Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM05118
Parcel: 107031890

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T05CM05118
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/28/2006 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Michael St.Paul
Planner Technician

PROJECT:
T05CM05118
2420 North Jackrabbit Avenue
Manufacturing
2nd site review
TRANSMITTAL:
January 28, 2006

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

There have been no changes to the site plan, nor has a response letter been provided to the last review. Please see the last set of comments.
01/28/2006 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning comments.
12/15/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/21/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Provide acceptable documentation (application for exception), which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site along with application for exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
12/21/2005 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee per LUC 3.2.4.3. Show right of way line(s) on landscape plan and if applicable provide approval documentation for any landscaping within ROW.

2. Provide a 30" continuous screen within landscape border to screen vehicle use areas form Jack Rabbit Ave per LUC 3.7.2-I.

3. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement per DS 2-06.3.7. Dimension buffers on landscape plan accordingly, include additional screening for vehicle use areas

4. Vegetative screens can encroach three (3) feet into the street landscape border. If the growing characteristics of selected plant material, at maturity, are of a width greater than three (3) feet, the plant location will be moved farther away from the street property line to allow for the growth.

5. The planting plan and layout will include sizes, and common and scientific name(s) of existing vegetation per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e Provide the botanical name for Green Palo Verde.


6. Provide a Maintenance Schedule on landscape plan with the following information:

· Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required.
· Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive.
· Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials.
· Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials.
· Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.

7. Provide acceptable documentation (application for exception), which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site along with application for exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
12/27/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 14, 2005
TO: HW BUD ACTIPIS for THREE DOG DANCER LLC
SUBJECT: 2420 N JACKRABBIT AV Building Addition Floodplain Preliminary Review
LOCATION: T13S R13E Section 34
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05OT02600 / T05CM05118

PRELIMINARY FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT REVIEW:
1) Tucson Code Section 26-11.2.(a): A preliminary review of your application for a floodplain use permit was performed. The application is not complete. Since the site may be affected by a jurisdictional flood, the floodplain ordinance compliance is required for this project. However, no drainage information was provided in the submittal package. A Drainage Report or sufficient drainage or hydrology study, is needed for the review of this Floodplain Use Permit submittal. The report should include FEMA discussion, erosion and/or flood protection improvements, as well as other necessary drainage information as listed in this section of the code as well as section of the Development Standards.
2) Tucson Code 26-11.2.(a)(1): Submit 3 sheets of the grading plans drawn to scale, showing the nature, location, dimensions and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, floodproofing measures, and the relationship of the above to the location of any watercourse channel, floodway, regulatory floodplain, erosion hazard area boundaries, and the regulatory flood elevation of the structures. All elevations or vertical distances must be referenced to an established datum or base elevation.
3) Tucson Code 26-4.1(a)(1): In order to determine substantial improvement in a flood hazard zone, submit monetary assessment of the project that includes the proposed improvements of the building addition, along with the value of the existing structure. See the following website for more information: http://www.floods.org/Certification/is9/unit8.pdf See especially pages 8-5 through 8-8.

Engineering Division of Development Services Department will generate a full review of the submittal package for T05CM05118 and T05OT02600 after the above preliminary comments are addressed. If you have questions please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE, CPM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
12/27/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied December 28, 2005
TO: Amco Enterprises, Inc.
SUBJECT: Site Plan: Building Addition, 2420 N Jackrabbit Avenue
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM05118

SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Permit Application were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on December 28, 2005. It was not approved. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:

1. Delineate, label and dimension the sight visibility triangles for each driveway/PAAL location. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) For details on the sight visibility triangles reference Development Standard 3-01.5.0
2. In the Drainage Statement, clarify the relation between the FEMA reference mark and the COT benchmark used as the basis of elevation for the Site Plan. Clarify whether the lowest floor elevation on the Site Plan is in reference to the COT datum or to the FEMA datum.
3. Revise the proposed refuse container to provide concrete-filled steel posts at the sides of the enclosure as well as at the back. There must be at least 10 feet clear between the posts on opposites sides of the enclosure. (DS 6-01.4.2.C)
4. Provide water surface contours for the watercourse/floodprone area. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.15)
5. Clarify the delineation of the proposed sewer easement (Key note 11). Use a distinct symbol to indicate the boundaries of the easement.
Grading Plan Comments
A grading permit is required for this project. A grading permit application was received. The Civil Improvements plan sheets should be revised in accordance with the following comments. The plans must also be revised to address any changes in the Site Plan.
1. Provide general dimensions for the basins, sidewalks, parking area access lanes and other site features.
2. Clearly delineate the extent of proposed grading.
3. Revise solid waste enclosure to provide concrete-filled steel posts at the sides as well as at the rear of the enclosure.

Revise the Site Plan and Grading Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of each for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions or if you wish to discuss any of these comments, I can be reached at 520.791-5550 ext 1161 or by email at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.
Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/02/2006 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/02/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed