Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM01885
Parcel: 13821030F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T04CM01885
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/13/2004 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved 1. Provide complete fire sprinkler system design criteria on plans.
2. Type 1 kitchen exhaust hood with fire suppression system required for Kitchen cooking equipment. Indicate on plans.
10/21/2004 Robert Sherry PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a revised copy of sheet P1.
2. Provide the rim elevations of the next upstream and the next downstream sanitary manholes. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994.
3. The invert elevation of the building drain at the northwest corner of the building (2516.10 feet) is lower than the invert elevation at its "downstream" intersection with the north-south building drain (approximately 2517.69 feet). Revise the layout of the building drains as necessary to achieve the required slope (preferably ΒΌ" per foot inside of the building). Reference Section 708.0, UPC 1994.
4. Revise the size of the gas piping rooftop units AC-1, AC-2, AC-3, and AC-6 to comply with the requirements of Table 12-3, UPC 1994.
5. Show the gas piping to AC-9. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
6. Provide a vent for water closet P-2H located in room 110. Reference Section 901.0, UPC 1994.
7. Provide waste and vent riser diagram for room 129. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
8. Verify that the trap arm for P-8 in room 111 meets the requirements of Section 1002.3, UPC 1994. The maximum developed length for a 2" trap arm is 5'-0" and cleanouts are required for any changes in direction over 90 degrees.
9. Clarify the numbering of the plumbing fixtures; P-6 refers to both a shower and to a 2-compartment sink (sheet P5) and the 2-compartment sink is referred to as P-7 on sheet P3.
10. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 fps for the PVC and Copper piping. Revise pipe sizes as necessary. Reference Section A 6.1, UPC 1994; IAPMO IS 3-93, Section 610.0; and IAPMO IS 8-92, Section 610.1.
11. Indicate the maximum conductivity of the specified piping insulation. Reference Section 804.5, IECC 2000.
12. Provide hot water system temperature controls per Section 804.3, IECC 2000.
13. Provide heat traps for water heater WH-1. If the heat traps are not integral to the water heater, provide insulation on the first 8 feet of hot and cold water piping. Reference Sections 804.4 and 804.5, IECC 2000.
14. Section A-A of sheet A-5 shows rain gutters on the north and south sides of the metal building but the shop drawings for the metal building do not show any gutters. If gutters are to be furnished, show the gutter dimensions and the slope of the gutters. If gutters are not to be furnished, show that the specified scuppers, located second and third from the northeast corner of the porch, are capable of handling the design rainfall. Reference Sections D3.1 and D3.2, UPC 1994.
10/21/2004 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Show that the ventilation supplied by AC-4 and AC-5, and AC-6 complies with the requirements of Section 403.3.2, IMC 2000.
2. Justify the occupant load and amount of outdoor air per person used in the ventilation calculations for the nursery. Reference Section 403.3, IMC 2000.
3. A Type I hood is required over the range in the kitchen. Reference Section 507.2.2 IMC.
4. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2000.
10/21/2004 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/01/2004 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Circuits H1-2, H1-4, and H1-6 provide for site lighting. Site Plan shows only conduit and pullrope. If the intent is to provide conduit and pullrope only on this permit, please indicate "Future" on the above circuits at their panel schedule. Otherwise, provide full lighting design.
2. On Sheet E3, equipment EF-4 is indicated two times. On Sheet M1, one such location is EF-5. Coordinate with Mechanical and clarify.
3. Provide power for EF-5 as indicated on Sheet M3. Coordinate with Mechanical and clarify.
4. On Sheet E3, Electrical Feeder Schedule, it appears that the designations "L2- 33,35" and "L2-36, 38" should read "L1-33, 35" and "L1-36, 38."
5. Sheet E6 Electrical Load Summary for Panel L2 totals 102.1 A, but calls for a 100A panel. Panel schedule calls for a 150A panel. Pls clarify.
6. Sheet E6 Electrical Load Summary for Panel L1 counts continuous load at 1.1 KVA. Panel L2 counts continuous load at 21.8 KVA. Since Panel L1 powers Panel L2 its continuous load should not be less than that on L2. Pls clarify.
7. Sheet E6 Electrical Load Summary for Panel L1 totals 203.2 A, but calls for a 200A panel. Panel schedule calls for a 300A panel. Pls clarify.
8. Sheet E6 Electrical Load Summary for Panel L1 totals 203.2 A, but on sheet E5 Line Diagram the feeder is 3/0, with ampacity 200A. Pls clarify.
9. If the Panel L1 feeder is 3/0, the GND in the conduit should be sized at #4, not #6. Reference NEC Table 250.66 Footnote a.
10. If the Panel L1 feeder is 3/0, the Grounding Electrode Conductor at transformer should be sized at #6, not #8. Reference NEC 250.30 (A) (2) (a) and NEC 250.66 (A).
11/09/2004 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plans may not be approved prior to site plan approval. Provide two copies of a stamped/approved site plan with resubmittal.
11/16/2004 David Rivera ZONING REVIEW Approved
11/18/2004 Gerry Koziol WWM REVIEW Approved
11/22/2004 David Mann BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Sheet A-1 Detail structural support for folding partition.
Sheet S-1 Provide correct importance factor for building structure on plans and in calcualtions for large occupancy building.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/29/2004 LISA LESNY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/29/2004 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed