Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01344
Review Name: REVISION - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T05BU0`1344 Riverwalk Development (residential component) As built Grading plans TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 2, 2013 DUE DATE: July 12, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the as-built grading plans but cannot approve them at this time. 2. A site inspection was made by PDSD staff which includes Engineering Inspector, Engineering and Zoning Plans Reviewers. As part of the site inspection, staff walked the site to ensure that all requests from previous as-built reviews and comments had been addressed. It has been noted that several issues are still pending that have not been addressed. Review the Engineering Plans Reviewer comments online for further information on results from the site inspection. At this time zoning cannot approve the as-built drawings until remaining issues are addressed and completed. |
| 07/12/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Riverwalk Grading Plan Revisions- 2nd Engineering Review TO: AF Sterling Homes LOCATION: 2404 E River Road; T13S R14E Sec20 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T05BU01344-R2 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (As-Built). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the revised grading plan at this time. The following items have been field verified during the last inspection with the Engineering Inspector, Engineering Reviewer and Zoning Reviewer and are inadequate to provide an ENG Inspection Final the following items need to be addressed prior to final grading plan approval and final inspection sign off: GRADING PLAN: 1) Provide wheel stops at all parking areas with stalls that are 20-feet in length and abut sidewalks that are not a minimum of 6.5 feet wide. Parking stalls must be designed and constructed so that the vehicles do not encroach over the required minimum 4-foot wide sidewalk for pedestrian access. 2) Provide the parking space striping for the required parking stalls located adjacent to and north of the existing mail boxes. Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan this area is required to have 14 parking spaces; however the spaces are not delineated on site. 3) Provide a revised grading plan that correctly shows location of all sidewalks on site. All portions that have been constructed needs to be shown on the plan set. It is acknowledged that some areas have been deleted or revised due to handicap accessibility requirements and existing grades in the field however elimination of sidewalks from in front of the buildings along the drives or other portions as shown on the Tentative Plat that were conditions of Rezoning will require new Rezoning conditions to be in compliance. 4) Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan there is a required pedestrian trail that goes through Common Area B adjacent to the south side of Units 126-135 that is not delineated onsite. The trail must be clearly defined for pedestrian use and must be delineated differently than the landscaping area. 5) Field visit verified multiple handicap access ramps onsite that exceed the maximum 8.3% slope required for ANSI conformance. Provide handicap access ramps that meet the maximum longitudal slope requirements for accessibility. 6) Provide hand railing at areas of the handicap accessibility ramps and sidewalk areas that have runs with a rise greater than 6-inches to comply with Section 505 of the ICC A117.1-2009. 7) Verify that all required handicap parking spaces have been installed and clearly marked on site. Per the "As-Builts" and a field visit there are multiple handicap spots that have been either moved or deleted from the site. Verify that the correct numbers of handicap spots per the parking calculations are provided. 8) Revise the plan set to verify handicap accessibility from River Road into the subdivision. The pedestrian sidewalk along the east portion of the site has a portion of the access gate encroaching into the sidewalk and does not allow for the minimum 3-foot width per ANSI or the 4-foot width per the Development Standards. Also the pedestrian access on the west side has a ramp that terminates at the access driveway with no connection to the other side or down along the entire west side adjacent to the mail boxes. The pedestrian access must either continue along the same side of the roadway and in front of the mail boxes meeting slope requirements with landings and hand railing if applicable or it must continue to the other side of the road with a clear pedestrian cross walk and curb cuts with ramps into the median and landscape area to get the accessibility to the other side of the access road. 9) Verify that all handicap spots meet the maximum slope requirements of 2% in all directions. Field verification showed some of the handicap spots exceeding the 2% maximum slope requirements. 10) Field visit verified multiple light poles that have not been fully constructed. The pole base and wiring has been installed however the poles and lights have not been installed. These poles must be installed to meet the light requirements for the site. 11) Provide the hand railing along the pedestrian access path adjacent to the 3-cell scuppers located in the far southwest corner of the site. It appears that the sidewalk included the pipe set into the concrete for providing removable railing, but the railing was not installed onsite. 12) Revise the railing provided at the access location for the concrete lined channel to be removable. Per the Tentative Plat Keynote 6 and 7 this area is a maintenance access ramp and must provide vehicular access into the channel. The existing hand railing seems to be permanent and can not be removed. Also revise the ramp to meet the minimum slope requirements for access. It appears that a large piece of wood has been placed along the top portion of the ramp due to a large vertical drop off so vehicles can drive into the ramp, however this does not meet the minimum 15% slope requirement and it appears that this is causing damage to the concrete along the top portion of the ramp. 13) Field verification showed that there are numerous areas of the site where brick pavers are used that need to be fixed due to settling of the subsoil or uplifting of the pavers. The pedestrian access areas that are constructed out of the brick pavers must provide a uniform surface for accessibility. 14) Verify on the revised grading plans or a revised landscape plans that all landscaping requirements per the last approved Landscape Plan have been addressed. It appeared from the field visit areas of landscaping were either incomplete or the landscaping had died out. 15) A complete set of revised grading plans ("As-built") are required that include but are not limited to what is shown on the approved construction/grading plans and what is listed above. All changes must be clearly documented on the revised grading plan sheets and must be accompanied by an Engineering Certification letter per PDSD Policy 2008-04 dated 09APR09. GENERAL COMMENTS: A meeting is requested with the contractor and developer to discuss this project with the Zoning Division, Engineering Division and Engineering Inspector to help expedite the resubmittal of the revised grading plans. It is preferred that the meeting take place onsite so that the concerns documented above can be talked about and clearly understood. I can be reached at 837-4929 to schedule a meeting. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/15/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval. Fianal landscap inspection must be complete. Provide monitoring report as to the disposition of protected native plants. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |