Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM05549
Parcel: 130054980

Address:
2210 E 33RD ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T02CM05549
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/11/2003 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Note 9 and the revised note 14 on sheet 3M1 are contradictory; please revise.
2. Coordinate mechanical components listed in Summary Compliance Report with equipment specified on drawings. Second request.
04/11/2003 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Modify second GCO from building (sheet 3MP1) to comply with Section 719.4, UPC. Second request.
2. Indicate the inverts of the new building sewer at its points of connection to the existing building sewer as well as its minimum slope. Reference Sections 718.1 and 718.3, UPC 1994. Second request.
3. Verify size of RPBP after meter (detail 6/m2) complies to Section 610.2, UPC 1994. The table on sheet 3P1, referenced in the response to the review comments was not found. Note: Sheet 3MP1 (note 7) calls for 2" Domestic Water Service but sheet 3P1 shows a 3" BSW.
4. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over service sink S-1 is not approved location. Reference Section 608.5, UPC 1994.
5. Provide design of mounting method for suspended water heater. Coordinate water heater detail with plans and riser diagrams. Indicate height of water heater platform. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code 1994.
6. No shut off valve may be located between the water heater and the thermal expansion tank. Reference Section 608.3, UPC 1994.
7. Coordinate stack and riser diagram with floor plan. Second request.
8. Coordinate natural gas calculations with heating capacity of rooftop units on mechanical plans. Second request.
9. Routing of the FP pipe from the FDC to the building, as shown on sheet 3MP1, does not agree with sheet 3P1. Please coordinate.
05/05/2003 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
05/06/2003 MARTIN HAEBERLE BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. See Duffy School Comment #1

4. See Duffy School Comment #4

5. Room 100 and 103 requires a one-hour fire barrier for separation from main use. References section 302.1 IBC. Revise plans
Note see sheet 3 A2 each room exceeds 100 square feet

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/07/2003 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed