Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU02176
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit stamped approved development plan including landscape plans to continue review. |
| 10/04/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Jeff Stanley, PE SUBJECT: Majestic Business Park (D05-0012) lots 2 and 3 Grading Plan Engineering Review LOCATION: T13S R13E Section 28 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU02176 SUMMARY: The Grading Plan, SWPPP package, and Drainage Report were received and reviewed by Engineering. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Grading Plan or SWPPP at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Grading Plan purposes only. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section 2-05.2.4.H.4: Provide approved copy of Development Plan. 2) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify the following elevation comments: a) Provide datum for basis of elevation on sheet 1. This datum should correspond to the drainage report datum. Discuss datums used in response letter. b) At north and south ends of channel area improvements, show existing grades and spot elevations to clarify that proposed spot elevations are matching existing grades. c) Label more existing contours lines on plan view sheet 2. 3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Address the following other grading plan comments: a) Provide two copies of the geotechnical report. b) Add geotechnical engineering information for General Note 8. c) For HC ramp area details (Handicapped Parking Detail on sheet 3), add notation that truncated domes are required on these areas. d) Remove or clarify intent of General Note 29. e) Proposed earthwork quantities appear high; check estimates. f) Add notation on sheet 1 for total disturbance area in square feet. g) Check redlines for location of illegible text and correct. h) Label phase areas on plan views per details shown on sheet 3. 4) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall meet the minimum requirements of the Construction General Permit. Revise the SWPPP to address all of the following comments. a) Clarify discrepancy between exhibit and SWPPP report. Control measures listed on page 7 and 11 of the report shall be shown on the exhibit or the exhibit controls shall match the report. b) Provide list of operators near front of report. c) Provide location map in report. d) Label and show on exhibit, the receiving waters. e) Provide discussion of what practices may be used for dust control practices for this site. f) Show stabilized entrances per page 7 (e) on the planview sheet. g) Revise and clarify both the activities record and stabilized sequence lists on pages 10 and 11. There should be a list of the sequence of events that begins with stabilization items, and proceeds to earthwork and grading activities, then ends with removal of control measures. h) Add a note to the plan sheet, and in first few pages of the report, stating that the operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours: i) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 i) Add a note to the cover of the grading plan and SWPP that a pre-construction meeting is required as well as SWPP inspection that includes some of the following information: Call for Pre-construction meeting. For a DSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html j) Show location for washout, EMP, and PSA areas on plan view. 5) See redlines for clarification or additional comments. Redlines are required for resubbmittal. 6) Add administrative address to grading plan, SWPP report and exhibit, and soils report. Submit a detailed response letter, redlines, three copies of the revised grading plan, and 4 copies of the revised SWPPP. Call me at 791-5550, extension 2204, to discuss comments if necessary. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 10/06/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 10/09/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |