Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05CM04691
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: M3 Engineering SUBJECT: 2965 E FAIRLAND SV resubmittal Site Plan and Grading Plan Review LOCATION: T15S, R14E, Section 24, Ward 5 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02254, T05CM04691 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the revised drainage report, site package report, two sets of the revised site and grading plans within the resubmittal package, and can recommend approval once the additional sets are received and stamped. Consultant came to the counter December 4, 2006, and stated they will be providing additional two sets as discussed at the counter which are needed prior to picking up permit. The two additional sets shall be received, approved, and stamped as the conditional approval. The following conditions will apply to the grading permit. The Hydrology Study dated 21NOV05 by M3 Engineering was accepted for this project. GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS: 1) Call for SWPPP inspection and Pre-construction meetings. For a DSD Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 2) Overlay zone application required. 3) Any disturbance within the 50-ft W.A.S.H. Ordinance Study Area will require the project to be stopped until a full W.A.S.H. Ordinance Report with W.A.S.H. Mitigation Plan is submitted for review and approval by DSD Engineering and then reviewed by stormwater committee(s). 4) There shall be no stockpiling, material storage, vehicle crossing/parking/storage or any type of grading activity within the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Study Area. 5) Heavy duty construction fence is required at west side of project to define limits of disturbance outside of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance Study Area. 6) There shall be no disturbance outside of grading limits as defined by the approved plans and as accepted by the initial inspection. 7) There shall be no disturbance of Railroad Wash and the 50-ft study area surrounding the top of bank as defined by the approved drainage report and the approved grading plan. 8) Additional percolation testing may be required at post-grading construction inspection. 9) All grading construction work shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standards Section 11-01. 10) See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be updated to show location of concrete washout area on SWPP sheet plan view. 11) A copy of the Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. 12) Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. 13) If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. 14) See the associated Site Plan T05CM04691. 15) Truncated domes are required for access ramps per ADAAG. This is an update to COT standard detail 207. 16) Temporary erosion control devices shall be placed at locations where stormwater runoff exits grading limits to prevent debris, construction silt, and/or chemicals from entering any drainage ways that eventually discharge into the receiving waters. 17) Contact Permits and Codes (791-5100) for any questions regarding right-of-way permit requirements. I can be reached at 791-5550, ext.2204 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 11/25/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/29/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. |
| 11/29/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a 30" continuous screen within landscape border to screen vehicle use area from Fairland Starv per LUC 3.7.2-I. Indicate the locations of screening elements and dimension landscape borders. 2. Note: The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement per DS 2-06.3.7. 3. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of 34 square feet in area and 4 feet in width, (as measured form the inside dimension) must be provided for each canopy tree within vehicle use area per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. Dimension planter areas on landscape plans 4. Add note to plan: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. 5. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. |
| 12/21/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul Planner Technician PROJECT: T05CM04691 2965 East Fairland Stravenue Manufacturing railroad ties Second review TRANSMITTAL: December 22, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. This review is for a site in the I-1 Zone. The use is General Manufacturing. The Development Designator is "34" and is subject to Section 3.5.5.1.B, .F, .G and .H. LUC Sec 2.7.2.2.A.2 2. Please provide the detail identification and location (Sheet CG503) either with Key Note 37 or on the site plan of Sheet CS102. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 3. The minimum length, of the access aisles for the handicapped accessible parking spaces, is the full length of the parking spaces. Please revise the handicapped detail on Sheet CG501. ICC/ANSI A117.1-3003 502.4.3 4. Please provide truncated domes at every handicapped accessible transition ramp. Please provide a detail of the accessible ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 406.12 & Sec 705.5 |
| 12/22/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning comments. |