Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T04CM01811
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2004 | Jim Egan | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide information on warehouse/storage: a. Commodity stored. b. Method of storage. (Piled, Racks, Shelves or Palletized.) c. Height of storage. 2. Provide complete fire sprinkler system design criteria on plan: a. Design standard to be used. b. Hazard Classification. c. Minimum design density and area of application. d. Water Supply Information. Static___psi Residual___psi Flow___Gpm. |
| 05/04/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the roof slope complies with Section 1507.10.1, IBC 2000. 2. Show how the roof is capable of draining without ponding at columns 2, 2.5, 4, 4.5, 6, and 8. 3. Show the size and configuration of the downspouts referenced in the roof plan (detail 1/A2.3) 4. Provide rim elevation of next upstream sanitary manhole and first floor elevation. Determine need for backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 5. Provide site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 6. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building drain. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
| 05/04/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the energy code compliance certificate (detail 2/AC1.1) to be legible and to have a minimum font size of 10 points. |
| 05/04/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/06/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need civil drawings showing location/method of connection to public sewer |
| 05/18/2004 | DOUG LAAKSO | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | .. T04CM01811 .. 3675 E BRITANNIA DRIVE .. DGL .. 5/18/04 1ST REVIEW ITEMS #1 - #28 1. Shell building is limited to a single occupancy. Please reflect a single occupancy in the design of this warehouse, on drawings and code analysis. 2. Provide site plan showing real and assumed property lines. 3. Provide legal description of this property on the drawings and document the legal description. 4. Provide site plan showing grades with spot elevations clearly showing the accessibile route conforms from the finish floor of the building to the public access locations , including ramps, landings, parking, etc. Provide tie of grade to established datum. 5. Fully detail walls at SES including materials of construction, connections to structure above and below (w/fastener type, size, spacing/ number), fire listing on drawings for fire rating and details to conform with fire rating, ref drawing #A2.1 and A2.2. 6. Fully detail ladder and provide structural calculations or provide shop drawings and calculations if prefabricated. 7. Roof hatch : provide details on drawings or shop drawings and calculations. 8. Provide addressing per Pima County Addressing Ordinance on South and East elevation. 9. Provide continuous footing at line E-9 to 10. 10. Dimensionally locate roof -top mechanical units, roof hatches and fixtures from two adjacent walls on roof plan. 11. Indicate weights of roof -mounted equipment on roof plan. 12. Explain and justify opening extending to bottom of panel type 'E' on drawing # S-5. 13. Clarify dimensions for scissor lift detail 9/S6 , 1/A2.2. 14. Clarify how tilt-up walls conform to requirements of IBC, ref detail 11/S6. 15. Provide foundation design and details for light poles ref detail 1/E3. 16. Show site soils preparation including extent of fill below footings and continuous foundations on drawings per soils report. 17. Clarify bottom of footing elevations on plan S2 to show conformance with soils report and structural calculations. 18. Provide readable copies of calculation sheets #42 and #43, minimum 10 point font. 19. Provide complete sets of drawings #S7 missing from one set. 20. Clarify increased side lap connections provided per sheet #11 of calculations,on drawing #S3, coordinate. 21. Provide connection design in structural calculations for : beams, columns, joists, piping, tilt-up panels to ledger, tilt-up panels to adjacent panels and tilt-up panels to floor slab. 22. Provide inspection program conforming to Uniform Administrative Code - 1997 ed Sec 302.5. 23. Special inspection required for : 1. Site preparation, 2. Foundation excavation and compaction, 3. Tilt-up concrete panels, 4. Bolts installed in concrete, 5. Structural welding, 6. Field welding, 7. High-strength bolting, 8. Concrete, 9. Expansion anchors. 24. Submit two copies of Shop Drawings and Structural Calculations for : 1. Tilt-up concrete panels, 2. Structural steel, 3. Steel roof joists, 4. Steel roof decking; Shop Drawings and Structural Calculations are to be stamped and signed by an Arizona Registered Engineer and shall be reviewed by and bear the approval stamp of the Architect or Engineer of Record prior to submission to the City of Tucson Development Services Department, for review and approval by the City of Tucson Development Services Department prior to erection. 25. Show where anchorage design per IBC Sec 1604.8 is provided for in structural calculations and on the drawings. 26. Separate Building Permits required for Tenant Improvement/Occupancy. 27. Storage racks over 8 feet high require a Building Permit. 28. Separate Permit required for signage Questions? Call Douglas Laakso, Structural Plans Examiner with City of Tucson - Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x 1111. |
| 05/18/2004 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | This was sufficiently covered in Note 12 on Sheet E1, but treating it separately here with different instructions could be confusing. |
| 05/21/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plans may not be approved prior to Site Plan approval. See Engineering comments under "Site" workflow. |
| 05/24/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 24, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: Zoning will review and approve the building plans once the structural and commercial reviewers have approved the building plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2004 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |