Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T04CM04415
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T04CM04415 2627 E. Benson Hy, Francisco's Honest Concrete Commercial Site Plan, 3rd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please label the adjacent site to the east, parcel 140-11-006B, is not part of this project. Furthermore, remove the vehicle area notes from this lot. 2. Proposed building height shall be measured from design grade. Revise all building heights noted on the site plan as required. Add the height above design grade to the elevation drawings. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) RESPONSE: Indicates a building height of 16'4" on the site plan, yet 14'8" in the response letter. In addition, the building elevation shows that the building height is measured as 16'4" from finished floor. Building height must be measured from design grade to the top of the wall. Clarify and revise. 3. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the accessible parking space, access aisle, and accessible ramp. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003) RESPONSE: Call out handicapped ramps please. How is handicapped access accomplished from access aisle to building? Where does the ramp start? Does the ramp begin flush to the access aisle? Clarify with notes please. 4. All vehicular use area must be paved. If a portion of the site is to be left undeveloped, as it would appear to be in the rear portion of the site, a barrier (i.e curb, post bollards, fencing) is required to prevent vehicles from encroaching onto undeveloped areas. Revise to show curbing along edge of PAAL. (LUC 3.3.7.3) RESPONSE: letter of response indicates curbing to be provided along PAAL to prevent vehicle crossing onto undeveloped areas of the site. Show curbing and add note to plan. 5. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for Class 2 bicycle parking facility. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria (surfacing, location, dimensions etc.). (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) RESPONSE: Staff acknowledges the bicycle parking provided. Please provide signage on the site directing bicyclists to bike parking location, as it is not visible from site entry. 6. An accessible sidewalk at least four (4) feet wide is required from the building entrance to the rights-of-way. (D.S. 2-08.4.1.A) RESPONSE: Staff acknowledges the sidewalk provided TO the right of way. Be advised, staff has been instructed a sidewalk from the site connecting sidewalk area in the right of way may be required. See Engineering comments. 7. If applicable, provide the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) RESPONSE: indicates that outdoor lighting is to be provided. No notes for free-standing outdoor lighting were readily found. Please clarify. 8. PER THIS REVIEW: With regards to the handicapped parking signage, increase the post height for the sign to 7', measured from grade to the bottom of the sign. Provide note that fine is $518.00 for illegal parking. 9: PER THIS REVIEW: Staff noted type face for detail drawings labels needs to be increased in size to allow for microfilming. 10. Depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156 if you have any questions on this review. HT C:\planning\site plan\T04CM04415 2627 e benson hy 3rd.doc |
| 10/18/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
| 10/30/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street per 3.7.3.2. Move 6' screen to the back of the landscape border. 2. Revise landscape border calculation street names. (Park Ave and Alvord are indicated). 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans per DS 2-07.2.1.C. Show "concrete slab" on the landscape plan indicated on the site plan and grading plans. Indicate area used for basin. 4. Revise note pertaining to water harvesting to read: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE DEPRESSED A MAXIMUM OF 6' TO ACCOMODATE WATER HARVESTING 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/04/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Out for 3rd Party review |
| 12/04/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 6, 2006 SUBJECT: 2627 E Benson Hwy- Engineering Review of site plan and grading plan TO: Francisco H. Maldonado LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec05, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T04CM04415 (site plan) and T06BU00512 (grading plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T04CM04415), grading plan (T06BU00512), drainage report (prepared by JE Fuller Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc.), and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.20: Provide on the site plan all easements for the existing and proposed utilities. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. If easements are to be provided by owner they must still be shown on the site plan for verification of location and obstructions. 2) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Benson Highway. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Since there is no existing curb or sidewalk located on Benson Highway it will be installed with this project. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide a detail on the site plan and grading plan to show that the handicap access ramps at all pedestrian circulation locations have truncated domes per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide on the grading plan flow arrows for roof drainage and concentration points for all down spouts and concentration of flows at sidewalk locations around the building. Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension all scuppers that are used for collecting roof drainage and discharges at the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 5) Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 6) CGP Part IV.C.3.b: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit all areas of soil disturbance. Clarify areas that will not be disturbed or used for stockpiling. 7) CGP Part IV.C.3.e: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit the location of off-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage. Or provide a narrative in the report stating if off-site storage areas are being used. 8) CGP Part IV.C.3.f: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the locations of all surface waters, if applicable. 9) CGP Part IV.C.3.g: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the locations where storm water is discharged to surface water, if applicable. 10) CGP Part IV.C.4: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams or arroyos. 11) CGP Part IV.C.5: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit the location of the concrete, paint and truck wash out area. The wash out area can not be located within any proposed basin or water harvesting area. 12) CGP Part IV.D.2.b: Revise page 3 of the report to call out the proper Appendix where the best management practice's specification can be located. The reference is for Appendix E, however the specifications are located in Appendix D. 13) CGP Part IV.D.4: Revise the heading paragraph on page 6 for the stabilization efforts to read "Part IV.D.4". 14) CGP Part IV.D.7: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit or within the text of the report all allowable sources of non-stormwater discharges. Describe how all non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced and how BMPs will be implemented for non-stormwater discharges. 15) CGP Part IV.D.8.a: Describe measures to be used to prevent discharges of solid material to water of the U.S. 16) CGP Part IV.D.8.c: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit to relocate the chemical and material storage area outside of the proposed basin and the calculated 100-year floodplain. Storage areas can not be located within a basin or the 100-year floodplain limits. 17) CGP Part IV.F: Provide a signed copy of the Notice of Intent within the report. The NOI must be filled out and signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. Revise the Appendix references for both the NOI and the NOT on page 8. 18) CGP Part IV.H.4: Revise the SWPPP report under the Inspection heading to include the following: a) Describe all areas to be inspected including all distrurbed areas of the site and areas used to store materials exposed to precipitation b) Describe inspection procedures and how inspectors will look for evidence of, or potential for, pollutants entering any drainage system. c) Describe in inspection procedures how inspectors will observe sedimentation and erosion control measures at accessible discharge points, and ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective. 19) CGP Part IV.H.6: Describe in the report where the inspection records will be maintained for the required 3 years. 20) CGP Part IV.H.7: Describe in the report how the SWPPP will be modified when needed, within 7 calendar days of inspection. 21) CGP Part IV.I.1: Describe in the report how the SWPPP will be modified within 15 business days after change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at site that has a significant effect on discharge or that was not previously addressed in the report. 22) CGP Part IV.J.1: Provide the signature for the operator on the SWPPP. 23) CGP Part IV.J.2: Describe where a copy of the SWPPP will be retained on site. 24) CGP Part IV.J.2: Describe how and where the operator will post a sign at the main entrance to the site containing: AZPDES authorization number, construction site contact name and telephone number, brief description, location of SWPPP. See the enclosed, green AZPDES Posting Requirements form enclosed in the package. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan and a revised SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/29/2006 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/29/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |