Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU01321
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved plans development plans including landscape, and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance with the approved documents and applicable codes and standards only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 06/20/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Preston Godfrey DATE: June 23, 2006 ABA Architects FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE 1001 N Alvernon Way Engineering Division Tucson, Arizona 85711 SUBJECT: Ronald McDonald House Grading Plan T04BU01321 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 29 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Grading plan clearly marked "GRADING PLAN". 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 3. Show limits of grading/limits of work. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 5. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 6. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. 7. Call out 18' radius on curb returns. 8. Provide a high point (6" high from the gutter line grade) in the driveway leading into the parking lot to prevent any nuisance stormwater from entering the site off of Allen Road. SWPPP 1. Provide a SWPPP report that addresses the responsibilities of the operators. The report should contain NOI's and forms that need to be submitted to ADEQ (i.e. each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and a copy to the City of Tucson. Provide copies of the NOIs in the narrative. (Part IV.F) ) 2. Illustrate flow arrows on this plan sheet. 3. Call out dimensions of the stabilized construction entrance 4. The southern portion of the project appears to be the high end in elevation, therefore consider providing an opening in the silt fencing to accept and contain any debri (carried by stormwater) due to the re-construction of Allen Road. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz, PE Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1191 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 08/01/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/01/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments for T06BU01321: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |