Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05BU02323
Parcel: 13621004D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T05BU02323
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/03/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit stamped approved development plan including landscape plans to continue review.
10/21/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 10/21/05

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval.
11/04/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Tony Tsang, P.E. DATE: November 4, 2005
A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 E. Ft. Lowell Road, Ste. S.
Tucson, Arizona 85712
SUBJECT: Rincon Baptist Church, 7500 E. Golf Links Road
Grading Plan T05BU02323 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 29

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan and SWPPP

The Grading Plan (GP) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Grading Plan:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with 3 corrected copies of the GP.
2. The GP cannot be approved prior to the approval of the Development Plan.
3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
4. Add note: All Grading shall conform to City of Tucson D.S. 11-0.
5. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting"
6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the GP.
7. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed.
8. Show details of all surface materials.
9. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
10. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation).
11. Slopes of 3H: 1V require hand placed riprap.
12. Slopes of 2H: 1V or greater require grouted riprap.
13. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line.
14. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line).
15. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme.
16. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site.

Drainage report:
1. The DR has been accepted by engineering.

Stormwater pollution prevention plan:
1. The SWPPP has been accepted be engineering. Re-submit 2 copies of the SWPPP along with the re-submittal of the GP.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/7500 E. Golf Links Grad

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/08/2005 GBONILL1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/08/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed