Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00873
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: FURR'S CAFETERIA - 51 S. Pantano T06BU00873 Grading Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2006 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu00873-3rd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/01/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved site plan. |
| 12/27/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | January 3, 2007 Site and Grading Review: Furr's Fresh Buffet T06CM02086 and T06BU00873 Loren Makus, E.I.T. The site and grading plans for the proposed Furr's Cafeteria at 51 S Pantano Road cannot be approved at this time. Please revise the drainage report, site and grading plans and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The following comments must be addressed: Drainage Report Comments: 1. The retention volume has not been calculated correctly. The runoff coefficients corresponding to the 5-year rainfall depth must be used in the retention volume calculation. The values of the coefficients can be from the table in the Drainage Manual or may be hydrologically determined using the procedure in the same manual. 2. Provide exhibits in the drainage report showing the off-site drainage features that affect the site, onsite drainage conditions, hydraulic improvements, and basins. 3. Demonstrate in the drainage report that the required retention volume will be directed to the proposed basins and show how the overflow will be controlled and directed to the proposed catch basins. The site plan must be revised to show the ponding limits of the basins/water harvesting areas for the 100-year event. 4. Provide an explanation for the function of the equalizer pipes between the basins. The proposed water surface elevations for the basins are different. 5. Revise the report to indicate that a floodplain use permit will be required for work in the public drainageway. Site/Grading Comments: 6. Add truncated domes to the "Disabled Parking Space" detail along the area where the sidewalk is flush with the pavement. 7. As previously commented, show on the site plan the location of each driveway on each adjacent property. Driveways must be at least 80 feet apart on MS&R streets. (Transportation Access Management Guidelines) 8. Revise the horizontal control plan so that notations are legible. There are many locations where lines and labels overlap and render the text unreadable. 9. Provide the correct reference to the Horizontal Control Plans in general note 6. SWPPP comments: The previous Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan comments were not addressed. The information presented on the ADEQ SWPPP checklist must be incorporated into the SWPPP. Please provide three copies of a revised SWPPP incorporating all of the requested changes and incorporating all of the applicable information from the ADEQ checklist. The SWPPP must be revised in accordance with the following comments: 10. Remove the statement that drywells will be installed from the sequence of events. 11. Identify the wash adjacent to the site as a receiving water. The wash is Owens Park Wash. 12. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). 13. Part IV.B.2.c Explicitly indicate in the SWPPP the name of the operator with operational control over day-to-day activities at the construction site. 14. Part IV.C.2.a. Describe the project's intended use after NOT is filed 15. Part IV.C.2.d. Provide an estimate of the pre-construction runoff coefficient a 16. Part IV.C.2.e. Include a general location map (e.g. U.S.G.S. quadrangle, portion of a city or county map) showing 1 mile radius around site 17. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. 18. Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the map drainage patterns and estimated slopes after grading 19. Part IV.C.3.b. Identify on the map areas of soil disturbance Identify on the map areas not to be disturbed 20. Part IV.C.3.c. Identify on the map locations of structural and nonstructural controls identified in the SWPPP. 21. Part IV.D.2.a. Describe the erosion and sediment controls designed to retain sediment on site to the extent practicable. Provide clear descriptions and details for all inlet protection. Provide scheduling instructions as well. 22. Part IV.D.8.c. Describe BMPs for managing concrete truck washout and surplus concrete discharge. If concrete trucks are not allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete of drum wash water on site, provide a description of the program to be used to prevent such discharges from becoming pollutants elsewhere. 23. Part IV.F. Include copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2003-001), NOI and ADEQ authorization as part of the SWPPP 24. Part IV.J.1. Each Operator must sign the SWPPP 25. Tucson Code 26-42.b The SWPPP must be prepared and certified by an engineer or landscape architect. 26. Review all of the SWPPP document to ensure that it describes this project. For example, there are several references to drywells. No drywells have been proposed for this site. If you have any questions about these comments or if you wish to set up a meeting contact me at 520.791.5550 Ext 1160 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2007 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |