Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-198
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/08/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-198 PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/08/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Include "A resubdivision of" Lot 2…..on all Title Blocks. 2.) Change Southwest to Southeast on all Title Blocks. es |
| 04/10/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a copy of the revised Native Plant Preservation Plan with the next submittal per DS 2-15. 2. A Development Standard Modification Request was conditionally approved on this site to modify more than five (5) percent of the Protected Riparian Area on the above listed site. Add a general note stating the DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications granted, and any conditions imposed. Also, add the DSMR case number to each sheet of the development plan/tentative plat, landscape plan and NPP plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block. 3. Demonstrate compliance with the following DSMR conditions on the NPP Plan and landscape plan: a.) Revise the Plant Inventory list to identify any plants numbered on NPP 3 of 4, but not shown in the list and include any additional plants, other than creosote, having basal trunk diameters greater than 2 inches. Additional documentation that may be usually required for an ERR will not be required by the Landscape Section in accordance with DS 2-13.2.5.B.1 b.) Provide mitigation in accordance with DS 2-13.2.5.B.3.a.1 for all vegetation removed from the 100-year floodplain in areas suitable for long term viability, such as the proposed retention basin. Include a mitigation summary planting and maintenance plan as part of the landscape plans for the project. Provide one additional copy of the landscape/mitigation plans for OCSD. |
| 04/18/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/25/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 05/05/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: S07-198, Premises At Tucson Airport 3649 E. Corona Road, zoned I-1 (divide 1 lot into 3, personal storage) Tentative Plat/Development Plan - 2nd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2008 DUE DATE: May 1, 2008 COMMENTS: Acknowledgement: CDRC manager advises only one final plat needed. 1. Per conversation David Rivera, please provide a note that states official condo conversion to occur with recordation of city approved final plat. 2. Regarding easements: A) provide a note after each proposed, keynoted easement "to be recorded via final plat". B) are detention basins really "easements"? all easements must be graphically depicted C) declare type of easements dedicated to Pima County for emergency - access? D) please delineate boundaries of private access easement 3. Per DS 2-05.2.4.A, I acknowledge your response lot lines are not distinctly called out on sheets 3 & 4 per discussion with city engineering staff. Zoning needs it for setback information for permits/records. Please keynote the lot lines for lots 1, 2 & 3. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.4.C, regarding the phasing of lot 2: A) List general note "Lot 2 to be developed separately as phase 2, with review and approval of a separate development plan." 5. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, regarding traffic circulation: (PAAL = Parking Area Access Lane) Lot 3: Personal Storage use: A) dimension each PAAL -from travel areas, not including pedestrian refuge areas. B) dimension private access drive width - not including pedestrian refuge areas C) on sheet 5, please remove references to "street" cross sections, these area PAALs. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian/handicapped accessibility: Lot 3. A) Per DS 2-08, per last review: a continuous pedestrian route must be provided from street to storage office. Further clarification-DS 2-08.4.1 requires the sidewalk to the office to be physically separated from the PAAL - raised, curbing, etc.. You must provide a sidewalk that meets this requirement from the street all the way to the office. (Hence, my prior suggestion to relocate the office closer to the entry PAAL.) B) Connect all buildings in storage area with pedestrian route - via striped crosswalks, etc., per DS 2-08.3.1 C) In lot 1, is this a sidewalk around a parking space - connects to what? Secured with a man-gate? Provide crossing to sidewalk to street. Dimension width as well. D) Per DS 2-08.4.1.F, pedestrian refuge shall not be located between PAAL and parking space it serves - i.e. handicapped space cannot have a crosswalk at bottom of space. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N,:regarding buildings A) Response indicates carports will be less than 20' tall, but the general note 6 indicates 20' height includes carports. Clarify for permitting purposes. B) "kiosk" implies a building. Provide dimensions, heights, setbacks for kiosk on lot 1. 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) per LUC 3.3.4., 2 parking spaces are required for office - the revision shows one space has been removed. Replace. B) revise parking calculation for lot 3 on sheet 1 and list that 2 parking spaces are required for the personal storage office C) on lot 1, identify if areas outside fencing are turnarounds or parking spaces. D) Note, parking spaces abutting vertical objects over 6" must be 10' wide, per DS 3-05. Appears parking spaces directly adjacent to fencing. E) 2 parking spaces will be required for any kiosk/office use on lot 1 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) Please provide directional signage near pedestrian gate advising where bike parking and office are per DS 2-09. B) Bicycle parking spaces will be required for any kiosk/office use on lot 1 10. Per DS 2-03.2.4. M, regarding setbacks: A) dimension from all property lines to nearest structure, for records and inspections -see building & covered carports relations to north property line - for permits/records. 11. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. If you have any questions, please contact me vie email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. NOTE, ACCESSIBLE REVIEW IS AS FOLLOWS, DONE BY RON BROWN. 5 MAY 2008 S07-198/PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 5: A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. II. SHEET 2 of 5: A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. B. PROVIDE ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT KIOSK AND MAIL BOX. C. PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE MARKED CROSSING FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN WAY TO THE NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 405 AND 406. III. SHEET 3 of 5: A. DITTO ITEMS IIA, B AND C ABOVE B. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTIONS 403.3 AND 502.5 C. TURN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 90 DEGREES COUNTER CLOCK WISE, CANNOT ACCESS OVER A MARKED CROSSING. D. FOR THE SAFETY OF DISABLED PERSONS WITH VISION IMPAIRMENT, A PHYSICAL SEPARATION FROM ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AND VEHICLE AREAS IS NEEDED. PARKING AREAS THAT ARE FLUSH WITH THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAYS DO NOT PROVIDE A PHYSICAL SEPARATION. THIS IS PREVALENT AT THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IN FRONT OF UNITS 1 THROUGH 17, AND THE SIDE 34 AND 35. THERE ARE SEVERAL WAYS THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED: 1. RAISE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY AND PROVIDE A 6" HIGH CURB AND WALK AREA. 2. PROVIDE A SURFACE MOUNTED, CONTINUOUS, CONCRETE CURB BARRIER APPROXIMATELY 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 3. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS GUARD RAIL 4. PROVIDE A 2' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING (TRUNCATED DOMES) AND A 4' WIDE MINIMAL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALK WAY BEHIND THE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP, ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FLUSH SURFACE AREA. E. NEED A RAMP AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MARKED CROSSING LOCATED SOUTH OF UNIT ONE. F. SEVERAL ACCESSIBLE WALK WAYS EXCEED 5% IN SLOPE DIFFERENTIATION AND ARE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND MUST COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. THESE WALK WAY AREAS ARE: 1. FROM DRIVE ENTRANCE CURVE TO STORAGE UNIT ONE: 5.2% 2. IN FRONT OF UNITS 1 THROUGH 6: 5.6% 3. IN FRONT OF UNITS 12 THROUGH 17: 6.3% G. PROVIDE ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT KIOSK AND MAIL BOX. H. PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE MARKED CROSSING FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN WAY TO THE NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 405 AND 406. IV. SHEETS 4 of 5: A. THE WALK WAY FROM THE ENTRANCE DRIVE TO THE FIRST STORM CELL SCUPPER EXCEED 5% IN SLOPE DIFFERENTIATION AND IS CONSIDERED A RAMP AND MUST COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. THESE WALK WAY AREAS ARE: B. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL THE ACCESSIBLE CURB/SIDEWALK RAMPS AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1. C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF R.O.W. CURBS COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207. END OF REVIEW C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-198. Premises at tucson airport 2. tpa.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 05/08/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/09/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 10, 2008 To: ANDIE HASLEM EEC - ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT Tent. Plat – 2nd Submittal S07-198 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #17 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 3: Utility Key Note #3 refers to a Dump Station. The Dump Station can not be connected to the sewer line as it appears to be per this plan. Also symbol 1G in this same area does not appear to be pointing to anything. Sheet 2: The gates in the chain link fence crossing the public sewer easement must all three be a minimum of 30’ wide. Sheet 3: Show on this plan that PCRWRD will have an adequate stabilized driving surface over the public sewer line within the 30’ public sewer easement. Sheet 3: Show that manholes 1A, 1C, 1F and 1G will be equipped with watertight manhole covers. Sheet 4: The sewer line reach from MH 1F to 1H should be shown as constructed of DIP. Sheet 4: Move MH 1H further south off the steep slope. A letter of private sewer authorization will be required before approval of this development plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd ) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/05/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 5, 2008 SUBJECT: Premises at Tucson Airport- 2nd Tentative Plat Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3649 E Corona Road, T15S R14E Sec16 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S07-198 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report (Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc., 30NOV07 revised 01APR08), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 25APR07) and a copy of the referenced Partial Environmental Resource Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The Tentative Plat is not approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.9-06: A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) was conditionally approved on this site to modify more than five (5) percent of the Protected Riparian Area. Add the DSMR case number to each sheet of the development plan/tentative plat in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Add a general note stating the approved DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications granted, and any conditions imposed. DRAINAGE REPORT: 2) Title 4 Chapter 30 R4-30-304.E.4: Revise the Drainage Report along with the Tentative Plat/ Development Plan to provide the expiration date along with the seal for the engineer of record. Per the referenced section; "All original documents should include a notation beneath the seal either written, typed, or electronically generated that provides the day, month, and year of expiration of current registration, as shown in Appendix B. (Effective 3/08/08)." 3) Revise the Drainage Report to provide a discussion on the erosion hazard setback line for the regulatory wash running through the southern portion of the property. The erosion hazard setback must be calculated for the wash and shown on the both the drainage exhibit Figure 5 and Tentative Plat. The calculation provided in the response letter needs to be included in a discussion within the Drainage Report, revise. 4) DS Sec.10-02.11.4.4.2: Revise the Tentative Plat to accurately show all drainage improvements per the Drainage Report and exhibits. Provide accurate cross sections and details in plan view on the Tentative Plat to reflect the requirements in the Drainage Report refer to comment #13 for all conflicts with Drainage Report and Tentative Plat. TENTATIVE PLAT: 5) DS Sec.9-06: A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) was conditionally approved on this site to modify more than five (5) percent of the Protected Riparian Area. Add the DSMR case number to each sheet of the development plan/tentative plat in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Add a general note stating the approved DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications granted, and any conditions imposed. 6) Title 4 Chapter 30 R4-30-304.E.4: Revise the Tentative Plat/ Development Plan Sheets to provide the expiration date along with the seal for the engineer of record. Per the referenced section; "All original documents should include a notation beneath the seal either written, typed, or electronically generated that provides the day, month, and year of expiration of current registration, as shown in Appendix B. (Effective 3/08/08)." 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise Sheet 2 of the Tentative Plat to show all locations and types of subdivision control monuments, all monuments, specifically at all existing and proposed property corners must either be found or set and must be described. The property lines have been shown on Sheet 2 Detail E, however the monuments must also be shown at all property corners. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: CC&Rs are to be submitted at Final Plat submittal for review and approval. Verify that they provide for maintenance responsibility for all common areas, private drainage easements and private access easement. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.E: Revise the Tentative Plat to accurately show the proposed phase line. All proposed development for Phase 1 must be shown outside of the proposed phase line for Phase 2. All landscaping, screen walls, and right-of-way improvements that are required to be built during the Phase 1 construction must be clearly shown to be within the Phase 1 boundary line. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that it is designed in accordance with Street DS Sec.3-01 and the Vehicular Use Area DS Sec.3-05. The following items need to be revised or added to the proposed Tentative Plat: a) Revise the Tentative Plat to depict and label the 18-feet radii concrete curbs returns to be constructed without encroaching into the adjacent property. The end of the curb return can not encroach into a projected line from the east property line at the southeast corner of the project. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. b) Revise Detail C on Sheet 2 to include a copy of the WWM Detail #111 or clearly show that the stabilized surface for the public easement is constructed out of the minimum design requirements per the LUC for vehicular use areas (concrete, asphalt or double shot chip seal). c) Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the minimum width of 20-feet for the fire access lanes that are shown by keynote #5. All fire access lanes must have a minimum 20-foot width requirement, revise. d) Revise the Tentative Plat to dimension the dump station location. Verify the minimum 24-foot width requirement for the unobstructed PAAL at this access point. Provide the dimension in plan view. e) Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly depict the proposed 16-foot access gate at the entrance of the proposed WWM access road. f) Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ANSI Standard requirements. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Revise the Tentative Plat to include the language "to be recorded per Final Plat" after all proposed easements. If the review of the plans by the respective utility companies changes the easement locations to interfere with buildings, drainage infrastructure, etc a revised Tentative Plat will be required to correctly show locations of buildings and improvements to be outside of the easements. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Revise the Tentative plat to comply with all parts of the original comment. All proposed Private Drainage Easements and Private Access Easement are to be clearly dimensioned prior to approval. Both the drainage easement and the access easement must be graphically depicted on the Tentative Plat with a legal description (surveyable lines). 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Per DS 2-08 a continuous pedestrian circulation route must be provided from the street to the proposed storage office. Further clarification-DS 2-08.4.1 requires the sidewalk to the office to be physically separated from the PAAL - raised, curbing, etc., revise all cross section and plan view to reflect. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Revise the Tentative Plat, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Report, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. a) Provide a detail for each individual riprap pad or other drainage structure showing the exact dimensions (width, length, depth, thickness, etc.), details, and elevations. The pads can be dimensioned in plan view or with a clear precise easy to read table for construction purposes. Specifically the 10'x13' splash pad in the northwest corner as shown on Sheet 3. b) Provide an access ramp into all basins to meet the minimum width of 15-feet. Provide spot elevations or percent slope for the ramp to verify that it does not exceed 15 percent. Per DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4 the standard does not distinguish between a private or public basin. All basins are required to have an access ramp into them. The use of ATVs or other vehicles driving over the constructed slopes to maintain the basin is not common engineering practice due to the erosion and break down of the slope from wear and tear. c) Revise the Tentative Plat to clarify the drainage openings in the proposed chain link fence around Basin #2. The chain link fence must be elevated at all inlet concentration points to allow water to pass through without blocking debris and trash causing adverse impacts to the property. d) Revise the Tentative Plat to clarify the drainage openings in the proposed 6-foot screen wall around Basin #1. Provide the wall within all cross sections that apply and clarify how the wall is built over the basin inlets. Provide a profile view showing lintels or other type of construction for the wall support at the depressed curb openings or clarify how the inlets operate with the block wall constructed over them. e) Revise the Tentative Plat and Basin #2 to show a cross section along the west property line at the northwest corner through the property line and basin side slope. A minimum 3-foot wide top of berm is required with a minimum 2-foot setback from toe of fill slope to property line. f) Revise Keynote #12 on all sheets to correctly label all proposed depressed curb openings. Specifically Keynote # 12F and 12G are missing from the table, but are shown in plan view, clarify. Revise Detail E on Sheet 5 to reference Keynote #12 a-g for the proposed wall openings. Stating per Drainage Report is not sufficient. g) Revise the Tentative Plat and Detail J on Sheet 4 to clarify the weir height per the Drainage Report. The Drainage Report calls out a 4-foot high weir wall, but the Tentative Plat only calls out 3-feet, clarify. h) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide for the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, retention basin, block wall and associated erosion protection. Revise all cross sections to clearly show the 2-foot setback from the property line as depicted in plan view. 15) DS Sec.6-01: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the referenced detail as shown in keynote 8B for the proposed double trash enclosure. Detail x could not be located on Sheet 4 of the proposed plat as stated, clarify. 16) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Tentative Plat to accurately show the direction of slope grade for the proposed 2:1 and 1.5:1 (H: V) slope along the west property line at the southwest corner of the property. The proposed slope must be correctly called out and verification of the required 2-foot setback is required. Provide a cross section through this area to verify all dimensions. 17) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 18) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a revised Geotechnical Report Evaluation that provides percolation rates for the detention/retention basins for 5-year threshold retention. Percolation rates must meet or exceed the drain down times as shown in DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3. This is required even if the basin provides a low flow pipe. GRADING PLAN: 19) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit (T08BU00622) has been submitted for this project due to the cut and fill quantities and comments will be posted under a separate cover. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. The grading plan will be reviewed once all comments associated with the Tentative Plat have been addressed. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the site plan. 20) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Tentative Plat, drainage report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 21) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 06/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 6, 2008 Andie Hasle Engineering & Environmental Consultants 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport Tentative Plat Dear Andie: Your submittal of April 4, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |
| 06/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | March 23, 2010 Andie Haslem Engineering & Environmental Consultants 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, AZ 85712 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILES Tentative and Final Plat Per Section 4.1.7.1, Maximum Review Period The subdivider has one (1) year from the date of tentative plat submittal to obtain approval of the plans. Failure to obtain approval means the review period has expired Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport December 20, 2007 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat applications are required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file S07-198 |