Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T03CM02796
Parcel: 11628001E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL

Permit Number - T03CM02796
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/15/2003 EROSE1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review
10/15/2003 EROSE1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review
10/15/2003 STANTEC 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SCOPE OF REVIEW:

The scope of this review covers electrical for Wings A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I, & J only and is the second review for those wings. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

The project was reviewed under the City of Tucson's local amendments to UBC Chapter 11. All accessibility requirements must be identified and detailed on the plans according to those rules and guidelines.


GENERAL:

q This review does not include review of any kitchen electrical design information.

q The comments below, unless noted otherwise, were contained in the first review and not satisfactorily resolved in the second submittal.

A, B, & C ELECTRICAL:

q On Sheet E3.4, circuit 224VD is not defined.

q On Sheet E3.3, show sheet continuation information for the connections from the automatic transfer switches and the generator. This is typical for the power riser diagrams for all wings.

q On Sheet E3.5, cable size shown for fault point 54 does not match cable size shown on the one line diagram on sheet E3.3 since the cable type, 224VD, is not defined.

D & E ELECTRICAL:

q On Sheet E4.13, Panel D5HA and Panel D5HB load summary information does not match.

G & H ELECTRICAL:

q On Sheet E3.2, circuit 224 is not defined.

q On Sheet E3.2, show AIC ratings of all automatic transfer switches.

q On Sheet E4.6, the load calculation for panel G4PA contains the incorrect number of suites, given panel G4PA is series connected with G4PB and G4PC via feed-through lugs.

I & J ELECTRICAL:

Sheet E3.1 still contains multiple mistakes. Please thoroughly review this power riser diagram and validate in writing that all design information is correct and coordinated.

q On Sheet E3.1, circuit 804 is not defined in the feeder, conduit and conductor schedule.

q On Sheet E3.1, circuit conductor feeding MCC-1 is not properly protected by the 600A feeder circuit breaker in SES-1, if 403 has a 400A capacity.

q On Sheet E3.1, show the AIC rating of the chiller VFDs.

q On Sheet E3.1, why is the normal feeder to ATS #2 a different circuit type than the feeder to DLHP from ATS #2?

q On Sheet E3.1, the circuit conductors feeding CT #1 and CT #2 are not properly protected by the 100A feeder circuit breakers in SES #1

q On Sheet E3.1, conductor schedule for circuit 353VD is not upsized compared to the conductor schedule for circuit 353. Please confirm voltage drop calculations and revise the conductor schedules accordingly.

q On Sheet E3.1, what is the panel name that is fed by the feed through from panel "IP1SH?

q On Sheet E4.1, wrong panel board legend.

q On Sheet E4.5, verify circuit breaker sizes in DHLP for all ATS loads. The 60-amp circuit breaker feeding ATS #2 is overloaded compared to the load shown in the panel schedule.

-End of Review-
10/15/2003 ELAINE ROSE ZONING REVIEW Needs Review
10/15/2003 EROSE1 WATER REVIEW Needs Review
10/15/2003 EROSE1 FIRE REVIEW Needs Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/15/2003 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed