Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T04CM00284
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2004 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | see comments of 4/9/04 |
| 05/17/2004 | Robert Sherry | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the exhaust hoods are supported in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2000. 2. Provide occupant loads based on Table 403.3, IMC 2000. Clarify meaning of "outside air setpoint". Reference Section 403, IMC 2000. |
| 05/17/2004 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference Appendix A, UPC 1994. 2. Revise the fixture count to match the number of fixtures shown on the floor plans. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994. 3. Include all fixtures and water outlets when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Use the fixture units shown in Tables 6-3 and A-2 (1994 UPC). Include the pressure drop from the RPBP in the water calculations. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 1994. 4. Comment not addressed. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine need for backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 1994. 5. Revise the slope of the 6" building sewer to comply with Section 718.1, UPC 1994. Provide information to justify using a 6" building sewer rather than a 4" building sewer. 6. Provide information to show that the method used for the natural gas pipe sizing calculations complies with the intent of the Code. Reference Section 301.2.2, UPC 1994. 7. Revise the location of hose bibb HB2. It is mounted below the roof hatch and cannot physically comply with the requirements noted in Table 6-1 for atmospheric vacuum breakers. Reference Section 603.2.6, UPC 1994. |
| 05/24/2004 | Doug Laakso | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | .. T04CM00284 .. 3925 E GRANT ROAD .. DGL .. SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS .. .. #1 THROUGH #9 .. 6/2/04 .. Please resubmit two COMPLETE sets of current drawings for review and a set/s of the prior reviewed drawings for reference. S1. See prior comment #S26, though the page numbers may have changed these corrections still need to be made, so review may be completed. ( S26. Provide readable Structural Calculations , Please make pages #8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 34 and 39 readable.) S2. See prior comment #S27, please provide requested information.( S27. Provide sketches in Structural Calculations showing locations of design elements, loads and forces in structures (building , canopy, site), per IBC Sec 1603.) S3. See prior comment #S29, please explain why dead load of 12 psf is used throughout , this seems to be rather light. ( S29. Clarify Dead Loads compliance with IBC Sec 1606,ref P1 of Structural Calculations.) S4. See prior comment #S31, explain compatibility of existing wall to new structure within ie: bond beams, chord continuity, stress changes ; justify use of epoxy anchors in fire rated wall ,detail 5/S5. ( S31. Clarify Lateral Analysis including existing walls, chords, ledgers, seismic ties of roof diaphragm to walls.) S5. See prior comment #S32, explain conformance to International Building Code of UBC based calculations pages #72 through #79, also locate on sketches in calculations.( S32. Clarify Footing Design.) S6. See prior comment #S33, please provide requested calculations. ( S33. Provide Structural Design Calculations for Drive-thru Canopy, ref 1/S5.2 and 2/S5.2.) S7. See prior comment #S34, explain transformer loading ( my understanding is each transformer weighs 1000 pounds, seeming to exceed the 400#/joist loading per Note #15 on S3, also clarify the support system from the steel joist ). ( S34. Provide calculations for support of miscellaneous equipment, including suspended electrical transformer 7/E3, canopy 6/S5.2, jib crane A4, satellite dish 5/A4.1, flagpole 15/A2.1, etc per IBC Sec 1621.) S8. See prior comment #S36 ,ref comment #S37,please provide Inspection Program. ( S36. Provide Inspection Program for each type of Special Inspection Required, per Uniform Administrative Code (1997), Sec 302.5. S37. Special Inspection required for : 1. Soils 2. Concrete 3. Masonry 4. Epoxy anchors 5. Expansion anchors 6. Field Welding 7. Shop welding 8. High-strength bolting 9. Seismic per 7/S0 schedule As noted.) S9. See prior comment #S38, provide requested information.( S38. Fully detail structural connections of new construction to Existing construction at wall footings, roof to existing walls, new masonry wall to existing masonry wall at footing, stem wall, horizontal bond beams, including top of wall, roof line and intermediate.) Please provide response letter addressing these comments. Questions? Call Douglas Laakso, Structural Plans Examiner COT- DSD, At (520) 791-5550 x 1111. |
| 06/02/2004 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E2.2 1. "Provide transformer weight for evaluation by Structural Plans Examiner, who may require more information on Detail 7/E3." This comment was made on the first submittal. According to the information received in the second submittal, the weight of such transformer exceeds the joist loading. Coordinate with your Structural Engineer. Sheet E4 1. Feeder B20, consisting of derived conductors of a derived AC system, shall have its equipment ground sized per Table 250-66, Note 1. Thus the copper ground shall be 2/0, not #1. The aluminum ground shall be 4/0, not 2/0. Please re-evaluate conduit sizing as well. 2. Feeder C22, consisting of derived conductors of a derived AC system, shall have its equipment ground sized per Table 250-66, Note 1. Thus the copper ground shall be 2/0, not 1/0. The aluminum ground shall be 4/0, not 3/0. Please re-evaluate conduit sizing as well. 3. Please clarify that equipment terminals and overcurrent protective devices at Racks A, C, and D are rated for the Available Fault Current. 4. Please clarify that equipment terminals and overcurrent protective devices at RTU are rated for the Available Fault Current. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2004 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/09/2004 | LISA LESNY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |