Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM02431
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A copy of the stamped approved site plan is required with the submittal. |
| 06/04/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the design of the flues for the unit heaters to comply with Section 516.0, UPC 1994. 2. Provide calculations to show that the sizes of the flues for the unit heaters are adequate. Reference Section 512.4, UPC 1994. 3. Coordinate the natural gas input for the unit heaters with the schedule on sheet M2.1. Revise the gas piping as required. 4. Provide backflow protection for the ice machine, P-10. Reference Section 603.2, UPC 1994. 5. Relocate floor sink near the ice machine as required to conform to the accessibility requirements of Section 804.1, UPC 1994. 6. Clarify how the floor drains (P-12) with 2" traps and trap arms located in the trench drains (P-15) are capable of handling up to 30 gpm (Table 7-4) but the waste pipe has to be 3". 7. The minimum water pressure required for Haws' eyewashes is 30 PSI. Revise water pressure calculations as required. Reference Section 608.1, UPC 1994. 8. Use the fixture unit values shown in Tables 6-3, 7-3, and A-2 to calculate the water demand and waste loading. Include the demand for the evaporative coolers in the tabulation. Revise as required. 9. Clarify how the floor drain located in the wash rack is to be vented. 10. Provide upper terminal cleanout for floor drain at wash rack. Reference Section 707.4, UPC 1994. 11. Clarify how the butterfly valves are to be utilized in the waste piping. 12. The section of drainpipe from the wash rack to the butterfly valves appears to be used for both rainwater and wastewater. Show how this arrangement complies with Section D1.1a, UPC 1994. 13. Provide roof drainage calculations along with the sizes of the roof drains, overflows, and rain leaders. |
| 06/04/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the ventilation calculations for FCU-3, FCU-4, and FCU-5. The 24" offset for the enclosing walls is used to define the area into which the outside air is to be delivered - not the area of the space to be ventilated. Use the occupancy rate from Table 403.3 to determine the ventilation requirements for the dayroom. Reference Section 403.3, IMC 2000. 2. Provide the weight of the kitchen hood. Show how the hood is to be supported and provide structural calculations. Reference Section 507.6, IMC 2000. 3. Provide calculations to show that room 130 can maintain a temperature of 68°F on a design day. Reference Section 309.1, IMC 2000. |
| 06/04/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/10/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | waste water-cannot drain exterior wash rack to sewer. Needsww/imc review of oil/sand separator. Tom Tomchak-579-5771. Need to show location/method of connection to public sewer. |
| 06/17/2004 | Martin Haeberle | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Exit plan shows exiting from dayroom terminating on enclosed patio. Provide exit discharge to the exterior of the building per section 1006.1 IBC. The roofed patio is considered part of the building. 2. Padlocked flush bolt on gate is not considered an acceptable exiting locking device. References section 1003.3.1.8 IBC. 3. Provide letter to the Building Official for requested deferred submittal of stairs, steel joists. Note: Letter to contain estimated time of submittal. 4. Masonry special inspection to be level 2 due to the structure is an essential facility. Revise general structural notes. 5. Revise calculations for masonry pier analysis/ design to reflect criteria within the 2000 IBC. 6. Provide a copy of the soils report referenced within plans/calculations. 7. Provide calculations for stair foundation. Note: Stair to be designed utilizing a 100# live load. 8. Include occupant load of building on plans. 9. Include an architectural site plan. |
| 06/25/2004 | Linda Buczynski | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Keynote 14 on Sheet E1.1 refers to what appear to be guard posts, but the note itself pertains to conduit. Please clarify. 2. Luminaires P3 on the south side of the site are indicated on Circuit 40, but on the run to Circuit M-41. Please clarify, and recheck loads as necessary. 3. Ckt M-29 and M-25 have (5) Fixtures B3. Pls define on Luminaire Schedule. 4. Ckt M-31 appears to be undercounted, considering the 120 MAX VA on the Luminaire Schedule. However, the loading is appropriate for the 2-32W bulbs that these fixtures contain, per the same Luminaire Schedule. Please clarify, and evaluate M-33, M-35, & EMI-10 as well. 5. Fixture F1 schedule refers to Note 2, which is blank. 6. Account for load on Ckt EM-28 on panel schedule. 7. It appears that 500 VA for the largest motor is too low a figure for Panel M. 8. Please coordinate locations of Panels EM and M between Sheets E2.1 and E3.1. They appear to occupy the same position in the Equipment Room. 9. Dedicated 50A receptacle for range on Keynote 24 Sheet E3.1 has 1' conduit to Panel EM, but no such load on the panel schedule. Please clarify. 10. MCA for HP1-HP5 and FCU1-FCU-5 are higher on Panel M than they are on Sheet M2.1. Please coordinate with Mechanical Engineer and clarify. If the lower values are correct, the Ground Fault and Short Circuit Protection may be oversized. 11. Circuit EMI-11 has receptacle load (Comm Rm) on Power Plan, but is listed as a spare on the panel schedule. 12. SF-1 is 3-phase ¼ HP on Sheet M2.1, and single phase 1/3 HP on Circuit R-34,36. Please coordinate with Mechanical and clarify. 13. It appears that Circuit M-34 should read "EF-4" instead of EF-6. Please check other such circuits for consistency. 14. Some of the rooftop HVAC units appear to be out of 25' range for the maintenance receptacles, such as CU-6, EC-5, EC-1. 15. It appears that the first entry in the Phase B column of Panel M needs to be corrected to account for the relief hood and HP. 16. On Sheet E7.1 Detail F, the reference to NEC 384-3c does not appear to apply. Could the intent be to reference NEC 384-20? 17. On Sheet E7.1 Detail F, there are references to NEC 250-81c, 250-80a, and 250-79c. There are no such Code sections. 18. Electrical specifications 16620-9 2.02 call for a propane generator. A diesel generator is called for on the plans, Sheets E1.1 and E6.1. Please clarify. 19. It appears that the Washer on Ckt EM-9,11,13 should be protected by a 20A CB per NEC 422-11 (e) (2). 20. Please specify the KVA rating of the generator on the plans. 21. Please specify the number of poles of the ATS on the plans. 22. Please demonstrate compliance with the Sustainable Energy Code. http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Building_Codes/2000IECCSES_sustainable_energy.pdf 23. Provide pole and foundation detail for all lighting poles. All poles greater than 20' in height, such detail and calculations, shall be sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer. |
| 06/29/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | June 29, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments A. Zoning cannot appprove the building plans until the site plan has been approved. Zoning will review and approve the building plans once the building plans have been approved by all the commercial reviewers and the approved site plan is included with the building plans.. Two approved and stamped copies of the approved site plan, landscape and NNPO plans must be included with the building plans. B. This site is subject to the criteria of the Scenic Corridor Zone overlay. In addition to the approval of the site plan by DSD, approval of the Scenic Corridor Zone application and stamped plans is required. Please provide documentation related to the approval of the SCZ along with two coies of the approved site, landscape, and NPPO plans.. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/30/2004 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |