Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM05206
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/02/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Landscaping is required for the proposed retention basin. [LUC 3.7.4.3, DS 10-01.0] Include a planting plan for the basin area in accordance with the applicable standard. |
12/02/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception, previously developed site. |
12/03/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/05/2002 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
12/05/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Add the GFA of the existing storage building located west of the principal building to applicable calculations under general notes four (4) and five (5). Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.B, when the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A. 2. Revise the vehicle parking calculation to be based on the proposed use noted under general note number three (3), "Commercial Storage". Refer to L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.4 "Commercial Storage" for the vehicle parking requirements. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 3. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1, a minimum five (5) wide pedestrian refuge area is required between the proposed building and the vehicular use area (PAAL). Within the pedestrian refuge area a minimum four (4) wide sidewalk is required per D.S. 2-08.4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A12 4. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. |
12/12/2002 | ANY | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | Per the previous approved Site plan and aerials, the existing dumpster location is not shown correctly. The proposed placement, behind the sidewalk, also creates an unwanted situation. Perhaps moving the dumpster in front of the sidewalk would alleviate this problem. Please adjust. |
12/12/2002 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Cheryl Hall Centerline Offset 242 N. 2nd Ave. SUBJECT: 7960 S. Kolb Road Site plan T02CM05206 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Add basin responsibility note to notes. Call out the master hydrology report and the date the HR was approved to satisfy this comment. 2. Correct NE to SE in Location Map per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4. 3. Per the previous approved Site plan and aerials, the existing dumpster location is not shown correctly. The proposed placement, behind the sidewalk, also creates an unwanted situation. Perhaps moving the dumpster in front of the sidewalk would alleviate this problem. Please adjust. 4. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. This comment may be satisfied by a general note indicating locations where used per COT/SD. 5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 8. Add note regarding maximizing landscaped areas 6" for water harvesting. 9. Vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate, |
12/12/2002 | ANY | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
12/12/2002 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |