Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03185
Parcel: 122173100

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T04CM03185
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/09/2004 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal.

2. Indicate Cut and Fill quantities on Site Plan.

3. Submit a copy of the approval letter from Sam Chandler of Environmental Services pertaining to the refuse collection area.
11/10/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. An approved turnaround is required for dead-end fire access roadways.
2. Fire lane signs required.
3. Fire hydrant required.
( If fire sprinklers are to be substituted for the above requirements, please indicate so with a note on the site plan and provide fire sprinkler design criteria on the building plans.)
11/26/2004 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied This comment has not been addressed from the previous submittal: Tree identified as #7 in the NPP application for exception appears to be a native mesquite. Include on landscape plan if the tree is to be preserved in place or removed from site. Mitigation of removed vegetation will apply per LUC Table 3.8.6-I.
11/26/2004 Andrew Connor LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Under no circumstances can refuse storage be located within the street landscape border per Zoning Administration.

2. This comment has not been addressed from the previous submittal: Tree identified as #7 in the NPP application for exception appears to be a native mesquite. Include on landscape plan if the tree is to be preserved in place or removed from site. Mitigation of removed vegetation will apply per LUC Table 3.8.6-I.
11/29/2004 Daniel Castro ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were
addressed. (CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD)

1. Elevation drawings provided indicate a 21 foot height to the top of the parapet wall. The building setbacks required for the north and east lot lines are to be based on the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height of the exterior building wall. Building height is to be measured from design grade. If design grade is eight (8) inches below finished floor elevation, the building wall height measured to the top of parapet wall is 21'8". Revise the required building setbacks noted on sheet one (1) to be based from design grade to top of parapet wall.

2. LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 perimeter yard "CC" requires a minimum building setback of 16.25 feet from both the east and north property lines. The site plan proposes a 6.5' setback from the east property line and a 13.5 foot setback from the north property line. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7)

3. If LDO or variance is applied for and approved, add a general note which states the following: case number, date of approval, setback modification or variances granted, and any conditions imposed. In addition, provide a copy of the LDO or variance decision letter with the next submittal.

4. This plan may be reviewed at the counter for Zoning Review. Contact me at the number below to set an appointment.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/07/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/07/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed