Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03825
Parcel: 129130040

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T04CM03825
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/30/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/30/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the trees included in the application for exception. Photographs of the site are necessary for approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
08/30/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A street landscape border, per LUC 3.7.2.4 is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Portions of the street landscape border measure 5'.

2. Dalea greggii is considered a ground cover and typically not available in 5 gal. size. Dalea frutescens would be an acceptable substation per LUC 3.7.2.4

3. Revise square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g increased number of plants is required.


4. Keynote #7 according to the table is a single trunk planting, #7 is also indicating the vehicle use area revise the landscape plan keynote as necessary.

5. All areas not otherwise improved shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7 include treatment for area indicated in keynote #14.

6. The access route to the loading space shall have an overhead clearance of fifteen (15) feet per LUC 3.4.4.2.A.D include the height clearance in Keynote #8

7. Show the location of refuse storage per DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.32

8. A 6' screen for refuse storage is required for adjacent properties LUC Table 3.7.2-I

9. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the plants indicated in application for exception. Photographs of the site are necessary for approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C
09/14/2004 Peter McLaughlin ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Eduardo J. Ornelas FROM:
100 N. Stone Avenue #1002
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 624-0070

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner
Development Services Dept.

PROJECT:
T03CM03825
Victor's Appliances
926 E. Silverlake Road
Site Plan Review (1st review)

TRANSMITTAL: September 15, 2004

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed as a new of use. Full code compliance is required.
DS 2-02

2. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, the one handicapped parking space provided must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Please revise detail by removing the reference to a 5' wide aisle for a car. Provide the maximum slope of the handicap access aisle and associated ramp to be provided.
ANS/ IBC

3. Indicate what the yard area to the west of the building is to be used for. If outdoor storage or display of appliances is proposed the proposed area to be used for appliance display, sales and service must be defined and dimensioned on the drawing. If applicable, revise vehicle parking calculations to any outdoor display or storage area.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4

4. Remove the use of "retail" if the use is solely wholesale as indicated by the parking calculation of 1 space per 2,000 SF.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

5. Revise legal description in location map to be correct. According to the Assessors Office the subject property is made up of both lots 3 and 4 of Block 1 in Grandview Addition. Revise all legal descriptions accordingly. Since this site is made up of 2 lots these lots must be combined with an Assessors tax combo form and a recorded covenant which can be obtained from the zoning review counter. Please provide documentation of lot combination.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2
DS 2-02.2.1.A.6

6. Based on the proposed wholesaling use, bicycle parking is required at 8 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided, 90 % class 1, 10 % class 2. However, for uses providing fewer than 50 vehicle parking spaces class 2 bicycle parking may be used. A minimum of two class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. Please revise bicycle parking calc to indicate two spaces required and provided. Because proposed bicycle parking is located inside the building, directional signage must be provided indicating the location of class 2 bicycle parking per DS 2-09.5.1. Show the location of the directional signage on the site plan. Also, include a floor plan of the warehouse building showing how the bicycle parking will be placed to allow all required dimensions and maneuverability area.
LUC 3.3.3.5
LUC 3.3.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.9
DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
DS 2-09.5.1

7. Show the location, dimensions and purpose of any existing easements on the drawing and provide recordation.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

8. Label existing and future curbs on the plan and dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing and future curbs.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19

9. Revise all required and provided setbacks to be correct under the zoning information table. Revise the required street front building setback to read "the greater of 21 feet or the height of exterior structure wall". Revise provided street front bldg. setback to correctly reflect the dimensions on the drawing. The required bldg setback to adjacent R-2 zoned property to the south is 1-½ times the height of bldg wall. Based on the 13 foot building height proposed, a 19½- foot bldg. setback is required. Revise drawing to demonstrate compliance. In the setback table revise the side perimeter yard bldg. setback provided to read 1 foot to the east perimeter lot line and 59 feet to the west perimeter lot line as shown on the drawing.
LUC 3.2.6.5
LUC 3.2.6.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

10. Dimensioned the pedestrian connection to Silverlake Road on the plan. DS 2-08.4.1
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

11. Add a proposed Floor Area Ratio to the plan. A 2,400 sq. ft. floor area ¸ 13,000 sq. ft. lot area = 0.18 FAR DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

12. Place a note on the plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, MS&R setback zone. LUC 2.8.3

13. Show the location, size and height of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-02.2.1.13

14. Indicate the location of any proposed freestanding lighting on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
09/15/2004 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied See zoning comments.
09/21/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 22, 2004
TO: Eduardo J. Ornelas
SUBJECT: Site Plan: Victor's Appliances
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM03825

SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on September 22, 2004. It was not approved. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:

1. Clarify the street dimensions. Clearly indicate which dimension is for the existing and which is for the ultimate Right-of-Way width. Clarify whether the shown property line is the existing line or the future property line. Check with Tucson Department of Transportation, Maps and Records to determine the mid-block MS&R Right-of-Way width and to determine whether this parcel will be affected by future intersection widening, per the MS&R plan. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19)
2. Show the locations of driveways within 300 feet of the proposed driveway location. The Transportation Access Management Guidelines limit driveways on a Collector to no more than two within 300 feet and requires at least 80 feet between adjacent driveways.
3. Show drainage patterns, including roof drainage and finish grades. Show that sidewalks will be kept flood-free for up to a 10-year event. Show how that water harvesting will be maximized to the extent practicable. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16)
4. Show the location for the refuse container(s) that will be provided. Show and dimension access for the vehicles that will service the containers. ((DS 2-02.2.1.A.32)
5. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.17)
6. Provide bearings for each lot line. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.15)
Revise the Site Plan, to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of each for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed.
Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/23/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/23/2004 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed