Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T04CM01767
Parcel: 124180370

Address:
1436 E 17TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T04CM01767
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/20/2004 Jim Egan FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Minimum one hour fire rated occcupancy separation required between warehouse and office/retail area. Openings protected with minimum one hour fire rated assemblies.
2. Required exit doors must swing in the direction of eggress. (Exterior Door #2.)
3. Doors #10 and #13 shall have no locking hardware. Indicate so on plan.
4. Remove exit sign over Door #7. Exit through warehouse not permitted.
04/21/2004 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide floor plan drawn to scale. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
2. Provide drinking fountain as required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2000.
3. Include all fixtures and water outlets (e.g. evaporative coolers, irrigation) when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994.
4. Revise the size of the water supply to P-3 to comply with the submitted calculations.
5. Coordinate the locations of the water service and the building sewer as shown on the site plan with the plumbing plan. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
6. Provide location and sizing information for gutters and downspouts. Reference Appendix D, UPC 1994.
7. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994.
04/21/2004 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide floor plan drawn to scale. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
2. Coordinate the mechanical floor plan and the ventilation calculations with the architectural floor plan (A.1). Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
3. Relocate smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections. Reference Section 606.1, IMC 2000.
4. Clarify heat pump schedule with regard to CU-1.
5. Show the size of the vents for the unit heaters and provide a detail for the vent penetration of the roof.
04/21/2004 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
04/22/2004 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied City of Tucson, Development Services
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS
1) Minimum 1-hr rated occupancy separation required between ware-
house and office/retail area. Openings protected with minimum 1-hr
fire rated assemblies.
2) Required exit doors shall swing in the diection of exit. Exit door 2
3) Door 13 and 10 shall contain no locking hardware. Show on door schedule.
4) Remove exit sign over #7.
5) How is the overhead door connected to the lintel beam. Show a detail.
6) A soils report is required when using values of passive pressure and coefficient
of friction of 250psi and .3 respectively.
7) Re; Varco Prudence building plans, referance all details back to plans. (Detail sheets 31-38)
05/03/2004 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
05/17/2004 Linda Buczynski ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Ckt C-6,8 does not have load allocation on panel schedule.
2. Panel C Phase A is undercounted. It appears to be 12,610 VA, not 2310. This increases the total load on both Panel C and main service, and causes Phase A on Panelboard A to be overloaded at 224A, and.
3. Note B on Sheet E3 refers the Contractor to panelboard schedule for smoke detector circuitry. Could not find such circuitry on any panelboard.
4. Please eliminate the bond in the conduit between the CT cabinet and the gutter, and between the TEP X'FMR and the CT cabinet, as it constitutes a parallel path to ground on the line side of the service disconnect.
5. Please provide calculations demonstrating compliance with the 1998 IECC.
05/18/2004 Loren Makus ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Development plan must be approved before building plans can be approved.
05/19/2004 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied May 19, 2004

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Senior Planner

Comments:

Two copies of the approved and stamped development/site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with building plans. (As of this review date, CDRC has not approved the development plan.)

Also, a SITE CARD with Copies of the approved development plan, Landscape and NPPO plans with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO are required before final approval of the building plans. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. No fees are required in re-stamping the development plan as an approved site plan.

Zoning will review and approve the building plans once the structural and commercial reviewers have approved the building plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/25/2004 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed