Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02CM05567
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/01/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | 1. Provide clarification of relationship of 20"x18" RA duct to AC-1 and fire-resistive wall around Electrical Room 117. Reference Section 715, IBC. 2. Since the pitch of the roof is very close to 3:12 (2.916:12), please provide special inspection to ascertain that the pitch of the roof meets the design criteria. |
| 04/01/2003 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | 1. Show fixture and flow control device connected to GT-1 on waste and vent isometric (detail 2, sheet P2.1). Reference Section 1011.0, UPC. Second request. 2. Provide location and sizing information for gutters and downspouts. Reference Appendix D, UPC. 3. Relocate flow control device for grease trap, GT-1, to comply with Section 1011.3, UPC. Coordinate venting for GT-1 on plans (sheet P1.1) and isometric (detail 2, sheet P2.1). |
| 04/04/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/15/2003 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT LBUCZYN1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. Sheet E4 1. The additional loads in the Building E restroom do not coordinate with the Panel Schedule. Circuits NPE1-19,21,23 and NPE1-20,22,24 power a 3-phase load on this sheet. On the Panel Schedule Circuits 19, 22, & 24 are bussed spaces, Circuits 21,23 are 2-pole, and Circuit 20 is half of a 2-pole. Please clarify, and revise load calculations as appropriate, including Panel NPE and overall load calculations. Sheet E9 1. Load calculations for Panel NPC do not accurately capture the feeders to Panels KP or NPCA. Please readjust for this panel schedule and for overall load calculations, which now show 1829A on a 2000A service. Sheet E10 1. "Feeders for Panels CPC and CPE, serve primarily nonlinear loads, thus the neutrals would have to be considered as current-carrying per 301-15 (b) (4) (c). Thus the 3/0 conductors would not be protected by the 200 A CBs." This comment was made with the first submittal. To clarify the intent, the 3/0 conductors have an ampacity of 200 before the application of any derate factors. According to 310-15 (b) (4) (c), on a 4-wire, 3-phase wye circuit where the major portion of the load consists of non-linear loads, the neutral shall be considered a current-carrying conductor. Thus Feeder 2C has 5-Current-Carrying conductors for the purpose of Table 310-15(b) (2) (a). Applying the ).80 multiplyer to 200 gives an ampacity of 160A, which is not protected by the 200 AF. A 175 AF would meet Code requirements. 2. "No equipment ground shall be installed in conduit with service entrance conductors." This comment was made with the first submittal. The service entrance conductors are in conduit 20B, which still contain a 250 KCMIL GND, which needs to be removed to prevent the establishment of a parallel path to ground. Dealing with this comment by removing the Equipment Grounding Conductors from the Feeders to the panels in the remote buildings raises other questions. See the following comment. 3. Please refer to Article 250-32, Two or More Buildings Supplied from a Common Service. Section B on Grounded Systems describes requirements for Case 1, where the equipment grounding conductor is run with the supply conductors to the separate building or structure disconnecting means, and Case 2, where the equipment grounding conductor is not run with the supply conductors to the separate building or structure disconnecting means. Since Case 2 is being proposed for the current project, the design and installation shall comply with 250-32 (b) (2), which also requires that if there are no continuous metallic paths bonded to the grounding system in both buildings or structures involved, the grounded conductor run with the supply to the building or structure shall be connected to the building or structure disconnecting means and shall be used for grounding or bonding. According to the Plumbing/Mechanical Plans Examiner, the Contractor will have the option of using either metallic or non-metallic piping for water supply and fire protection. And the Line Diagram shows Metal Piping Bond. None of the Panels in Buildings B-E show the N-G bond, which would need to be there if the Plumbing Contractor goes with metal per the above. Please clarify. |
| 05/01/2003 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2003 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |