Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM02137
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Submit three sets of grading plans and a completed grading permit application. Please refer to Tucson Code, Section 26-11.2 a (1 & 2) for items that must be provided on the plan, and Development Standard 11-01.0 for grading requirements. Assure a local benchmark with elevation is provided on the plan. |
| 08/04/2005 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CONSTRUCTION PLANS/DOCUMENTS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN RESUBMITTAL. APPLICANT NOTIFIED. SEE ORIGINAL CRITIQUE. DAVE WITT |
| 08/11/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM02137 1832 N. Dragoon St. New Duplex Site Plan Transmittal date: 2nd Review 8/11/05 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. There has been no building plans or site plan with changes resubmitted at this time. Following are the comments from the first review. Please resubmit a complete set of plans for review. The plan that has been resubmitted (Plot Plan/ Grading Plan) does not indicate the changes required as per the last review. 1. As per Residential Site Plan example item #3. Provide the lot dimensions and bearings. A search of the assessor's records indicates the lot dimensions indicated are not correct. The lot dimensions on the assessor's records are 84.5'x150'. Change the total lot area calculation also. 2. As per Residential Site Plan example item #3 Indicate the size of all proposed structures. The square footage indicated does not match the floor plan provided. Separate the porch areas from the living areas. 3. As per Residential Site Plan example item #8 Indicate the maximum height of the new structure. 4. As per Residential Site Plan example item #9 Provide the height of the exterior walls of the new structure measured from the average grade to the highest point under the roof. It appears the finished floor is 2' above the grade thus the height of the structure on the elevations is not correct. Clearly indicate on the site plan the building heights of all elevations. 5. As per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 the required perimeter setback for property with a perimeter yard indicator BB is 10' or ¾(H) of the structure which ever is greater. As per item #4 the height of the structure is unclear but appears to be approx. 16'-4" which would require a setback of 12'-3" from the north and south property lines. The floor plan as submitted indicates a 66'-6" long building, the site plan as submitted indicates a 11' setback from the north and south property lines for a total of 88'-6" distance with a lot dimension of only 84'-6". Depending on what is resubmitted a LDO may be required as well as further comments may be generated. 6. As per Residential Site Plan example item #11 Provide lot coverage calculation. Because of items #1 and #2 the lot coverage calculations are incorrect. Sidewalks are not to be considered as part of the vehicular use area. A total of four parking spaces are required for a duplex with a total of two bedrooms for each unit, as per LUC Sec. 3.3.4. A total of six parking spaces are indicated on the site plan, which will require the vehicular use area to meet all the requirements of DS 3-05 as well as any Landscaping requirements as per DS 2-06. (Note: An option is to remove 2 of the parking spaces, leaving four, which then would not require meeting DS3-05 and DS 2-06.) 7. As per Residential Site Plan example item #14 Clearly indicate the distance from the front of the structure to the street property line. 8. As per Residential Site Plan example item #16 Indicate the zoning on the property and the surrounding properties. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5608 ext. 2000. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/15/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |