Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU01156
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/13/2006 The Grading Plan and SWPPP shall be approved once the following requirements have been satisfactorily addressed: GRADING PLAN: 1. The Tentative Plat has not been approved yet. The Grading Plan can not be approved until the Tentative Plat is approved. 2. Revise General Grading Note #27 to state the following: "a SWPPP inspection and a pre-construction meeting between the Contractor and Development Services Engineering Inspector is required before construction activities start. Call for SWPPP inspection and pre-construction meetings. for a DSD engineering inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a customer service representative at the development services department, or contact DSD engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML The Grading Plan shall be revised and resubmitted for approval. SWPPP: The stormwater pollution prevention plan does not meet the requirements of the general permit. Please revise the SWPPP to address the following requirements. We have received a copy of a letter from ADEQ after their review of a SWPPP for another project. Parts of this letter are applicable to this SWPPP and are reflected in the following comments. Furthermore, this SWPPP is very generic and provides very little specific direction to the operators. Comments from both ADEQ and EPA indicate that the SWPPPs must be specific and tailored to the project. The SWPPP must be revised to be specific to this site and to provide specific direction to the operators. The following comments are examples of elements that are incomplete or not sufficiently tailored to this site. The list is not all-inclusive but is representative. 1. Provide documentation to substantiate the effectiveness of the trench berms and the use of natural vegetation as perimeter sediment controls as indicated on the site map. 2. The plan sheets include several detail call outs, yet the details are not shown. Additionally, clarify the note below Detail #3, on Sheet 8 of 9, which states: "Typical Berm Layout Per Detail 4". Revise as needed. 3. As previously commented: Part IV.C.3.c. Identify and clearly label on the map locations of structural and nonstructural controls identified in the SWPPP. Include the location of the washout area, locations of storage areas. If the washout areas will be offsite, provide a program to demonstrate that the trucks will not be washing out illegally. Specify the location of the off-site cleaning area. The SWPPP must be revised to meet the requirements of these comments. The entire SWPPP must be revised to be specific and to provide specific instructions to all of the operators of the project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.791.5550 ext. 1161 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate If you have any questions regarding the Grading Plan comments, you may contact Laith Alshami at 791-5550 x1195 or at Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov Items to be resubmitted: Revised Grading Plan and SWPPP |
| 10/13/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | The Tentative Plat must be approved before the Grading Plans can be approved. Please see previous Zoning Review comments by David Rivera. |
| 10/19/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved tentative plat. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/25/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |