Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM04415
Parcel: 14011007A

Address:
2627 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T04CM04415
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/18/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied See zoning review comments for site plan.

Height differences must be clarified throughout the plans.
10/25/2006 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson, for business occupancy.
2. Revise Plumbing General Note #8 so that it is legible. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
3. Revise the fixture descriptions for the plumbing fixtures to include only those fixtures that are part of this project and coordinate the fixture names with the plumbing plans and the fixture connection schedule. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference Section 804.3, IECC 2000.
5. Clarify the water isometric. The diagram shows two cold water pipes and a hot water pipe going to the water closet. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
6. Include the size of the building water supply pipe on the site plan. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
7. Clarify the equipment data for the water heater. The specified model has a 50-gallon storage capacity but the specifications call for a 30-gallon storage capacity. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
8. Show how the location of the water heater is able to provide vertical clearance for handicapped access to the shower. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
10/26/2006 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not addressed. Demonstrate energy code compliance using calculations based on the current code for commercial buildings. Reference Section 101.3, International Energy Conservation Code 2000.
2. Comment not addressed. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference Section 803.2.1, IECC 2000.
3. Comment not addressed. Revise the font size used on all of the drawings to a minimum of 1/8", all upper case. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
4. Comment not addressed. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top unit. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000.
5. The heat pump schedule specifies an optional UV air filter for this project. Show on the drawing where the filter is to be located. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
6. Coordinate the mechanical plan and total airflow specified in the heat pump schedule. The schedule calls for a 6-ton heat pump (variously referred to as HP-1, HP-2, and AC-1) with a total airflow of 2400-CFM but the mechanical plan shows only 850 CFM from the same unit. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
7. Correct the provided ventilation calculations per Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2000. Coordinate the required amount of outside air from the calculations with the outside air flow specified in the heat pump schedule.
8. Coordinate the mechanical plan and detail 4/M1. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
11/01/2006 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Minimum font size is 1/8". Enlarge as necessary. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. UNRESPONSIVE.
2. Insufficient darkness of print for notes underlying Luminaire Schedule.
3. Note that receptacle outlets shall be counted at a minimum of 180VA per outlet. Reference NEC 220.3 (B) (9). Re-calculate Ckts 11, 13, 15, and 12.
4. Will review panel schedule after this has been enlarged, and after the necessary corrections have been made. See Comment #1 above, and the clarifications required elsewhere.
5. Riser Diagram refers to NEC 250-81. There is no NEC 250-81.
6. Lighting Power Budget shall comply with 2000 IECC. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. Clarify what Building or area type is being referenced. The use of 1.9 W/SF is allowable only for grocery stores, retail sales, and wholesale showrooms, and with over half of the building taken up by Storage, it does not appear to fit into any of the above categories.
7. Provide lighting fixture cut sheets. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. UNRESPONSIVE.
8. Demonstrate that exterior lighting fixtures are in compliance with 2000 IECC. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. UNRESPONSIVE.
9. Demonstrate that exterior lighting fixtures are in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. Supply proof in the form of a fixture cut sheet that this 100W max. fixture will not exceed 1710 mean lumens.
10. Evaporative Cooler is powered by a receptacle on Ckt A-8. Demonstrate that this equipment is cord-connected.
11. Evaporative Cooler, at 3047 VA according to the panel schedule, would draw over 25A. The 20A circuit is inadequate.
12. Clarify nomenclature and quantity for the heat pump(s) on this project, and coordinate with Mechanical. It appears that HP is to be installed, referred to as Heat Pump on the panel schedule, HP-1 on the Electrical Plan, HP-2 on the Mechanical Schedule, and HP-1 on the Mechanical Plan.
13. HP-1, listed at 27.7A on the Electrical Plan, would be 3324 VA per phase.
14. 5 KW Heat Strip, on Panel Schedule, only is counted at a total of 2.1 KW. Please clarify.
15. 5 KW Heat Strip is not documented on the Mechanical Plans. Please clarify.
16. Since the 5 KW Heat Strip is on its own circuit, it should have a Code-required disconnecting means.
17. It is unclear whether the intent is to provide the Air Purifier Unit. Clarify, and address electrical power as necessary.
18. 6 KW Water Heater, on Ckt A-7,9, is only counted at 3.4 KW on the panel schedule.
19. Specify the feeder size to the new panel.
20. Specify the overcurrent protection for the new panel.
21. Specify the overcurrent protection for the new panel's feeder.
22. Provide maintenance receptacle for all HVAC equipment. Reference NEC 210.63. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. UNRESPONSIVE.
23. Office and Conference Room shall have bi-level switching per IECC 805.2.1.1. REFER TO FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS. UNRESPONSIVE.
11/16/2006 SEPTIC APPROVAL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/04/2006 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Out for 3rd Party Review
12/04/2006 LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied
12/04/2006 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 6, 2006
SUBJECT: 2627 E Benson Hwy- Engineering Review of site plan and grading plan
TO: Francisco H. Maldonado
LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec05, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T04CM04415 (site plan) and T06BU00512 (grading plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T04CM04415), grading plan (T06BU00512), drainage report (prepared by JE Fuller Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc.), and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.20: Provide on the site plan all easements for the existing and proposed utilities. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. If easements are to be provided by owner they must still be shown on the site plan for verification of location and obstructions.

2) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Benson Highway. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Since there is no existing curb or sidewalk located on Benson Highway it will be installed with this project.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide a detail on the site plan and grading plan to show that the handicap access ramps at all pedestrian circulation locations have truncated domes per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13.


GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide on the grading plan flow arrows for roof drainage and concentration points for all down spouts and concentration of flows at sidewalk locations around the building. Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension all scuppers that are used for collecting roof drainage and discharges at the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.

5) Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

6) CGP Part IV.C.3.b: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit all areas of soil disturbance. Clarify areas that will not be disturbed or used for stockpiling.

7) CGP Part IV.C.3.e: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit the location of off-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage. Or provide a narrative in the report stating if off-site storage areas are being used.

8) CGP Part IV.C.3.f: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the locations of all surface waters, if applicable.

9) CGP Part IV.C.3.g: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the locations where storm water is discharged to surface water, if applicable.

10) CGP Part IV.C.4: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams or arroyos.

11) CGP Part IV.C.5: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit the location of the concrete, paint and truck wash out area. The wash out area can not be located within any proposed basin or water harvesting area.

12) CGP Part IV.D.2.b: Revise page 3 of the report to call out the proper Appendix where the best management practice's specification can be located. The reference is for Appendix E, however the specifications are located in Appendix D.

13) CGP Part IV.D.4: Revise the heading paragraph on page 6 for the stabilization efforts to read "Part IV.D.4".

14) CGP Part IV.D.7: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit or within the text of the report all allowable sources of non-stormwater discharges. Describe how all non-stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced and how BMPs will be implemented for non-stormwater discharges.

15) CGP Part IV.D.8.a: Describe measures to be used to prevent discharges of solid material to water of the U.S.

16) CGP Part IV.D.8.c: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit to relocate the chemical and material storage area outside of the proposed basin and the calculated 100-year floodplain. Storage areas can not be located within a basin or the 100-year floodplain limits.

17) CGP Part IV.F: Provide a signed copy of the Notice of Intent within the report. The NOI must be filled out and signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. Revise the Appendix references for both the NOI and the NOT on page 8.

18) CGP Part IV.H.4: Revise the SWPPP report under the Inspection heading to include the following:
a) Describe all areas to be inspected including all distrurbed areas of the site and areas used to store materials exposed to precipitation
b) Describe inspection procedures and how inspectors will look for evidence of, or potential for, pollutants entering any drainage system.
c) Describe in inspection procedures how inspectors will observe sedimentation and erosion control measures at accessible discharge points, and ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective.

19) CGP Part IV.H.6: Describe in the report where the inspection records will be maintained for the required 3 years.

20) CGP Part IV.H.7: Describe in the report how the SWPPP will be modified when needed, within 7 calendar days of inspection.

21) CGP Part IV.I.1: Describe in the report how the SWPPP will be modified within 15 business days after change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at site that has a significant effect on discharge or that was not previously addressed in the report.

22) CGP Part IV.J.1: Provide the signature for the operator on the SWPPP.

23) CGP Part IV.J.2: Describe where a copy of the SWPPP will be retained on site.

24) CGP Part IV.J.2: Describe how and where the operator will post a sign at the main entrance to the site containing: AZPDES authorization number, construction site contact name and telephone number, brief description, location of SWPPP. See the enclosed, green AZPDES Posting Requirements form enclosed in the package.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan and a revised SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference.

If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/29/2006 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/29/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed