Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM05314
Parcel: 13316013B

Address:
6500 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T02CM05314
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/15/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Approved
11/15/2002 JAMES TATE FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved
11/18/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/08/2002 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Please submit original plans with re-submittal.

Please refer to drawings for correlation to review comments.

This is a partial review. Please verify correctness of all branch circuits.

Sheet E1
1. Generator appears to be overloaded feeding both Panel HVE-1 and Panel LPE-1.
2. Provide overall load calculations for this project.
3. Show available fault current at ATS, and its rating.
4. Motor RTU-19 is shown as 3-phase supplied by 480 V here, but on M11 is shown as single phase supplied by 208.
5. There is insufficient information on the power requirements for RTU-19 and RTU-20.
6. Conductors have not been sized for RTU-19 and RTU-20.


Sheet E3
1. 1. Specify "flexible connection" as it appears in Keynote, and every other place where it appears.
2. Keynotes 6 & 7, grid area 9-D. Circuitry on Sheet E8 does not clearly show which receptacles are to be used for the display lighting.
3. For fixtures "N1" on HV-2 Ckts 23 & 25, recheck actual loads. For example, on Ckt 23 (66 fixtures) (59 watts) = 3953 W > 2.1 KVA on Panel Schedule.
4. Check Circuits HV-2, 27 & 29. It appears that Ckt 27, for example, should have 3.4 KVA, and 2.3 is listed on Panel Schedule.
5. Receptacle near Gridline 7B on Ckt LP-6, 20. There is no Panel LP-6.
6. Room 105 lighting circuit. There is no Panel LP-1, but LV-1 Circuit 1 shows "Room 105 Mirror Lights at 0.7 KVA.


Sheet E4
1. CKT LP-23, feeding receptacle in grid space 10G, goes to a spare with zero KVA on the panel schedule.
2. CKT LV-1/4 has only .2 KVA on Panel Schedule, yet it powers a pole type "m" which appears to have two receptacles. (2) (82) = 360 > 0.2 KVA. Also check CKT LV-1/9 and LV-2/14 for loading.
3. CKT LV-1/6 has only .2 KVA on Panel Schedule, yet it powers 3 receptacles.
4. There appears to be conduit and conductor between different branch circuits. See grid areas 7F/8F and 5G/6G.
5. There is no Panel LP-5. See grid 5C.
6. There is no Panel LP-4. See grid 8C.
7. PNL LP-11 appears to be incorrectly called out as LP-3.
8. There is no cash register on LPE-1/41.
9. LPE-3/24 appears to be incorrectly called out as LPE-3/26.

Sheet E6
1. RTU-19 and RTU-20 shall have disconnects within sight of these units.
2. PRV-13, PRV-14, PRV-11, and PRV-12 in Garden Center doe not correspond to these designations on Sheet E4. Also check PRV-9 by Gridline 2A and PRV-10 by Gridline 10B.

Sheet E-8B
1. Verify proper clearances around equipment, Detail 2/E8B. Identify clearly all existing versus new equipment.
2. Show location of new ATS.

Sheet E10 and E10A
1. Provide load summations for all panels.

Sheet E11
1. Add J1 and J2 designations to Light Fixture Schedule. Especially in the area where the fixtures on Sheet E2 Keynotes 15 and 16 are to be mounted, there is a concern about these fixtures as being installed in an area with a fabric roof in the Garden Center.
2. Specify "flexible wiring" as it appears in Keynote 3 of Light Fixture Schedule, and every other place where it appears in these documents.

Sheet E13

1. Specify "flex" as it appears here and every other place where it appears in these documents.

Sheet E15
1. Specify "flex" as it appears here and every other place where it appears in these documents.
12/17/2002 MARTIN HAEBERLE PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide waste/vent isometric for existing and proposed fixtures.
2. Provide gas isometric including developed lengths.
3. Indicate on plumbing schedule new and abandoned fixtures, include backflow prevention devices.
12/17/2002 MARTIN HAEBERLE BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a completed City code analysis sheet. Include A-2 area that exceeds 750 square feet.
2. Structural calculations indicate the use of exposure b. Justify the use of exposure b or revise calculations utilizing exposure c.
3. Provide calculations for the following: proposed foundations, proposed stair and landing, 33-foot high 4" cmu wall.
4. Provide completed Special Inspection forms for required inspections.
12/18/2002 MARTIN HAEBERLE MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
12/18/2002 MHAEBER1 WATER REVIEW Approved
12/26/2002 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/27/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed