Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU01916
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Please see previous comments by David Rivera. |
| 11/08/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape section has reviewed the grading plans but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering comments and concerns have been addressed. Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved tentative plat. |
| 11/22/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/22/2006 The Grading Plan can not be approved at this time. We offer the following comments: GRADING PLAN: 1. Provide in the submittal a copy of the Geotechnical Report, which include recommendations concerning the required setback from existing/proposed slopes whether they are created by a cut or a fill and the proposed slope treatment. Verify compliance with the Soils Report recommendation. 2. Include the submitted exhibit that demonstrates that proposed driveway slopes will not commends driveways slopes not to exceed 15% as a detail on the Grading Plan. 3. The drainage system, that includes channels and an 18" RCP north of Drexel Road and on both sides of Morning Shadow drive, needs to be addressed in this project Drainage Report. The system needs to be reviewed and approved before the PIA plans are sent to Permits and Codes for their review and approval. 4. The difference in elevations between the high points, on "C" Type Lots, and the low points (at lot frontages) is very minimal. It will be difficult to install and the slopes will not be sufficient to drain the water runoff. Revise as necessary. 5. Hand placed riprap on slopes between 2:1 and 3:1 is not acceptable unless the Soils Report's recommendation conflicts with this comment. Revise the affected details accordingly. 6. Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. SWPPP: The stormwater pollution prevention plan does not meet the requirements of the general permit. Please revise the SWPPP to address the following requirements. 1. Provide documentation to substantiate the effectiveness of the trench berms and the use of natural vegetation as perimeter sediment controls as indicated on the site map. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering If you have any questions regarding the Grading Plan comments, you may contact Laith Alshami at 791-5550 x1195 or at Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/29/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |