Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU00460
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Grading Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Reflect site plan revisions onto grading plan. 3. Indicate contour intervals along with the north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 4. Indicate project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 5. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E Indicate a dimensioned detail for downspout and sidewalk scupper. 6. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles for all street intersections and driveways to streets. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 See Sheet C1.1 for redline SVT locations. D.S.3-01.5.2 & 3 7. Indicate a dimensioned basin/wall detail and include Architectural Detail Sheet. 8. Delineate Grading Limits. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17 9. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 10. Indicate basin water surface elevations. 11. Indicate a dimensioned detail and cross section of basins. 12. Keynote #23 calls out wall openings. Indicate a dimensioned wall/wall opening detail. 13. Security barriers must be provided at the top of a basin where water depths exceed two feet. A minimum 42-inch barrier height is required for all basins. Railings must be provided, as required by the Uniform Building Code, for retaining walls on any inlet and outlet structure headwalls and wingwalls. SDRM 3.6.2 14. Detail 3/C1.4-Catch Basin, will these be considered as cleanouts as well? Indicate graphically where the cleanout is to be located for the 24 inch perforated pipe. 15. Detail A/C1.4-Retention Pond Cross Section, indicate proposed grades/elevations. |
| 03/14/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 03/19/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/19/05 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |