Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T05CM00872
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Wildcat House Site Improvements T05CM00872 Site Plan (5th Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 5, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Due to the expiration of the permit, the requirements of the current Land Use Code and Development Standards will be enforced for this review. Some addition comments have been provided. 2. Provide the lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. Zoning acknowledges that this comment was not provided on the prior reviews but needs to be addressed. Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 the proposed pedestrian circulation the runs from the building to West Plata Street needs to also be an accessible route to an accessible entrance to the building. This route may not run out into the public right-of-way (ROW). Also along this same route there is a striped area at the west end of the parking that is just north of the building. This striped area is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the parking area access lane (PAAL). 4. For your information after discussions with Ron Brown, Structural Review, City of Tucson, Development Services Department in regards to the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 and the requirements for detectable warnings (truncated domes), it has been determined that some locations previously requiring truncated domes may no longer require them. The following comments are a direct result of these discussions. If you have any questions in regards to the requirements for truncated domes contact Ron Brown @837-4908. The truncated domes shown along the handicapped vehicle parking spaces, west side of the building are no longer required at this location. 5. Per COT DSD Administration this plan must be approved prior to July 3, 2008 or new review fees will be required. 6. Once the above comments are addressed I am willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t05cm00872-5th.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 06/06/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape border shall be located entirely on site except that, if approved by the City Engineer per LUC 3.7.2.4. Up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Provide approval documentation for use of ROW's 2. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. Provide future site and landscape plans to indicate how the site will function and meet code when ROW is taken. 3. Walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall LUC 3.7.3.2.3.C. Portions of the walls indicated on the landscape plan extend into border more than required the 10' border width is determined from the required screen to the property line. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/16/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Site Improvements TO: ADG LOCATION: 1801 N Stone Ave, T14S, R13E, Section 1, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM00872 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Revise SVT dimensions for SVT(s) along N. Stone Ave going north from W. Lester Street. 7. Within southeast corner of parcel there appears to be a line that may have been intended to be a sight visibility triangle. See plans and clarify and/or modify accordingly. 8. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Verify that all existing and future site visibility triangles (SVT) are labeled and dimensioned. 9. Label parking area access lanes P.A.A.L.(s) and include dimensions as shown on plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Complied 13. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) in plan view per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering area for the loading zone. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii and indicate appropriate radaii on site plan. 14. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Drainage patterns and finished grades appear to be located on the grading plan. Indicate on site plan - detail does not need to be as detailed as the grading plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Show general flow of drainage. 15. Complied 16. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Dimension the 10-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan. 17. Complied 18. Complied 19. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23 20. Complied 21. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. See the attached refuse detail for minimum requirements. Provide detail for trash enclosure to site plan. 22. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Label and show the maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view at the proposed refuse container location. 23. Complied 24. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 25. Provide a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Provide information on the site plan. 26. Complied 27. On hadicap sign T.C.C. 29-222 should read T.C.C. 20-222. 27. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |