.7.5, Fig. 12(a). West Side Police Service Center DJ 204-8 -205 2. Meeting room 105 ramp, Drawing A2.1 3. a. There are no details for the ramp indicated in meeting room 105. Please provide the ramp details, including configuration, dimensions, slope, handrails, and other relevant elements. Doors, Drawing A2.2 The following doors have, or appear to have, insufficient side maneuvering clearance in either the push or pull direction. § 4.13.6, Fig. 25: door 020 door 122 door 124 door 231 door 233 door 306 door 305 No doors are indicated for the rooms listed below. If doors are, in fact, the design intent for any of these locations, and doors are provided, then confirm the door size, maneuvering clearance, and hardware. “Coffee/Copy” - room 307 “Files” - room 313 “Coffee/Copy” - room 314 Men’s locker room 504 and Flex locker room 511, Drawing A2.3 a. The locker rooms do not include at least one fixed bench 24 inches wide by a minimum of 48 inches long, wall-mounted along the longer dimension. § 4.35.4. Building signage, Drawing G7.0 a. Sign types “J,” and “Ja” indicate that the sign text is located above the pictogram. Verbal description should be placed directly below the pictogram. § 4.30.4. Water cooler, Drawing P1.2 a. Confirm provision of the electric water cooler “EWC” indicated in this drawing between Men’s Room 231 and Women’s Room 235, but not indicated in the floor plan drawing A2.2. Visual alarms, Drawing E2.1 a. No visual alarm is indicated in the following common use areas: Coffee/Copy rooms 307, 314, 404, and 603. § 4.28.1. Unknown symbol, Drawing E2.3 a. The definition of the electrical symbol which is similar to that of a wall mounted light fixture and containing the letter “A” is not found in the documents. This is presumed to be an element of the assistive listening system. If such is the case, please confirm and specify the equipment. Project Manual Detail Book Details 634, 643, 660: Confirm provision of the required clear floor space at the sinks, eye wash stations, and drinking fountains. § 4.24.5. Confirm that all fire extinguisher cabinets and fire extinguishers are accessible, are mounted within accessible reach ranges, have required clear floor space, and are not subject to the requirements for protruding objects. §§ 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.4.1, 4.27.2, 4.27.3, 4.27.4. Confirm mounting height for all toilet room fixtures, grab bars, mirrors, and other accessories. General comments a. No door hardware schedule was found among the submitted documents. Confirm the provision of accessible hardware throughout the facility. No plumbing fixture schedule was found among the construction documents. Confirm the provision of accessible fixtures and trim throughout the facility. Confirm that all toilet flush valves will be mounted on the wide, open, or transfer side of toilets. § 4.16.5. Confirm that all mechanical and electrical controls and devices are accessible, are mounted within accessible reach ranges, and have required clear floor space. §§ 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.27.2, 4.27.3, 4.27.4. If you have any questions, please contact me by phone at (202) 353-3759 or e-mail to Laura.Welp@usdoj.gov. I would be happy to arrange a call with our staff architect if this would be of assistance. Sincerely yours, Laura M. Welp, Esq. Investigator Disability Rights Section cc: Alison Colter-Mack |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/26/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |