Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU01300
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Loren Makus, SWPPP Review 8-8-05 The following comments were provided previously but were not adequately addressed. Please provide a letter with the revised SWPPP that describes how each comment has been addressed and the location within the SWPPP where the corrections have been made. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting with me I can be contacted at 791-5550 ext. 1161 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. 1. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. It appears that the project drains to a tributary to Robb Wash. This should be identified as a receiving water and should be shown on the general location map. 2. Part IV.D.5.a.i The SWPPP identifies the retention basin as the sediment basin for the construction project. However, the basin appears to be upstream of most of the project site. Explain how it will be used for removing sediment. The general permit requires that when a project has at least 10 acres of disturbed soil that a sediment basin be provided. The size of the basin is determined by the formula in the general permit or must be at least 3600 cubic feet per drained acre. The analysis and sediment basin capacity is separate and unrelated to the City of Tucson retention requirements. Provide the analysis and required sediment basin design. 3. Provide a general discussion and specific plans and details for retaining sediment and controlling run-off through channel along the south boundary. Explain the timing for installation of erosion controls and velocity dissipation structures for this area. |
| 08/04/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/08/2005 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace Grading Plan Comments: 1- The spillway south of Building 3 still encroaches on the trash enclosure. Relocate the spillway and provide its spot elevations. 2- For future reference, include on each sheet only the keynotes that apply. This will reduce confusion and will help the reviewer expedite the review process by not trying to find the keynotes information that is not shown on every sheet. 3- Call out the required setbacks from the retention basins and any required slope protection based the soils report recommendations. Please be advised that the setbacks from the basins are different from the setbacks from slopes. 4- Submit a copy of the Soils Report. 5- Provide maintenance access ramps for the smaller retention basins. Demonstrate that the ramp will not allow inadvertent vehicular access. 6- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1195 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov Loren Makus, SWPPP Review 8-8-05 The following comments were provided previously but were not adequately addressed. Please provide a letter with the revised SWPPP that describes how each comment has been addressed and the location within the SWPPP where the corrections have been made. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting with me I can be contacted at 791-5550 ext. 1161 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. 1. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. It appears that the project drains to a tributary to Robb Wash. This should be identified as a receiving water and should be shown on the general location map. 2. Part IV.D.5.a.i The SWPPP identifies the retention basin as the sediment basin for the construction project. However, the basin appears to be upstream of most of the project site. Explain how it will be used for removing sediment. The general permit requires that when a project has at least 10 acres of disturbed soil that a sediment basin be provided. The size of the basin is determined by the formula in the general permit or must be at least 3600 cubic feet per drained acre. The analysis and sediment basin capacity is separate and unrelated to the City of Tucson retention requirements. Provide the analysis and required sediment basin design. 3. Provide a general discussion and specific plans and details for retaining sediment and controlling run-off through channel along the south boundary. Explain the timing for installation of erosion controls and velocity dissipation structures for this area. |
| 08/08/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit approved development plan including landscape and NPP plans to continue review. |
| 08/23/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/17/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/31/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |