Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-198
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 01/02/2008 9:23 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 01/04/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the title block to identify the Plant Inventory Methodology as the selected method of compliance, rather than the selective plant methodology. LUC 3.8.4.1.A 2. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S07-198), the annexation case number (C15-88-1) and any other applicable case numbers to all sheets of the development plan/tentative plat, landscape plan and NPPO plan. 3. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 4. There is a portion of the site along the existing water course with designated xeroriparian habitat. An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per Development Standard 1-07.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5 shall be prepared for the site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. The Report shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this Division. |
| 01/14/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 11, 2008 To: ANDIE HASLEM EEC - ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S07-198 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, S07-198, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 3. Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 4. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #17 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 5. Sheet 3: The covered parking can not encroach the 30' public sewer easement, clearly demonstrate that it does not. Also the public sewer line can not run through the detention basin on property. 6. Sheet 3: Utility Key Note #3 refers to a Dump Station. Please clarify. 7. Sheet 3: Flow through manhole 1H would not be needed. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 01/22/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-198 PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: January 17, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on Location Map. Change Southwest to Southeast under Location Map. Include resubdivision information and Section, Township and Range on all Title Blocks. Label buildings numerically. Include North arrow and scale on pg. 4. jg |
| 01/23/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/24/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#192191 January 21, 2008 Dear Andie Haslem: SUBJECT: Premises @ Tucson Airport S07-198 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 14, 2008 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garcia at (520) 917-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:S. Garcia |
| 01/24/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Andy Steuart 01/22/2008 2:34 PM >>> S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport: Tentative Plat Review -Per location map on 1 of 5, request "Southwest" be changed to "Southeast." -Request clarification concerning the areas of C.A. "A", Private Access Easement and drive-through area on Lot 1. It is left to interpretation if C.A. "A" and Pvt. Access Esmt. are the same area and how Lot 1 is effected (i.e. is the shaded area Pvt. Access Esmt. & C.A. "A?"). -Concerning the Public Easement along the E. boundary, a potential exists to remove improvements placed within the corridor. |
| 01/24/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport 01/22/08 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: Co9-82-106 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () No Resubmittal Required - APPROVED ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 1/4/08 |
| 01/25/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: S07-198, Premises At Tucson Airport 3649 E. Corona Road, zoned I-1 (divide 1 lot into 3, personal storage) Tentative Plat/Development Plan - 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 24, 2008 DUE DATE: January 22, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat/development plan. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat/development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is December 19, 2008. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard (ANSI), Tucson City Code (TCC), and International Building Code 2006 (IBC). In addition, this project was reviewed for content specified in DS 2-05 for Development Plans, and DS 2-03 for Tentative Plats. The review comments are broken down into Development Plan and Tentative Plat comments - Note that several requirements are the same for each of these processes, thus I put those under the DP comments. 3. Please note, the project will require two separate final plats - one for the lot lines and common area, and one for the condo conversion of the proposed storage units. 4. Per the above note, please remove all references to a condo conversion on the tentative plat (in the title block, in details, and in the general notes). Staff is reviewing it as solely the split of the land and the development of the lots - the condo conversion element is solely under the final plat review process. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 5. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.7, regarding annexation: A) list annexation case file number C15-88-1 in lower right corner, near title block. B) specify in general note 6, sheet 2, height restriction is per Annexation case C15-88-1. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.8, add Development Services case number S07-198 near title block. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, please ensure all easements, including type and any existing recordation information, are graphically depicted on the plans. B) In addition, please provide docket and page for recordation of abandonment of Elvira and for use of this same area as an access easement to Pima County. Place note "docket ____, page ____" next to the notation on the Elvira reference. C) clarify if an easement is provided on the property to the east, as the plan shows a 16' gated access point that would exit onto the adjacent property. I only see an abandoned easement of Elvira that runs in this area. 8. Per DS 2-05.2.3.C, please provide dimensions for Corona Road - locating the travel lane, curbing and centerline. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.A, I see the lot line exhibit on sheet 2, thank you. To assist with the review, please darken the lot lines --or otherwise make them distinct- on sheets 3 and 4, with bearings and dimensions just like you provided nicely on sheet 2. Thank you. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.C, regarding the phasing of lot 2: A) It appears to me that the lot lines for lot 2 are the phasing boundary, however, I don't want to assume incorrectly. If the phasing lines are lot 2, please provide a note that states "Lot 2 to be developed separately as phase 2, with review and approval of a separate development plan." B) If the phasing line is not the boundary of lot 2, please provide a phasing line clearly marked, with access provisions noted and calculations for development of each phase - ensuring it is clear how the development will be impacted by phasing. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, regarding traffic circulation: Lot 1 A) call out the lock box/keypad etc. for the entry to the RV storage B) provide a dimension on each PAAL within the development C) provide directional arrows for traffic flow D) Clarify the access point at the far NE area of the site - 16' wide gate implies one way access. Give directional arrow, clarify if it's emergency access, sliding gate, swinging gate, lock box? Signage as such as well - if emergency egress only. Lot 3: Personal Storage use: A) provide a dimension on each PAAL within the development B) provide directional arrows for traffic flow C) indicate any garage doors on the typical detail provided for the unit D) dimension private access drive width E) provide dimensions for length of each gate at access point F) dimension from lock box location to edge of entry PAAL. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian/handicapped accessibility: Lot 3. A) Per DS 2-08, and LUC 3.3.7.2.C.4, please provide a pedestrian refuge area along the south edge of the storage buildings to have refuge from the entry PAAL. B) Per DS 2-08, a continuous pedestrian and handicapped accessible route must be provided from street to the storage office. Suggestion, rather than having to continue the sidewalk through the development, with truncated domes and ramps all the way to the current office location - relocate the office closer to the entry PAAL. C) Provide a man gate to allow pedestrian entry to the storage office - either kept open during business hours, or provide a buzz in entry feature. Be sure gate does not reduce pedestrian opening to less than 4' wide. D) Provide accessible route from man gate to office, providing ramps and truncated domes where transitioning from pedestrian refuge to vehicle use area. E) Further review comments may be forthcoming on pedestrian route 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, regarding buildings: A) dimension overall building footprints for all buildings on Lot 3, for records and permitting. B) I see the note that buildings will be 20' in height, please clarify if the carports will also be this height. C) For permitting and records, please provide the overall lengths of all carport structures D) Keynote entry to office E) Keynote typical location of any doors/cargo doors on unit - for permitting purposes 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O, regarding loading zones: A) per prior determination by Zoning Administrator, personal storage units with direct vehicular access to the units do not require loading zones. You may remove the reference indicating 5 are required for Lot 3. If you are providing OFFICIAL loading zones - not just general loading areas -, they need to be dimensioned with striping on the plan and the dimensions on either side of the PAALs must account for traffic flow as well. 16. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) per LUC 3.3.4., 2 parking spaces are required for office, which you have provided, thank you. The ANSI and IBC codes require, however, that one van accessible handicapped space with an access aisle is provided. Please revise, and know further review of handicapped parking, including signage, wheel stops, access aisle and ramps, are forthcoming. Please provide a detail of the parking, and keynote location on the plan. 17. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) per the LUC 3.3.4., two class 2 bike parking spaces are needed for the office. B) Please provide a detail drawing of the class 2 bike parking, ensuring it meets the updated types of acceptable bike parking racks noted on the internet under DS 2-09. C) Please ensure class 2 bike parking is placed within 50' of the entrance to the office and is visible from the office and entry PAAL, per DS 2-09. 18. Per DS 2-05.2.4.T, see Environmental Services on location of waste containers. 19. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, indicate where postal service will be located. 20. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, indicate any free standing signage or lighting, with specifications. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 21. Per DS 2-03.2.1.C, please increase lettering size in location map sheet 1 to 12 point. 22. Per DS 2-03.2.1.D, regarding location map: A) please call out subdivisions by name, and book and page B) please identify the city limits boundary 23. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G.2, remove reference to condos in title block (see comment 4). 24. Per DS 2-03.2.1.H, I'm sorry, I didn't find a north arrow and scale on sheet 4. 25. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.4, add note to sheet 2, "The number of lots is three (3)." 26. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.8, in note 3 on sheet 2, please add the word "subdivision" after the word "site/" referencing the overall project area. 27. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.9, add note "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No. 7025, Zoning Ordinance 7090, which established zoning in the Country Club/Valencia Annexation District." 28. Per DS 2-03.2.3.H, please keynote all walls on the site, with their heights. It appears there are screen walls and walls near the entry to the RV storage that need information. 29. Per DS 2-03.2.4.C, provide the square footage of the common area A. 30. Per DS 2-03.2.4. M, regarding setbacks: list in Project Information notes on sheet 1: A) minimum building setback per LUC for Storage Uses in I-1 against I-1 is (0'). B) dimension from all property lines to nearest structure, for records and inspections. C) List in note: minimum building setback per LUC for street - Corona is not a MSR, thus developed area setback is fine to list - "the greater of 20' or 1.5 times the height of the exterior building wall, from property line to structure". 31. If available, please provide CCRs' for maintenance of the common area A on lot 3. 31. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. If you have any questions, please contact me vie email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-198. Premises at tucson airport 1. tpa.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 01/25/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Show all dimensions of enclosure inside and out. Wall protectors/bollards must demostrate separation from the CMU wall of minimum 2 inches and call out. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/28/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/30/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: January 30, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport T151416 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following adjustments by final plat stage. The section, township and range must be in the title blocks as well as the location map; also add the subdivision name and map & plat that the new subdivision is coming out of. The name of the subdivision in your legal description should be Bandes. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 02/01/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 1, 2008 SUBJECT: Premises at Tucson Airport- Tentative Plat Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3649 E Corona Road, T15S R14E Sec16 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S07-198 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted Tentative Plat, Drainage Report (Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc., 30NOV07) and a copy of the Title Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The Tentative Plat is not approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT: 1) Tucson Code Chapter 26 Sec.26.5.2.4: Per the referenced section all Tentative Plats, Site Plans or Development Plans must show development with no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian 100-year floodplain. The construction of the detention/retention basin within the mapped Xeroriparian 100-year floodplain located in the southern portion of the property is not considered a necessary disturbance. 2) Per conversation with Ann Audry, City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable, this project has already been preliminarily reviewed and she and Joe Linville, DSD Landscaping Section has already agreed to a preliminary plan. Submit all correspondence and the preliminary plans with the next submittal for further clarity. Otherwise all development must comply with DS Sec.9-06. DRAINAGE REPORT: The Drainage Report submitted with this activity was not sealed, signed or dated by a civil engineer. All professional reports must either be signed or sealed by the engineer of record or the word "PRELIMINARY" must be clearly written across the cover page of the report to satisfy the requirements of the Board of Technical Registrants. For future reference Drainage Reports submitted without being signed and sealed or without the "PRELIMINARY" wording will not be reviewed for regulatory compliance, this will affect the review time of the project. 3) DS Sec.9-06: Refer to this section for the preparation, submittal, and review procedures for development within areas that have environmental habitat in conformance with Article 1, Division 1, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations. Any disturbance of the riparian habitat will require an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) approval from DSD Landscaping Section prior to Tentative Plat approval. 4) Revise the Drainage Report Section I.C and all other corresponding section to correctly show that the subject property is located within both a balanced basin and a critical basin per the Critical and Balanced Basin Maps for the City of Tucson. The maps show that the top third of the property is located within the critical basin of the Rodeo Wash watershed and the lower two-thirds within the balanced basin of the Airport Wash watershed. 5) DS Sec.10-02.2.1 &2.2: Revise the Drainage Report to include a discussion specific on critical basin design for the project. The Drainage Report has demonstrated that the post developed discharge value for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events are less than the existing discharge values and have also been reduced by the required 15 percent value. Even though conditions have been meet the Drainage Report must still accurately reflect the onsite conditions. Since the project is a commercial development and is larger than 1-acre, 5-year threshold retention criteria does apply as stated in the report, however a geotechnical report is required to discuss soil suitability and percolation rates. 6) Revise the Drainage Report to provide a discussion on the erosion hazard setback line for the regulatory wash running through the southern portion of the property. The erosion hazard setback must be calculated for the wash and shown on the both the drainage exhibit Figure 5 and Tentative Plat. If the erosion hazard setback is to be reduced provide a discussion and details that meet the requirements within DS Sec.10-02 Chapter VII and the recommendations within the required geotechnical report 7) Provide a revised Drainage Report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all scupper concentration points. Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers on the proposed Tentative Plat. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A Geotechnical Report is required for this project. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soil report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in Geotechnical Comments section. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. 9) DS Sec.10-02.11.4.4.2: Revise the Tentative Plat to accurately show all drainage improvements per the Drainage Report and exhibits. Provide accurate cross sections and details in plan view on the Tentative Plat to reflect the requirements in the Drainage Report (i.e. all riprap splash pad dimensions, required scuppers at pedestrian crossing locations, basin geometry along with water surface elevation, spot elevations, inlet and outlet details, etc.). TENTATIVE PLAT: 10) DS Sec.9-06: All Tentative Plats proposing development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 9-06 shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and the Protected Riparian Area in Plan view. The Regulated Areas on this site are the existing 100-year floodplain limit. Revise the site plan as necessary to clearly document the locations of the exiting 100-year floodplain limit. Show the same information (regulatory limits) on the plant inventory, landscape/mitigation plans, and future grading plan. 11) Tucson Code Sec 26-5.2.4: The proposed development can not unnecessarily alter the regulatory Xeroriparian habit that is located within the 100-year regulatory floodplain in the southern portion of the property. This habitat may not unnecessarily altered per TCC Sec. 26-5.2. The Xeroriparian vegetation is protected per DS 9-06.2.2.C. Review and approval for the disturbance and proposed mitigation of the Xeroriparian Habitat is required by the Landscaping Section prior to Tentative Plat approval. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the scale on Sheet 4, verify the contour intervals are also shown along with the north arrow. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as major watercourses and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.G.3: Revise the Tentative Plat and the Title Block on both sheets to include a brief legal description, specifically provide the recordation information of the existing subdivision plat (Book 9, Page 006). 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.H: Revise Sheet 4 of the Tentative Plat to include the north arrow. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: The correct Tentative Plat number (S07-198) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on both Sheets. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.4: Revise the Tentative Plat to include a note stating "The Number of Lots is 3" 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a: Provide the following note per this section "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.G: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide an Assured Water Supply Note. In compliance with state law, a Tentative Plat can not be approved unless there is an assured water supply to the proposed subdivision as certified by ADWR. Per this section there are 2 notes to choose from to add to the Tentative Plat, revise. 20) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to show all locations and types of subdivision control monuments, all monuments, specifically at the property corners, found or set will be described. 21) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.B: Revise the Tentative Plat to include the Basis of Bearing line in plan view on Sheet 1. 22) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide all information regarding existing public right-of-ways. Provide the r-o-w width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for Corona Road. 23) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly show the recordation data for the abandonment of Elvira Road. 24) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.E: Revise Tentative Plat to assure that all utilities shown within the proposed basins (Basin 1 and 3 specifically) are buried with deep enough cover to prevent damage. Provide a cross section through the basin showing utility locations and depth of cover. 25) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Revise the Tentative Plat and the Basis of Elevation section on Sheet 1 to reference the City of Tucson field book and page number. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J.1: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly label the 100-year floodplain limits and the erosion hazard setback line that are associated with the regulatory wash. 27) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J.3: A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals and the erosion hazard setback on the plat should be included in the legend. 28) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.A: Revise the Tentative Plat and Sheets 3 and 4 to show the proposed lot lines. 29) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the Tentative Plat and the Title Block to include a description for Common Area "A" (PAAL, Vehicular Use Area, etc.). Verify that CC&R's are submitted and that they provide for maintenance responsibility for all common areas, private drainage easements and private access easement. 30) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.E: Revise Sheet 4 of the Tentative Plat to clearly show proposed phase lines. 31) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that it is designed in accordance with Street DS Sec.3-01 and the Vehicular Use Area DS Sec.3-05. The following items need to be revised or added to the proposed Tentative Plat: a) Revise the Tentative Plat to label and dimension the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of Corona Road. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. b) Depict and label the 18-feet radii concrete curbs returns per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the proposed driveway entrance. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. c) Revise the Tentative Plat to provide for the required handicap access ramps at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation (i.e. the access point from Corona Road), show all handicap access ramps with truncated domes per ANSI Standards. d) Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the recordation information (Docket and Page) for both Corona Road and Elvira Road (abandonment). Label the centerline of the road and clearly show curbing, sidewalk locations, property line and the right-of-way line. e) Provide the dimensions for the proposed driveway access point for Corona Road. Refer to the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for minimum curb cut and drive way entrance requirements at public roadways for street development standards. 32) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Provide easements for all utilities (sewer, gas, electric, water, etc.) with recordation information or provide the description for each utility in the respective Common Areas, verify that the CCRs match the Common Area descriptions. 33) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: All proposed Private Drainage Easements and Private Access Easement are to be clearly dimensioned, proposed easements must be recorded and the recordation data must be provided on the Final Plat prior to approval. 34) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Either provide separately, or show a conceptual grading plan on the Tentative Plat, with the resubmittal of the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The conceptual grading plan is required on this project due to the proposed retention basin, regulatory drainage way and the cut and fill quantities shown. A Geotechnical Report is required to discuss the suitability of the project site. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Besides description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to retention basin, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the conceptual grading plan, Tentative Plat, and Drainage Report. 35) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Revise the Tentative Plat, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Report, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. a) Provide spot elevations at intervals along the proposed basin bottoms to show slope percentage. The bottom of basin slope must be 0.5% or greater to prevent accumulation of standing water and mosquito infestation. b) Provide a detail for each individual riprap pad or other drainage structure showing the exact dimensions (width, length, depth, thickness, etc.), details, and elevations. The pads can be dimensioned in plan view or with a clear precise easy to read table for construction purposes. c) Provide a cross section for the 18-inch RCP to verify elevations, slopes, and inlet and outlet locations. d) Provide a discussion on Phase II and a time line for completion and for permanent erosion control measures for the graded area. Verify if Lot 2 is going to be built out with a building pad for future development or if the site is to be left undisturbed. e) Revise the cross sections on Sheet 2 to label and dimension the water surface elevation, spot elevations, inlet and outlet controls, and all construction design requirements for the proposed detention/retention basins. f) Provide an access ramp into all basins to meet the minimum width of 15-feet. Provide spot elevations or percent slope for the ramp to verify that it does not exceed 15 percent. g) Revise the proposed retention basin on the Tentative Plat and drainage exhibit to meet the requirements within DS Sec.9-06. The basins must be designed so that it is entirely located outside of the regulatory Xeroriparian habitat. h) Revise the Tentative Plat and Drainage Report to show that the 10-year flows from all proposed concentration points is contained under the proposed pedestrian circulation areas. Provide details in plan view for the basin inlet and outlet, erosion protection and for any proposed scuppers under the pedestrian circulation. i) Clarify the difference in the Q100 discharge for Basin 1. The discharge at the outlet that is shown on the Tentative Plat does not match the drainage exhibit. 36) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Revise Tentative Plat to show the erosion hazard setback line that is shown on the drainage exhibit, Figure 4. All buildings must be shown to be located outside of the erosion hazard setback or a revised drainage report must be submitted showing erosion protection and scour calculations. 37) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide for the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, retention basin, block wall and associated erosion protection. Revise cross sections B and C to clearly show the 2-foot setback from the property line. 38) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 39) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report Evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from the buildings to the proposed detention/retention basins. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes, including any terracing requirements for constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement and asphalt recommendations for the vehicular use areas and PAALs. e) Provide percolation rates for the detention/retention basins for 5-year threshold retention. Percolation rates must meet or exceed the drain down times as shown in DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3. GRADING PLAN: 40) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit must be submitted for this project due to the cut and fill quantities. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. The grading plan will be reviewed once all comments associated with the Tentative Plat and ERR have been addressed. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the site plan. 41) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Tentative Plat, drainage report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 42) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, a Geotechnical Report, and all correspondence related to this project from the City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 02/04/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | >>> Jane Duarte 02/04/2008 11:28 AM >>> Parks and Recreation has no adverse comments on this project. Please Note: The Landscape Plans and the NPPO Plans have a different/incorrect Location Plan identified and an incorrect/old project title: Corona Road Storage and Future Office Retail. |
| 02/11/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 11, 2008 Andie Hasle Engineering & Environmental Consultants 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S07-198 Premises at Tucson Airport Tentative Plat Dear Andie: Your submittal of December 20, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Fire, Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Real Estate, Engineering, Zoning, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |
| 12/20/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/28/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Hydrant too close to building. See Water Department Standards. 2. Office/Retail on Lot 2 may need another hydrant depending on location of building. IFC 508. 3. First submittal of Water plan indicates condo storage buildings have automatic sprinklers and fire flow was calculated considering this. Please trasfer the note to this set. |
| 12/31/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S07-198, PREMISES AT TUCSON AIRPORT: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Without considering future office space (not provided) in lot 2, there is very minimal impact from lot 1 and lot 2 on the traffic of surrounding streets. Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |