Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T04BU02370
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2004 | Paul Machado | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Ryan G. Bale, P.E. DATE: October 12, 2004 EEC, Inc. 4625 E. Ft. Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: Houghton Road Commercial, 7511 S. Houghton Rd. Grading Plan T04BU002370 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. The GP cannot be approved prior to the approval of the DP. 3. Show GP activity number (T04BU02370) on all sheets. 4. The minimum setback for a cut or fill slopes is 2' from the property line. Revise where aplicable. 5. Add this note to the general notes: "All grading shall conform to D.S. 11-01.0". 6. Correct section P/5 to reflect a 200' future R/W. The present R/W is 150" wide and sidewalks on the MS&R plan are 5' in width. 7. This comment was also made on the Development Plan: The steel pipes must remain on inside of the refuse enclosure to protect the walls from damage while being serviced. Please revise detail per D.S. 6-01.4.2. C.2. Also there are two enclosures at the SE of the project that are situated where they cannot be serviced without having to perform unnecessary movement of the truck. Perhaps skewing either enclosure at the SE corner of the property in the opposite direction will rectify this situation. Then the service truck will then be able to use a "loop" route. Please revise. 8. Upon a recent site visit, an abandoned water well was found. Please contact Az. Dept. of Water resources for abandonment procedures at 770-3800. Please provide documentation when complete. 9. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns. 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. Note 25 will suffice for the Development Plan but must be more detailed on the GP. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 12. Explain the discrepancy of the basin elevations between the DR and the GP. 13. Show cross-sections of and add dimensions to the Detention/Retention basin on the plans. This aids in inspection as well as construction. 14. The Detention/Retention basin must be graded to drain. 15. Provide a detail and cross-section of the concrete channel where the basin discharges onto Meadow Willow Drive and a detail of the channel North of bldg. no. 4. A scupper will be required at the sidewalk. 16. The TEP transformer at the NE entrance appears to be in the SVT. No obstructions higher than 30" are allowed in the SVT. Revise as necessary. 17. Call out the "swales" at the north boundary line and provide additional spot elevations and a x-cross section. Drainage report: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Include Hydrologic Data Sheets for each of the developed drainage areas. 3. Provide a maintenance access ramp to the basin with a maximum 8:1 slope. 4. Provide a detail and cross-section of the concrete channel where the basin discharges. 5. Provide a detail and cross-section of the concrete channel where the basin discharges onto Meadow Willow Drive and provide the velocity of the discharge onto Meadow Willow Trail as well as the WSEL crossing the road to ensure all-weather access. 6. Add the basin maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 7. Security barriers must be provided at the top of all basins slopes steeper than 4:1, where depths exceed two feet per the Stormwater det./ret. manual 3.6.2. The barriers must provided adjacent to all pedestrian areas. 8. Include the existing and developed discharges on Meadow Willow Drive. 9. Include a statement in the DR that you have reviewed and agree to the data for the channel east of the project and for Desert Willow Estates. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: Operators Identify all operators for the project site, and the areas over which each operator has control. (Part IV.C.1) Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with operational control over project specifications (including the ability to make modifications in specifications). (Part IV.B.2.c) Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where the operator has operational control over project specifications, including the ability to make modifications in specifications. (Part IV.B.1.b) Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with day-to-day operational control of those activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. Provide a table for recording the names and responsibilities for each party responsible for activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. (Part IV.B.1.d) Indicate in the SWPPP the areas of the project where each operator has operational control over day-to-day activities. (Part IV.B.2.c) Site Description Provide an estimate of the runoff coefficient of the site for both the pre-construction and post-construction conditions. (Part IV.C.2.d) Provide data describing the soil and any existent data on the quality of any discharge from the site. (Part IV.C.2.d) Provide a general location map (e.g., U.S.G.S. quadrangle map, a portion of a city or county map, or other map) with enough detail to identify the location of the construction site and the receiving waters within one mile of the site. (Part IV.C.2.e) Show on the location map the receiving waters within one mile of the construction site. (Part IV.C.2.e) Identify the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry sloughs, arroyos. (Part IV.C.4) (NOTE: If applicable, the SWPPP must also identify the areal extent and describe any wetlands near the site that could be disturbed or that could potentially receive discharges from disturbed areas of the project.) Site Map 1. Show, on the site map, locations of structural and nonstructural controls identified in the SWPPP. (Part IV.C.3.c) 2. Show, on the site map, locations of off-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage areas. (Part IV.C.3.e) Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources 3. Identify and address offsite material storage areas or borrow areas used solely by the operator's project. (Part IV.C.6) Erosion and Sediment Controls 4. Specify that when sediment escapes the construction site, offsite accumulations of sediment must be routinely removed and at a frequency sufficient to ensure no adverse effects on water quality. (Part IV.D.2.a) (Part IV.D.2.c) 5. Describe good housekeeping procedures to prevent litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals exposed to stormwater from becoming a pollutant source for stormwater discharges. (Part IV.D.3) Non-Stormwater Discharges 6. Describe measures to minimize the generation of dust. (Part IV.D.8.b) 7. Describe construction and waste materials expected to be stored on-site. Provide a page or pages to record updates as appropriate. Describe controls to reduce pollutants from these materials including storage practices to minimize exposure of the materials to stormwater, and spill prevention and response practices. (Part IV.D.8.c) Inspections 8. When either of the following conditions apply, the operator is required to routinely inspect only once each month, and anytime rain is predicted, and within 24 hours of the end of each storm event of 0.5 inches or greater.: a. The site has been temporarily stabilized; b. Construction is occurring during the seasonal dry period; 9. Under the title "Specific Recommendations" on page 6, a 280' concrete drainageway is to be removed. Omit or explain this statement. 10. The "Pollution Prevention Plan Certification" and the "Qualification Statement" on sheets 12 and 13 respectively, must be signed prior to SWPPP approval. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 7511 S Houghton RD. Grad |
| 10/18/2004 | David Rivera | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 18, 2004 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Senior Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Two copies of the approved and stamped development/site plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with grading plan. 3. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan, may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 10/18/2004 | Andrew Connor | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2004 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/19/2004 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |