Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T04CM01434
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2004 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 20, 2004 TO: Creative Endeavors SUBJECT: Site Plan, Que Bonita Furniture Site Plan REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T04CM01434 SUMMARY: The Site Plan was reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on May 20, 2004. The Site Plan was not approved at this time. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: The Engineering comments from the previous review do not appear to have been addressed. Please address all of the previous comments: 1) Provide dimensions and bearings for all property boundaries. Please use a bold solid line for the property lines, for clarity. (Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.A.5)) 2) Clearly show proposed drainage patterns, including roof drainage. Show that sidewalks and pedestrian routes will be kept flood free for up to 10-year events. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 and DS 2-08.3.1) 3) Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.17) 4) 4) A letter from City of Tucson Environmental Services will be required to approve the proposed arrangement for solid waste pickup. 5) 5) Indicate on the site plan that Tanque Verde Road is an MS&R route and provide recordation information. 6) 6) All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.16) 7) 7) The Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson, Arizona limit the number of driveways crossing arterials and collectors to two per three hundred feet. The driveways must be at lease eighty feet apart. Revise the sight plan to comply with the Access Management Guidelines or obtain approval for the proposed access locations from the City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Traffic Engineering Division. Additionally, the existing and future sight visibility triangles must be on the site plan as well as on the landscape plan. Revise the Site Plan to address these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining in detail how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/25/2004 | Andrew Connor | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 6' wall is required to screen loading area from Tanque Verde Rd. per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2. Landscape borders on either side of ingress and egress appear to be measured inconsistently revise as necessary LUC 3.7.2.4.A. 3. A screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.3. The screen walls indicated along Tanque Verde Rd. encroach more than 3' into buffer. |
| 05/25/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/27/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 05/27/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSC TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T04CM01434 "Que Bonita" Furniture 6934 E. Tanque Verde Road Site Plan Transmittal date: 2nd Review May 26, 2004 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, WHICH STATES HOW ALL ZONING REVIEW SECTION COMMENTS regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Previous comments that were not completely addressed have been left in their entirety for reference. See Zoning Reviewer redlines for more information related to the comments. 1. All text including dimensions must be 12 point. Please adjust the text height as required. (Previous Comment: All text height must be a minimum of 12 point (.12). Please adjust the text height of the Major Street names on the location map as redlined on the plan sheets. Also draw and label the COT and Pima County jurisdiction limits.) All text that is less than 12 point must be adjusted. Please adjust as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 2. The legend does include the line work used for the existing or proposed building. It is hard to tell where the existing building is on the plan since all the lines have the same line weight. The property line boundary is also not included in the legend and is hard to see on the plan as a screened line. (Previous Comment: Please define and dimension all exterior walls of the existing and proposed buildings. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6) 3. I acknowledge that new driveways are not proposed. This site must meet full code compliance. One of the requirements is that existing and future sight visibility triangles be shown on the site plan. Per your response the comment was addressed, but the SVT's have not been shown or labeled on the plan. (Previous Comment: Draw and label existing and future sight visibility triangles. Lines of sight may not be obscured through the triangle between 30 inches and six feet from grade through the triangle. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) 5. The proposed access ramp for the handicapped parking space cannot be placed with the access aisle. The ramp must be relocated out of the aisle. The access ramp can be placed on the sidewalk as long as a four-foot flat landing is provided at the back of the access ramp. It appears by the plan that there is sufficient area within the sidewalk under the covered porch to place the access ramp. The wedge curb as shown on the plan for the concrete sidewalk is not an approved method of physical separation of the pedestrian sidewalk from the PAAL. A vertical curb must be constructed. Please address and revise both items. (Previous Comment: Please address the following pedestrian and handicapped access items.) a. Provide a detail drawing of the proposed handicapped access ramps. The detail must include the length of the ramp and the slope. An access ramp is required from the crosswalk to the sidewalk leading to the front entrance of the building. An access ramp is also required from the handicapped access aisle to the sidewalk. b. A minimum four-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required along the south side of the existing building between the parking spaces and the south wall. Add, label and dimension the sidewalk as required. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. The location type and size of the sign was not shown or labeled. (Previous Comment: Show the location of the freestanding existing sign. The type and size must be labeled. The sign may not be within the existing or future sight visibility triangle. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13) 7. This comment was not completely addressed. (Previous Comment: Clarify if the joint use driveway has been recorded in some document. If so please provide a copy of the document with the next submittal packet. List the docket and page number of the recorded document on the plan. If this driveway has not been recorded or approved by Traffic Engineering please contact Dale Kelch with Traffic Engineering for requirements on curb cuts and allowances for joint use driveways. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11) 8. This comment was not completely addressed. The recordation information was not included. Previous Comment: If applicable, all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 10. This comment was not addressed. (Previous Comment: Dimension existing and future curb to property line. Show, label, and dimension the existing or future sidewalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21) 11. Please insure that the revised site plan and the landscape plan match before re-submitting for review. DS 2-02.2.1.A.C 15. Please see Zoning redlines and revise as required. (Previous Comment: List the following items under the site area calculations. Allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Allowed, existing and proposed building height. The number of required and provided loading spaces. List under the bicycle parking calculation that the type of bicycle facility to be provided is Class Two and that the handicapped space that has been provided is a van accessible.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and landscape plan and requested documents. |