Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU00873
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 05/18/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | May 18, 2006 Site and Grading Review: Furr's Cafeteria T06CM02086 and T06BU00873 Loren Makus, E.I.T. The site and grading plans for the propoesed Furr's Cafeteria at 51 S Pantano Road cannot be approved at this time. Since a complete drainage submittal was not provided with the site plan the plans cannot be approved at this time. Once a complete submittal is received, additional comments will be forthcoming. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Show location of driveway on each adjacent property. Driveways must be at least 80 feet apart on MS&R streets.. The measurement is taken at the point of tangency for the curb return.(Transportation Access Management Guidelines) 2. Provide a drainage report. The report must address detention and retention requirements. Five year threshold retention and detention requirements. Provide sufficient hydraulic analysis to demonstrate that all-weather access will be provided. 3. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for this project does not meet the minimum requirements of the ADEQ Construction General Permit. ADEQ provides a checklist for SWPPP preparation. The SWPPP checklist can be obtained from the ADEQ website at: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf. Include a completed SWPPP checklist with the SWPPP. In the checklist clearly describe the location within the SWPPP for each required element. 4. Show maneuverability for Solid Waste vehicle access to the compactor. |
| 05/27/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/27/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2006 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/09/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |