Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T03CM03284
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2003 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/06/2003 | Loren Makus | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/06/2003 | Loren Makus | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 6, 2003 TO: Debbie Shinstine, PE SUBJECT: Family Dollar (Park and Drexel) Site Plan Review REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T03CM03284 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Drainage Report were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division. The site plan was not approved at this time. The Drainage Report was accepted for site plan review purposes. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1) Provide additional finish grades and spot elevations for the project site and the adjacent areas. Provide sufficient information to show that the proposed drainage will work and to show that off-site flows will be accepted. (City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) 2-02.2.1.A.23) 2) Show roof drainage patterns. Provide sidewalk scuppers at each downspout location and indicate that all flows up to a 10-year event will be conveyed under sidewalks. (DS 2-02.1.A.16 and DS 2-08.5.1.E) 3) Provide the basis of bearing. (DS 2-02.2.1A.5) 4) Provide basis of elevation. (DS 2-02.2.1A.5) 5) Correct the spelling in general notes 20 and 25. In note 20 change "STER" TO "DUMPSTER" and in note 25 change "MAINTENING" to "MAINTAINING." Revise the site plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies for review. Include copies of the drainage report and a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/11/2003 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: T03CM03284 New Store (General Merchandise) Family Dollar, 5713 S Park Ave TRANSMITTAL: August 12, 2003 DUE DATE: August 15, 2003 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The address of this project must be placed on the site plan. DS 2-02.1.A.3 2. Since this is a portion of a lot, a lot-split history is required. 3. The street setbacks along Drexel Road and Park Avenue are the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the building form the back of future curb. Please revise the site plan and general note 4. DS 2-02.1.A.7 LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.1 4. The ten (10) foot landscaping buffer may not be placed the future ROW. Written permission is required from the City Engineer, Andy Dinauer (791-4239), to place any portion of the landscape buffer in the future ROW. In addition, the landscape buffer cannot be used as the drainage basin. 5. Please provide the existing and future SVTs at the intersection of Park and Drexel. DS 2-02.1.A.10 6. Depict any and all easements on the site plan. Identify the purpose of each easement along with the recording information. Also identify all proposed easements as described previously. DS 2-02.1.A.20 7. Please delineate the proposed outdoor lighting layout and identify the types of lighting on the site plan. DS 2-02.1.A.25 8. Provide the actual FAR provided in the general notes. DS 2-02.2.A.3 9. Provide the sign detail for the handi-cap spaces. 10. If general note 28 is to remain on the plan, the proposed landscape plan prior to widening must be provided and reviewed prior to approval of the site plan. This plan appears to have taken the future widening into account. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/13/2003 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comment # 9. |
| 08/18/2003 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The required street landscape borders must be located based on the MS&R right of way lines for Park Avenue and Drexel Road in order for the project to comply with MS&R requirements. Submit site/landscape plans for review which indicate "how the project will comply with LUC requirements whenthe MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site" per LUC 2.8.3.5.F. The next submittal should include current and future site/landscape plans. 2) If the project includes temporary use of the MS&R right of way area, a covenant and future site/landscape plan exhibit must be recorded. LUC 2.8.3.5.F After the future site and landscape plans have been conditionally approved and the covenant has been accepted by staff, the documents must then be recorded before the plans are approved. The recording information must then be added to the site and landscape plans. 3) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 "if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets". Provide letter of approval from the City Engineer for any landscaping proposed within the MS&R right of way in conjunction with the current or future plans. 4) Revise the landscape plans to locate proposed screening in compliance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C. Vegetative screens may not encroach into the street landscape border more than three feet. 5) Trees are required within the proposed detention basin at a ratio of 20 per acre. Revise the plans to comply with the Stormwater Retention Detention Manual p. 91. |
| 08/21/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan or an Application for Exception. LUC 3.8 The plans will not be accepted for resubmittal with the required information. OK to re-submit from the Landscape Section is required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2003 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/25/2003 | TAMI ACHONG | REJECT SHELF | Completed |