Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM03185
Parcel: 122173100

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T04CM03185
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/26/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. An approved fire apparatus turnaround is required for dead-end fire access roadways.
2. Fire lane signs required.
3. fire hydrant required.
10/27/2004 JIM TATE ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included in the submittal.
11/05/2004 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The total flow for the private sewage collection system for this project is in excess of 3000 gallons per day. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13).
2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference Section 610.4, UPC 1994.
3. City of Tucson Ordinance 1802 requires a reduced pressure backflow preventer to be located immediately after the water meter. Please show the RPBP on the drawings and include the pressure drop on the water calculations or provide documentation from Tucson Water indicating that this project is exempt from this requirement.
4. Specify the material to be used for the gas piping. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
5. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 fps for Copper piping. Reference Section A 6.1, UPC 1994; IAPMO IS 3-93, Section 610.0.
6. Include the dishwasher in the water demand calculations. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994.
7. Show how the piping and ducts in the firewalls comply with Section 712, IBC 2003.
8. The note on sheet 7 indicates that the gas piping is to "comply with UPC sec 1218 - medium pressure gas piping" but the design is for low-pressure gas piping. Correct the note or provide a complete design for the gas distribution system.
9. Correct the natural gas calculations on sheet 7; the heating value for natural gas in this area is not 1100 BTUH/cubic foot. Reference Section 1216.3, UPC 1994.
10. Correct the waste and vent isometric to comply with Section 703.2, UPC 1994. Show the sizes of all of the pipe sections in the isometric.
11. Clarify the reason for the flues shown for the electric water heaters.
11/05/2004 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Lettering fades out on panel Note 2 and top notes on Electrical Sheet. Please re-plot.
2. Top notes refer to Chapter 37 for wiring and methods. Clarify Chapter 37 of which Standard?
3. Top notes refer to REF 907.2.10. Of what Standard?
4. Per Comment #2 in the Mechanical Review, clarify the reference to "Heat Pump".
5. Specify the wattages and voltages of all interior and exterior lighting fixtures.
6. Submit cut sheets for exterior lighting fixtures.
7. Circuit 16 shall not supply any other outlets besides the bathroom receptacle branch circuit. Reference NEC 210-11 (c) (3).
8. Island receptacles shall be GFCI protected. NEC 210-8 (a) (7).
9. Put EF-2 on electrical plans, and identify a branch circuit.
10. Top notes call for compliance with NEC 220-32. This Code section may not be used because the both cooking equipment and heating are not electrical.
11. It appears that load calculations were performed per NEC 220-30. Water heater shall be counted at 100%.
12. Add exhaust fans and garbage disposal to load calculations.
13. Clarify exactly what kind of HVAC equipment is intended for installation, and compute load calculation per NEC 220-30 (c).
14. Identify a circuit for the maintenance receptacle for the HVAC equipment.
15. Load calculation concludes "Use 200A service." The 3/0, of ampacity 200A total, will not accommodate (4) (68.48) = 273.92A for the four units.
16. Show location of Panel A.
17. Clarify type of equipment situated below the meters on the Electric Riser Diagram. Is a disconnect, or the entire panel?
18. Clarify whether Panel A has a Main CB, or is MLO.
19. Equipment referenced above in Comment 17 has lines connecting them, 3 total. Clarify intent.
20. Equipment referenced above in Comment 17 is described as "20/240V". Do you mean "120/240V"?
21. Size the feeders to panel A.
22. Electrical Riser Diagram indicates overhead service. Sheet 16 calls for underground service. Please clarify, and note that only if existing services are overhead is it permissible to install these services overhead.
23. Identify your grounding electrodes.
24. Note at bottom of Riser Diagram states: "ALL ELEC EQUIP MUST BE RATED < AFC." Equipment shall be rated greater than, not smaller than AFC.
25. Specify equipment grounding and bonding. Reference NEC Article 250.
26. Grounding note on Riser Diagram references NEC 250-81 and 250-83. No such Code Sections in the 1999 NEC. Pls clarify intent.
11/05/2004 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/05/2004 Robert Sherry MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The current energy code is the 2000 International Energy Conservation Code. Provide information to show how the building was determined to be in compliance with the code (i.e. what table was used in chapter 5).
2. The "heat pump" called out on sheets 7, 8, and 9 is not a heat pump. Please correct the labels.
3. The minimum size for a condensate drain is ¾". Reference Section 307.2.2, IMC 2000.
4. Indicate the termination point of the condensate drain on the drawing.
5. Show how the specified round sheet metal duct with 1" of insulation can fit into the available space above the furred area on the first floor.
6. Provide a detail showing how the penetration of the rated floor by the HVAC duct complies with Section 711.7, IBC 2003.
11/23/2004 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
11/29/2004 Daniel Castro ZONING REVIEW Denied structural plan may not be approved until the site plan has been approved by all sections.
12/03/2004 Raul Palma BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied City of Tucson, Development Services
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS

1) Specify on sheet 6 of plans (floor framing) ¾" plywood or OSB w/ 8d @ 6" o.c.
@ edges, & 8d @ 10"o.c. in field.
2) Show sheet 5 on floor load tabulation 3.5psf at flooring load and 2.3 at ¾ inch plywood.
3) Provide calc`s for 6x12 bm over stairway area and size the footing.
4) Identify all shear walls on plans.
5) Provide a stairway detail showing size of stringers,rise and run and all
connections(details).
6) Sheet 6 of plans -clarify detail and description of the 1-hr wall. Make re-
ference to the UL No. or table 719.1(2) of the IBC 2000 and show item no.
7) Blow up the1 hr walldetail or separation wall.
8) Specify temp. glass at sliding glass doors.
9) Address all comments made by GP Architectural or structural.
10) Provide automatic fire sprinklers as required by Fire Department.
11) Provide smoke detectors.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/07/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/07/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed