Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM01104
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan/Grading Plan 1. Roof drainage is not acceptable to flow across sidewalks. Indicate downspouts and splashguards on all existing and proposed buildings and structures. D.S. 2-02.2.1.7 2. Existing and future sight visibility triangles for an arterial street the Far side 125'. D.S. 2-02.2.1.10, D.S.3-01.5.3 3. Indicate dimensioned refuse enclosure detail. Gates are required. This detail is required to be on the Site Plan. 4. Identify with a symbol the diagonal crossed hatch around the perimeter of the buildings. 5. Indicate a detail of the 5' c.m.u. wall with openings. Site plan only. 6. Show a cross section of basin (s). Site plan only. Drainage Report 1. Recalculate the Stormwater Retention calculation using the 5-year storm runoff coefficients, soil type "D" as per the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, Table 3.4 |
| 08/28/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER. |
| 08/28/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER. |
| 08/29/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. City of Tucson lot combination covenant was not found in the resubmittal package. Previous comment: Pima County Assessors' records indicate this site is comprised of two lots. Lot combination is required prior to site plan approval. Attached is a copy of the lot combination covenant prepared by the City Attorney's office, which must be recorded and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed freestanding signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 3. Label and dimension future sight visibility triangles along 10th Avenue. A vehicle parking space may not be located within a sight visibility triangle. D.S. 2-02.2.1A.10 4. Note the building area and vehicular use area expansion calculations. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 5. Indicate the location of the disabled parking sign on the handicap parking space details on sheet C-2.0. 6. A response letter addressing the 1st review comments was not found in the resubmittal package. Please provide a response letter with the resubmittal package. 7. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 09/04/2002 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Refer to Zoning Review comment number five (5) dated September 4, 2002. |
| 09/16/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/16/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2002 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |