Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T03CM04472
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: SOLAR INDUSTRIES T03CM04472 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with development standards 2-02 site content and specifications. Additional review for compliance with development standards, 2-08, 2-09, 3-01, and 3-05 has been made. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Sheet C1.1 addresses the taper for Tucson Blvd. but not for Bilby Rd. The MS&R plan must address how current code items, parking, landscape and access will be met at the time of widening. See engineering & landscape comments. It appears the MS&R taper has been deleted from this plan. Provide documentation from COT Traffic Engineering, which states that the taper will not be required and that there is no dedication of right-of-way required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A19. 3. This comment has not been addressed. Again this project is proposed to be built per sheet C1 not C1.1 the reduction in parking is not allowed until the dedication or taking of ROW is completed. Revise the parking calculation. If there is no dedication of right-of-way then there is no MS&R adjustment available for use in the parking calculation. Revise the calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t03cm04472.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/15/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/30/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/30/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit the COT approved landscape and NPP plans. The application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Plan submitted is not the COT approved version. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Revise landscape plans as necessary to comply with the revised site plan. On-site inspection indicates that the landscape layout has changed. Include all revised site conditions on the landscape plans. |
| 12/19/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied |