Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T05BU00460
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Wildcat House Site Improvements T05BU00460 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 19, 2007 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu00460.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/23/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 23, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU00460 PROJECT NAME: Wildcat House Parking Lot PROJECT ADDRESS: 1801 North Stone Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Provide the grading plan activity number on each sheet in the lower right hand corner. 4. The grading plan submitted has a seal with a date in 2005. It is not clear to this office why a retention basin has been provided. The entire site is impervious. The site is not in a balanced or critical basin therefore detention is not required. If the hydraulic structures provided on the grading are going to be provided for site improvements, a drainage report must be submitted providing the supporting calculations and discussion for the hydrology proposal. In the response letter provide a detailed explanation on the history of the proposal and if the retention basin and the hydraulic structures remain; provide the drainage report. 5. Security barriers must be provided at the top of a basin where water depths exceed two feet. A minimum 42-inch barrier height is required for all basins. Railings must be provided, as required by the Uniform Building Code, for retaining walls on any inlet and outlet structure headwalls and wingwalls. SDRM 3.6.2 This comment is from the first review. Provide security barriers on both sides of the basin. 6. Provide sight visibility triangles in the required locations. 7. Show roof drainage (flow arrows). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 8. Show more finish grades on the plan. Drainage patterns must be readily definable in all areas. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 9. Add a general note; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 10. Curb access ramps need to be consistent with Standard Detail No. 207, using truncated domes in place of tactile grooves. 11. Provide the docket and Page for the new ingress/egress easement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 12. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. |
| 07/30/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/26/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |