Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-110
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/26/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: January 26, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the Final Plat: Delete Lupine Flower Drive on sheet 22. Delete Desert Daffodil Drive on sheet 22. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 01/31/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/31/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner - Zoning Review Section PROJECT: S07-110 (revision 2nd review) Mountain Vail Estates Revision to overall Tentative plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 31, 2011 DUE DATE: February 2, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 23, 2011. After consulting with PDSD staff and Real Estate staff, it is requested that the school site become part of the plat as block. The following comments will remain until the changes are made to the tentative plat and final plat. The rezoning condition for a pedestrian access through the previous park site must be completed and represented on the drawings. It is hard to represent compliance with this rezoning condition if the area that has been conveyed to the district in violation of the assurances is not shown on the plan as reference. (It is acknowledged that this issue is a legal issue that may need a zoning administrator determination.) 2. It is requested that the School site be labeled as a block and recorded as part of this plat rather than a residential lot of the subdivision or as "not part of this plat" note. 3. List the specific area in square feet and acreage of both the school site and the remaining residential development if different when the school area is subtracted from the revised subdivision. All calculations should be revised as required. 4. Revise the title block, CC&R's and any applicable notes related to the "Block" for the school site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07110tp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and if applicable additional requested documents. |
| 01/31/2011 | MPADILL1 | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-16 - Weinberg - MaryAnn Cleveland Way NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: H.A.M.P. SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: February 02, 2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: January 24, 2011 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Section S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat (Subject to Rezoning Case C9-06-16) January 24, 2011 Background: The Mountain Vail Estates (S07-110) final plat was approved in May of 2009. In August of 2010, Mayor and Council adopted a (rezoning) change of condition and the preliminary development plan. This allows for a conveyance of 11.69-acres within the plat boundary to change from platted lots, rights-of-way and a portion of Common Area B, to a school site for the Vail Unified School District, identified in the replat as lot 525. The 11.69-acre site is in a northwest quadrant area of the plat, located south of Mary Ann Cleveland Way. Current Review: In this review (2nd replat submittal) a request is made to exclude lot 525 (future school site) from the Mountain Vail Estates plat boundaries. As proposed, the replat does not conform to the requirements of rezoning case C9-06-16 and the Design Compatibility Report. The change of condition to the preliminary development plan (dated July 1, 2010) approved by Mayor and Council was to change an 11.26 acre area within the plat from common area and platted lots to a future Vail Unified School District site. Therefore, prior to conveyance and a replat, the future school site shall be in compliance with the conditions of rezoning and the Design Compatibility Report which addresses pedestrian connectivity among; pocket parks, the Esmond Station Railway alignment, and along the perimeters of the site where appropriate. Based on the current proposed replat, Community Planning staff comments are the following: 1. The Esmond Station Trail is a requirement of the plat, and shall be shown along the Esmond Station Railway alignment or where necessary along the perimeter of the site to allow a continues pedestrian connectivity that links the Esmond Station Railway alignment with adjacent land developments (future) and the Mountain Vail Estates site. Staff recommends that prior to the conveyance of the proposed school site to the Vail Unified School District, that the replat identify the school site as a "Block" in the Plat. Please address the following issues: 1.a Revise tentative plat (replat) to identify the proposed school site as a "Block" within the Mountain Vail Estates plat. 1.b Revise tentative plat (replat) S07-110, sheets 21 and 24 to show a continues undisturbed twelve (12) foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway (required as per Key Note #38 for the Esmond Station Rail Line & Trail alignment), extending from "Common Area C," located behind (east) lot 302, and head north across "Atterbury Wash Way. At this point delete the proposed standard sidewalk, and replace with a twelve (12) foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway along the north side of the "Atterbury Wash Way, between Cromley Brothers Drive and the west perimeter boundary where it shall link with the western perimeter "10' non-motorized public trail easement at a point northwest of "Atterbury Wash Way cul-de-sac. From this point north and within the western perimeter of the plat boundary show an undisturbed twelve (12) foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway (The Esmond Station Rail Line & Trail) until it abuts the historic Esmond Station Railway, located within the proposed school site. 2. The 12 foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway (required as per Key Note #38 for the Esmond Station Rail Line & Trail alignment) shall meet ADA standards, including at all drainage improvement crossings with the Esmond Station Trail and as approved by the Department of Parks and Recreation. A written approval from Parks and Recreation shall be included in the resubmittal. |
| 02/02/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/02/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR ` FAX: (520) 620-0135 February 1, 2011 To: Warren Thompson, PE Stantec Consulting Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Mountain Vail Estates Lots 1-135, and Common Area "A" and "B" (A Residential Cluster Project) Development Plan(Rev)- 2nd Submittal S07-110 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet 17: Clearly show that proposed MH# 43 and sewer length SWR-24 are public, not private as indicated by the private sewer line table on this page. Sheet 21: Clarify the sewer line table. Two SWR-68’s are shown on plan. Why is only the length for SWR-80 crossed off? Sheet 22: Remove all areas on plan and sewer line table where what was shown on the previously approved submittal is shown underneath. This makes the plan unreadable. Sheet 23: SWR-43 is not shown in the sewer line table. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $156.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 02/04/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 4, 2011 Warren Thompson Stantec 201 N. Bonita Ave # 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES Tentative Plat Revision Dear Warren: Your submittal of October 27, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 4 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Planning, Wastewater, PDSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Planning, Zoning, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $156.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893 Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 750-7470 |