Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM00872
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/01/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/08/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | assignment per JPV |
03/08/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C Correct and revised all sheets. 3. Indicate contour intervals along with the north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 4. Indicate legal property description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 5. Indicate project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 6. Indicate lot dimensions and bearings as per the legal descriptions. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 This project indicates four separate parcels. A lot combination may be required. See Zoning for more information. 7. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E Indicate a dimensioned detail for downspout and sidewalk scupper. 8. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles for all street intersections and driveways to streets. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 See Sheet C1.1 for redline SVT locations. D.S.3-01.5.2 & 3 9. Clearly identified vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The minimum acceptable width for two-way paved roadway is 24'. Show dimension for driveways and PAALs. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 10. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 11. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 12. Indicate drainage flow patterns. 13. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. Delineate Grading Limits. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17 14. Alley access is not allowed. Closed unused driveways. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 15. Indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Use a lighter pen weight, shading or hatching to indicate easement/abandonment area. 16. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 Future sidewalk area is ten feet wide with a six foot sidewalk. The space between curb and sidewalk is 2 feet. 17. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 18. Refuse container location is not accessible. Relocate or reposition container that is accessible. Demonstrate refuse vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned. Indicate a dimensioned refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2 19. Submit Civil Sheets to view details as per Notes 18, 19, 22 and 26. 20. Indicate curb return radii off of Stone Ave. into PAAL. Retention basin curb area and the west and south parking entryways may require an eighteen-foot radius curb return due to loading zones, fire and refuse vehicle maneuverability areas. D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.3.a Indicate and dimension loading zone, fire and refuse vehicle maneuverability area. 21. A five foot sidewalk along Plata Street will be located a minimum of two feet from the back of the existing curb. D.S. 3-01.3.3.B.1 22. Indicate the existing surrounding sidewalk widths. 23. Detail 1/C1.2 on Sheet C1.1graphically indicates a cross section of the wall and island area but this is not shown on Detail 1/C1.2 of Sheet C1.2. Indicate the island area on detail 1/C1.2 24. Indicate basin elevation depths and water surface elevations. 25. Indicate a dimensioned detail and cross section of basins. 26. Indicate and call out six-inch pipe from retention basin to street. Drainage Report 1. Indicate the Datum used to determine elevations. 2. Indicate cleanout location for catch-basin/storm drain infiltration trench pipe system. Indicate the responsible party for maintenance of this area. |
03/14/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border is an area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, as measured from the street property or MS&R lines running the full length of the property bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress per LUC 3.7.2.4. All street frontages along N. Stone, N. 9th, W. Lester, W. Plata for buildings and vehicle use areas require a landscape buffer, Include dimensions for borders from MS&R or street property lines. 2. Street landscape border shall be located entirely on site except that, if approved by the City Engineer per LUC 3.7.2.4. Revise keynote #32 on site plan to indicate a 10' landscape border 3. Indicate square footage and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage for all landscape areas per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 4. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: · Locations, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. · Material and areas of inert ground cover. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Designate treatment for landscaped areas. 5. Show on landscape plan existing and future sight visibility triangles DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.10 6. Walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border per 3.7.3.2.B.3. Move screen walls to the back of street buffers 7. Revise details on sheet C 1.4 to reflect changes made to landscape border width and screen wall locations per DS 2-07.2.2.D. 8. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Additional trees are required for vehicle use areas. 9. Minimum 25' height clearances for refuse storage collection site must be free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc) per DS 6-01.4.3.G. Relocate tree as necessary. |
03/16/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
04/05/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: ADG 2510 E. Grant Road #140 Tucson, AZ 85716 (520) 323-2227 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T05CM00872 Wildcat House Site Improvements 1801 N. Stone Avenue Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: April 6, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The subject property is made up of four lots, which must be combined into one. Provide lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. Add the property legal description to the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Bicycle parking shall be conveniently located to the main entrance of the building. Because bicycle parking is located behind the building away from the street frontage, directional signage must be used to show bicyclists where bike parking is located. Add the location of directional signage to the drawing. DS 2-09.5.1 3. Because Stone Avenue is a designated Major Street and Route, dimension the future MS&R ½ right-of-way width correctly on the plan along with the dimension from center line to future curb location. Note: based on the MS&R Plan, 6th Avenue has a future full right-of-way width of 100 feet. Revise site plan as necessary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21 4. Under the LUC Project Data, Along with the development designator, add to the site notes the restrictions which the proposed restaurant use is subject to. The stated use in the I-1 zone is subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.19.C. 5. Revise text size to be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") for microfilming and archiving purposes 6. Revise site plan to show and label clearly the future sight visibility triangles based on future curb location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 7. Provide recordation information (docket and page numbers) for all easements and right-of-way abandonments on the site plan. Indicate the width of all easements. Because of the darkness of the abandonment areas on the drawing it is difficult to read underlying text and dimensions. Revise by lightening these areas so that all text and line work is legible. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 8. If any new free-standing outdoor lighting or signage is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 & 25 9. Provide the maximum slope of the handicap ramp and aisle in the h/c parking detail. ANS/IBC 10. With a total of 203 parking spaces provided, 7 handicap spaces are required. Revise h/c parking calc and drawing to show that 7 h/c spaces are required and provided. IBC 11. Dimension the width of the pedestrian sidewalks clearly on the plan DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 12. Revise the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation stating the proposed FAR based on the GFA of the building divided by the total (new) lot size. Remove references to site coverage as there is no maximum allowed site coverage percentage for development designator 34. LUC 3.2.11 LUC 3.2.3.2.B 13. Dimension the width of the entrance drive and all PAAL's on the drawing. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
04/06/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
04/07/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |