Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM01056
Parcel: 114540630

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T05CM01056
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/10/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/14/2005 BOB SUBA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
03/30/2005 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1) Provide exit signs at required exit doors.
04/01/2005 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
04/01/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.3, International Energy Conservation Code 2000.
2. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference Section 803.2.8, IECC 2000.
3. Provide information to show that the make up air unit, EC-1, is listed and labeled. Reference Section 301.4, IMC 2000.
4. Provide information to show that the make up air for the kitchen hoods complies with Section 508.1.1, IMC 2000.
5. Provide service space for AC-1 per the manufacturer's listing requirements. Reference Section 306.6 IMC.
6. Confirm the specified electrical data (MCP and MOCP) for the rooftop air conditioning units is in accordance with the manufacturer's listing information. Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2000.
7. Revise the enclosing shaft for the grease ducts to provide a minimum separation of 6" between the duct and the shaft. Reference Section 506.3.11, IMC 2000.
8. Confirm that the Type I hoods have clearances to combustibles per Section 507.9, IMC 2000.
9. Show the mounting weight of the kitchen hoods and clarify how they are to be supported from the structure. If they are to be supported from the roof structure, show the hood locations on the roof framing drawing. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000.
10. Revise the size of the grease ducts to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference Section 506.3.5, IMC 2000.
11. Show that the exhaust fans, EF-1 and EF-5, comply with the requirements of Section 506, IMC 2000.
12. Show that the exhaust hoods for the pizza oven and the fryer comply with the requirements of Section 507, IMC 2000.
04/04/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
2. Provide a natural gas schematic showing the loads and developed lengths of the piping. Indicate the size of the gas supply to AC-2. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
3. Correct the note in detail 3/P.2 regarding the separation of plumbing vents from air intakes to comply with the requirements of Section 401.5.1, IMC 2000.
4. Show the inverts and slope of the building sewer on the drawing. The slope of the building sewer shall be at least ΒΌ" per foot unless it is shown to be impractical due to the depth of the public sewer or structural conditions. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 718.1, UPC 1994.
5. Replot the plumbing plan, using bolder lines for the waste piping for legibility. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
6. Show the size and configuration of the combustion air openings for the water heater. Reference Section 507, UPC 1994 as amended by the State of Arizona.
7. Provide insulation on the circulating hot water piping per Section 804.5, IECC 2000.
8. Appliances to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps may require reduced pressure principle backflow preventers. Please submit equipment sheets of the appliances for determination and specify the make and model of the proposed backflow device or assembly. Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994.
9. Provide clarify the design of the roof drains. Show the size of the drains (and scuppers) and show how the overflow will be handled. Reference Appendix D, UPC 1994.
04/05/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/06/2005 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
04/12/2005 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. Zoning will re-review and approve the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package.

2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/18/2005 KMEDINA1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed